Ozone layer recovers, limiting global warming by 0.5 Celsius

The ozone layer is just one factor in the very complex thing that is atmospheric science.



The UN would say just about anything to make us believe in anthropogenic climate change.

a reply to: Maxmars

There is also weakening of the North Atlantic Oscillation , says Professor Fritz Vahrenholt .

Winter is really coming



Europe’s Cooling: Over the next 15 to 20 years Europe will get colder

originally posted by: crayzeed
I will ask the question again because no one has given me a satisfactory answer.

Virtually all the "ozone depleting substances" and now past nuclear tests were all happening in the Northern part of the Northern Hemisphere, ie the "developed world, so how come the biggest and most "frightening" hole is over the South Pole and not the North Pole?
Did these substances decide to travel South and only attack Antarctica?

A lot of tests were conducted in the southern hemisphere.

There's more Ocean Southside so the the geniuses thought that splitting the atom in those areas wouldn't affect the rest of the world...

a reply to: NormalGuyCrazyWorld

Indeed.

Again, no mention of nukes on that chart.

It's like a blind spot in "The Science".

a reply to: Maxmars

Skip to the 1:44 mark to see how their report is an inaccurate fabrication and their assumptions are stupidly posted as fact. youtu.be...

a reply to: 727Sky

Well doesn't that change the landscape a bit? I would have been surprised if this hadn't made its' way forward in our conversation.

The truth is it feels like a shame that almost anything produced in the global forges has the stank of only a portion of this picture... the portion that let's them create the impression that they are the one's who can claim 'success?'

So what have we here in this video (for those who cannot view it at this time?)

The speaker clarifies that the sun's UV emanations is in large part the force that makes the ozone layer happen in the first place. That while airborne pollutants do affect the ozone layer, the overall impact is only a fraction of what they sun itself is responsible for. The presence of the cyclical solar maximum and minimum is more likely to be the causative factor for the shrinking of the ozone layer... and that because this is only the first year of the 11-year solar maximum period - it is imprudent to base a claim of "problem solved" on this issue; and even more egregious to presume the Montreal accord had anything to do with it at all.

I have to admit that the accord took place 1 year after the ozone hole started shrinking again... which kind of debunks the idea that they could effect a change with their words.

Thank you for the wrinkle... all that glossy perfection about how great the UN committee-based victory wasn't sitting well.