posted on Feb, 1 2023 @ 09:02 AM
If humans are to blame for an animal's extinction within the last few hundred years, then restoring an extinct species to it's place in nature seems
like a good thing to do. However, some species like the passenger pigeon would create some huge problems in today's world, esp. if they were released
into an area that they never existed before, like Europe. Some animals like the dodo bird might not be a problem if they were restricted to a few
islands and others animals might be OK in Zoos perhaps.
The thing is that they can't even keep simple small endangered species alive like the Monarch butterfly because humans have changed the environment so
much and won't fix it. They need the common milkweed to survive and wintering grounds down south. Do you plant milkweeds or have a butterfly shield on
your car?
Here in Michigan is where the last known flock of passenger pigeons was sighted. The last greater prairie in Michigan disappeared in the 1980s because
the tall grass prairies were destroyed. Now we have the endangered Karner blue butterfly near extinction because no one plants wild lupines that they
need. All these species were common to Michigan and the Great Lakes but what did we do then and what do we do now about it? Very little, nothing at
all really.
My point is that you need to restore the environment first before you reintroduce a species that was once common to it, be they extinct or extirpated
from the area. The entire extinct ecosystem would have to be nearly intact before the highest level animals, like the mega fauna, can be reintroduced.
Without that all they would have is some freak show menagerie running wild.
edit on 1-2-2023 by MichiganSwampBuck because: For Clarity