It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Thrumbo
I don't know who is more annoying, the pfizer guy or the project veritas host.
So this pfizer guy who looks to be on ADHD medication or maybe a couple of drinks is talking out of his ass to sound cool, then the project veritas guy tries to spin it into something as bad as possible for shock factor.
And this is his entire career, to try to spin stories as an "undercover investigative" group.
But everything the pfizer guy is saying is pure theory and bull#. He never said they'd release the new viruses in order to profit off of vaccines for them. But, project veritas is insinuating this to make it scary and as if they actually uncovered some diabolical plot, lol.
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
Wow! If this is even being considered it makes me wonder what else they do to perpetuate their drug sales.
"Don't tell anybody about the largest crime against humanity in history, okay?" doesn't seem credible to me. He also said it's what he heard, just makes no sense. My understanding of high level operations of this type is highly compartmentalized structure and often with limited knowledge within the working group of what's even being done.
The guy thought he was on a real date and it's obvious he's very taken with the other person
Word is the person who got the footage was a former Pfizer employee ... hence Walker let his guard down.
originally posted by: TheToastmanCometh
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
he's most likely a diversity hire and we do not want to open that can of worms
originally posted by: iwanttobelieve70
If I was sheriff in the county where phizer or some of this crap was going on I would raid the place.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
I think this is poisoning the well and I very much doubt this person is who they claim.
"Don't tell anybody about the largest crime against humanity in history, okay?" doesn't seem credible to me. He also said it's what he heard, just makes no sense. My understanding of high level operations of this type is highly compartmentalized structure and often with limited knowledge within the working group of what's even being done. You have separate groups doing each stage so that most don't even know what the real goal is. Separate people doing delivery, collection, analysis, and then study, often without any group having sufficient expertise to put all the pieces together based on the data they have available.
The funding was through NIH/EcoHealth as we have seen in Fauci's emails and the delivery method was through Moderna's mRNA platform. This directed evolution is the same exact kind of semantic work around that they were trying to use to claim NIH wasn't funding GOF. Pfizer has never made this claim that I'm aware of. Why would they bother buying this cow when NIH is funding it through 3rd parties, the gov orgs are playing PR while brokering your deals, and they're getting all the milk liability free?
O'Keefe picked a horrible time and topic to let his eagerness to break a huge story take the lead over his ability to back his claim. A really bad time. This is probably going to be used to discredit the entire effort to move against the real culprits.
I'd be happy to be proven wrong and for this to be some smoking gun, but it doesn't match what is known so far and I believe it's going to be used to tremendous benefit for those who'd like to have discredited claims to muddy the water.