It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: IAMTAT
Are we sure that it's Joe that wants the second term or Dr. Jill? I'm not sure Joe is capable of getting much of anything at this point beyond maybe that he made boom-boom in his pants.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: ATruGod
That’s what I don’t get about the whole Trump case, he must of known they could get him into trouble and that the authorities knew he had them. But he just held onto them anyway.
I mean why? Was it pure stubbornness, or did they have some kind of sentimental value or something? It makes no sense.
I’m just curious of the possible motive he had for wanting to be in possession of these documents.
How do you explain the Biden case? Which is actually worse than what Trump supposedly did.
A Vice President does not have the same authority to declassify documents that a President does.
Care to make an attempt to explain it from a Pro-Dem point of view without sounding like a hypocrite?
It doesn’t seem like such a huge deal to me in either case. But Biden did hand them over voluntarily before they even knew he had them.
Where as Trump for some odd reason wanted to hold onto them even though they knew he had them and even told him there had to be a lock on the door where they were stored… I mean at that point why didn’t he say “take the documents, I already read them anyway”?
What was the benefit in keeping them?
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Subaeruginosa
Added: Hearing a whistleblower gave all of it up, and (R)s know the whole story. Very Serious 🤐
edit on Jan-11-2023 by xuenchen because: ⭕️🤡⭕️
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: IAMTAT
Are we sure that it's Joe that wants the second term or Dr. Jill? I'm not sure Joe is capable of getting much of anything at this point beyond maybe that he made boom-boom in his pants.
We are learning that the lawyer that "discovered" the first batch of Joe's classified docs at Penn Biden Center had Obama officiate her wedding...and the Archives librarian she called is a huge Obama supporter.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Subaeruginosa
Added: Hearing a whistleblower gave all of it up, and (R)s know the whole story. Very Serious 🤐
edit on Jan-11-2023 by xuenchen because: ⭕️🤡⭕️
That explains (some of) what Senator Ron Johnson was referring to last month when stating FBI Whistleblowers are coming to him with STUNNING information.
Also why AG Garland told all employees at the DOJ to stop Whistleblowing to members of Congress.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: IAMTAT
Are we sure that it's Joe that wants the second term or Dr. Jill? I'm not sure Joe is capable of getting much of anything at this point beyond maybe that he made boom-boom in his pants.
We are learning that the lawyer that "discovered" the first batch of Joe's classified docs at Penn Biden Center had Obama officiate her wedding...and the Archives librarian she called is a huge Obama supporter.
Michael Obama wants to run in 2024, but needs Joe out of the way, so the move doesn't look so cut-throat and treasonous against the Democratic party?
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Subaeruginosa
Added: Hearing a whistleblower gave all of it up, and (R)s know the whole story. Very Serious 🤐
edit on Jan-11-2023 by xuenchen because: ⭕️🤡⭕️
That explains (some of) what Senator Ron Johnson was referring to last month when stating FBI Whistleblowers are coming to him with STUNNING information.
Also why AG Garland told all employees at the DOJ to stop Whistleblowing to members of Congress.
BINGO! COVERALL Jackpot!
Hearing too that they went to DOJ/FBI but are getting little response and the "run-a-round-Sue" treatment. Explains why The Administration is being allowed to create a PR "Soft Landing" scenario. 😎
DOJ/FBI too heavily salted with Democrat covert agents 😎
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: IAMTAT
Are we sure that it's Joe that wants the second term or Dr. Jill? I'm not sure Joe is capable of getting much of anything at this point beyond maybe that he made boom-boom in his pants.
We are learning that the lawyer that "discovered" the first batch of Joe's classified docs at Penn Biden Center had Obama officiate her wedding...and the Archives librarian she called is a huge Obama supporter.
Michael Obama wants to run in 2024, but needs Joe out of the way, so the move doesn't look so cut-throat and treasonous against the Democratic party?
Dr. Jill just had a couple carcinomas removed.
Joe's exit (gracefully) ramp is now open.
I wonder if he'll take it.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: ATruGod
That’s what I don’t get about the whole Trump case, he must of known they could get him into trouble and that the authorities knew he had them. But he just held onto them anyway.
I mean why? Was it pure stubbornness, or did they have some kind of sentimental value or something? It makes no sense.
I’m just curious of the possible motive he had for wanting to be in possession of these documents.
How do you explain the Biden case? Which is actually worse than what Trump supposedly did.
A Vice President does not have the same authority to declassify documents that a President does.
Care to make an attempt to explain it from a Pro-Dem point of view without sounding like a hypocrite?
It doesn’t seem like such a huge deal to me in either case. But Biden did hand them over voluntarily before they even knew he had them.
Where as Trump for some odd reason wanted to hold onto them even though they knew he had them and even told him there had to be a lock on the door where they were stored… I mean at that point why didn’t he say “take the documents, I already read them anyway”?
What was the benefit in keeping them?
originally posted by: carewemust
The Biden PENN CENTER foundation wasn't built until 2018.
How did Joe Biden get access to Top Secret documents in 2018?
Did he carry them around in his briefcase for 2+ years before 2018?
Did he have "inside help" with obtaining the documents between 2018 and 2022?
Whatever... IT'S ALL CRIMINAL.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
Lol
Now “it’s not a big deal” cause Biden got caught.
You people are a laff riot
originally posted by: Thrumbo
He left them there on purpose to have a reason not to run for re-election after he became POTUS.
Now he's going to get into trouble over it, the GOP House is going to roast him for the rest of his presidency.
These things have all been planned out, they're just acting accordingly. Do you know how I know this? It's simple, I made it up. Sounds about right doesn't it?
This is all you have to do to create conspiracy theories. If you're someone with a following, your sheeple will run with it.
originally posted by: Annee
Human error
vs
Human intention
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Subaeruginosa
Added: Hearing a whistleblower gave all of it up, and (R)s know the whole story. Very Serious 🤐
edit on Jan-11-2023 by xuenchen because: ⭕️🤡⭕️
That explains (some of) what Senator Ron Johnson was referring to last month when stating FBI Whistleblowers are coming to him with STUNNING information.
Also why AG Garland told all employees at the DOJ to stop Whistleblowing to members of Congress.
originally posted by: carewemust
The Biden PENN CENTER foundation wasn't built until 2018.
How did Joe Biden get access to Top Secret documents in 2018?
Did he carry them around in his briefcase for 2+ years before 2018?
Did he have "inside help" with obtaining the documents between 2018 and 2022?
Whatever... IT'S ALL CRIMINAL.