America Will "Soon" Have "Hate Speech" Laws, EU Commission VP Tells World Economic Forum

The WEF really wants censorship and hate speech laws in the US so that their narratives are not challenged and they can prosecute any dissenters with criminal charges.

Questions about a vaccine? Blasphemy!

Challenging gender education for preschoolers? Blasphemy!

European Commission VP Věra Jourová at the WEF:

"Illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the U.S. I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law."

twitter.com...

NYT’s Sulzberger: Disinformation is "the most existential" challenge we’re grappling with as a society

twitter.com...

Rep. Moulton blames "misinformation" for his inability to get his constituents to take more Covid shots

www.blacklistednews.com...

During the same WEF panel, New York Times owner Arthur Sulzberger whined about the "existential" threat of "disinformation" and said people criticizing "fake news" reminds him of Nazi Germany.

(Maybe not lie then and you won't get called out?)

Awesome comment:

Much "hate speech" = politically-inconvenient, true speech. Hate speech legislation will be motivated by hatred directed towards those who dare to learn, to think, to speak and to act in accord with their own conscience. We came to this country so that we could speak freely and act righteously without fear of repression by the rich, only to learn that the rich got here before we did.

No wonder we saw this so soon . . . . .

Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee introduces bill criminalizing some forms of 'hate speech'

“2-4 million people will die if we don’t lockdown!!” -literally every news agency during Covid.

Misinformation!!

Jail them.

originally posted by: PurpleFox
“2-4 million people will die if we don’t lockdown!!” -literally every news agency during Covid.

Misinformation!!

Jail them.

Yeah, it doesn't work that way.

The powerful and the politicians and corporations decide "what" is misinformation and hate speech. Generally anything that exposes them, impacts their profits, or goes against the leftist narratives.

Who gets to decide what constitutes 'hate speech'? Where are these 'European laws', soon to be implemented in the U.S. coming from?
The United Nations

Yes, the U.N.
The same wise, benevolent leaders who appointed China, Cuba, and Pakistan to its Human Rights Council

Human rights violations in Pakistan

Human rights violations in Cuba

China's human rights violations include mass arbitrary detention, torture, enforced disappearances, mass surveillance, cultural and religious persecution...

And these WEF pieces of sh!t are throwing a hissy fit over 'hate speech' and 'misinformation'.

a reply to: infolurker

I mean… I’m not too worried.

1. EU commissioner VP said.
2. Even if there were enough woke people on congress and senate, it would be reversed by Supreme Court.
3. Even if it did happen, I’d just change my pronouns to fa**ot/retard and make an online community swearing it’s their kink and identity. Then sue people who don’t play ball.

a reply to: infolurker

The WEF does not understand that document that says the US government can't do that.

Then again the WEF misunderstands how a lot of things work.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Well, there are plenty of men claiming to be lesbians or transgender lesbians so there is that. Here is a list of some of the sick ones who like to rape women.

www.breitbart.com...

www.womenarehuman.com...

www.thesun.co.uk...

www.foxnews.com...

nypost.com...

thenewamerican.com...

www.womenarehuman.com...


But anyway, here is a great example of what they prosecute you for:

Trans Extremist Gets Woman Charged with Hate Crime for Pic of Women’s Suffrage Ribbons Continue reading Trans Extremist Gets Woman Charged with Hate Crime for Pic of Women’s Suffrage Ribbons

www.womenarehuman.com...

A 50-year-old mother-of-two has been charged with a hate crime after an extremist transgender advocate reported her to police for retweeting a photograph of green, white and violet women’s suffrage ribbons.

Following complaints from transgender activists, a GoFundMe campaign created to raise funding to cover Ms Millar’s legal expenses was shut down and all donations refunded to Ms Millar’s supporters. The campaign had raised £14k in 3 hours.

Ms Millar later began accepting donations through Paypal, but the account was locked for suspicious activity, presumably because the account was mass-reported.

“The past few weeks have been a nightmare for Marion and her family and it seems there is no end in sight,” a For Women Scotland spokeswoman said. “Sadly, in Scotland, it seems both free speech and women’s rights are under attack.”

Many are showing support of Ms Millar on social media under the hashtag #WomenWontWheesht, and using an image of women’s suffrage ribbons for an avatar or primary profile picture. There was also backlash against Ms Millar and her supporters from the transgender-identifying community.

She is not the first person in the UK to face legal prosecution for displaying defiance to gender identity ideology on social media. Katie Scottow of Hertfordshire, England was convicted of the offense of Persistently Making Use Of A Public Communications Network To Cause Annoyance, Inconvenience, And Anxiety following 2018 tweets in which she used male pronouns to refer to transgender-identifying advocate Stephanie Hayden, and called the advocate a “pig in a wig.” Ms Scottow was fined £1,000 and handed a two-year conditional discharge. She successfully appealed the conviction in December.

a reply to: ColeYounger

The US is following the new world order agenda remember what Daddy bush of GW Bush said during at a UN speech years ago?

a reply to: infolurker

Well that Means they Somehow Think they Have a Way to Neutralize the U.S. Constitution and the Bill Of Rights ? If so , then that would be an Outright Declaration of War Against the American People . NEVER Going to Happen ...........

If 'illegal hate speech' comes to America us ATS posters will be having one heck of an in-person reunion in Gitmo.

a reply to: nugget1

Haha,

I would simply stop posting.

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

IMO, TPTB won't have to neutralize, or circumvent the Constitution.
They have other ways of subjugating us.
They are already implementing their ESG mandates. It's here. All the big financial institutions are putting them in place. Other corporations will have to play ball or they'll be shut out.


If you don't play by their rules, you won't be able to earn a living. You'll be canceled. They don't have to arrest you or incarcerate you. There's no need. They'll use 'soft tyranny'.

a reply to: ColeYounger

In that Case , then It's On . Some of US Will Not Go Quietly ..............

a reply to: ColeYounger
They are programming us to have " twisted minds " . Easier to control that way.

originally posted by: musicismagic
a reply to: ColeYounger
They are programming us to have " twisted minds " . Easier to control that way.

NOTHING Wrong With Me...................

"Hate speech" = censoring anything that isn't an approved narrative.

"You must hate people if you are spreading disinfo."

a reply to: infolurker

Listen to her cackle as she talks about sh!tting on the US' constitution...

They want there to be at least two americas. They will push us until we break.

How much crap will you endure on yourself and your family before men stand up to it?

They don’t have to change the Constitution, just adjust things on the SCOTUS