BREAKING - ICAN lawyers - obtain shocking AstraZeneca VACCINE study revelation

AstraZeneca study finds vector DNA in the sciatic nerve, bone marrow, liver, lungs, and spleen of vaccinated mice.

Because AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine is not licensed in the United States, all documents within the FDA’s possession concerning this vaccine are exempt from disclosure. This means that anyone who received an AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine cannot – and might not ever be able to – access any of the data concerning the vaccine from the US government.

Not satisfied by this complete lack of transparency, ICAN, through its attorneys, submitted an information request to the United Kingdom’s FDA equivalent – the Medicines and Healthcare Products Registry Agency (MHRA) -- in April 2022 seeking information relating to its authorization of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, as well as that relating to its authorization of the Janssen, Moderna , and PfizerCOVID-19 vaccines.

MHRA’s initial response was to threaten to deny ICAN’s request but, after ICAN pushed back and, in the case of the AstraZeneca vaccine, narrowed the scope of the request to seven specific items related to safety testing, MHRA dropped its objection. MHRA recently provided 166 pages of records containing the studies MHRA relied on to authorize AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine.

One of these studies investigated biodistribution of the AstraZeneca vaccine, meaning where it goes in the body after injection, in mice. This study revealed that the viral vector DNA did not remain localized in the injection site but instead migrated to other organs. Disturbingly, the study found vector DNA in the sciatic nerves, bone marrow, livers, lungs, and spleens of the mice following vaccination.

The study documents further revealed that, in early 2021, AstraZeneca was forced to amend its data sheet for the vaccine after concluding that there may have been a causal association between the vaccine and serious hypersensitivity including anaphylaxis.

Another perhaps unsurprising revelation was the inclusion of a disclaimer that a number of vulnerable populations, such as pregnant and lactating women and immunocompromised persons, were excluded from pre-market human safety studies. In its Marketing Authorization Application, AstraZeneca stated that because these populations were excluded from the studies, the safety of the vaccine in these groups was unknown. This also led the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) to recommend against the AstraZeneca vaccine for pregnant women – a sentiment that was echoed in the UK’s vaccination schedule guide, commonly referred to as the “Green Book.”

A final shocking revelation in the documents was the heavily redacted discussion of two individuals who developed serious immune-mediated neurological demyelinating conditions following vaccination. Although it states there was “no evidence suggesting a causal relationship” between the vaccine and these events, the UK’s clinical overview conceded that “vaccinations could be associated with immune-mediated neurological conditions” and therefore these adverse events were included as an important potential risk in the vaccine’s risk management plan.

In the coming weeks, MHRA is expected to produce additional documents regarding its authorization of the other COVID-19 vaccines.

SOURCE: h ttps://icandecide.org/press-release/ican-obtains-disturbing-information-about-astrazenecas-covid-19-vaccine-from-the-uk-equivalent-of-the-fda/

If anyone really believes that Fauci or Gates or Biden or any of the politicians or celebrities actually took this shot, well, I just don't know what to tell you.

All of those celebrities that faked the shot on social media as well as all of the politicians and world leaders and CEOs and scientists that faked getting the shot should be held accountable for misleading the public in a tribunal.

edit: Even Trump probably faked getting this shot, so add him to the list too.

a reply to: AuditTheAudit

Just read this report from the Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHPRA) in the U.K. and it reports that they are actively and frequently monitoring adverse reactions to all the vaccines.

In addition to the specific safety topics summarised in this report, a range of other isolated
events or series of reports of non-fatal, serious suspected ADRs have been reported. These
all remain under continual review, including thorough analysis of expected rates in the
absence of vaccine. There are currently no indications of specific patterns or rates of
reporting that would suggest the vaccine has played a role.

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk... eporting_23.11.2022.pdf

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
If anyone really believes that Fauci or Gates or Biden or any of the politicians or celebrities actually took this shot, well, I just don't know what to tell you.

All of those celebrities that faked the shot on social media as well as all of the politicians and world leaders and CEOs and scientists that faked getting the shot should be held accountable for misleading the public in a tribunal.

edit: Even Trump probably faked getting this shot, so add him to the list too.

Nope. The AstraZeneca shot was not available in the US when Fauci, Gates, Biden and Trump got vaccinated. They would have used one of the mRNA vaccines. The AstraZeneca Vaccine is a viral vector vaccine.

originally posted by: AuditTheAudit
AstraZeneca study finds vector DNA in the sciatic nerve, bone marrow, liver, lungs, and spleen of vaccinated mice.

Because AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine is not licensed in the United States, all documents within the FDA’s possession concerning this vaccine are exempt from disclosure. This means that anyone who received an AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine cannot – and might not ever be able to – access any of the data concerning the vaccine from the US government.

Not satisfied by this complete lack of transparency, ICAN, through its attorneys, submitted an information request to the United Kingdom’s FDA equivalent – the Medicines and Healthcare Products Registry Agency (MHRA) -- in April 2022 seeking information relating to its authorization of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, as well as that relating to its authorization of the Janssen, Moderna , and PfizerCOVID-19 vaccines.

MHRA’s initial response was to threaten to deny ICAN’s request but, after ICAN pushed back and, in the case of the AstraZeneca vaccine, narrowed the scope of the request to seven specific items related to safety testing, MHRA dropped its objection. MHRA recently provided 166 pages of records containing the studies MHRA relied on to authorize AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine.

One of these studies investigated biodistribution of the AstraZeneca vaccine, meaning where it goes in the body after injection, in mice. This study revealed that the viral vector DNA did not remain localized in the injection site but instead migrated to other organs. Disturbingly, the study found vector DNA in the sciatic nerves, bone marrow, livers, lungs, and spleens of the mice following vaccination.

The study documents further revealed that, in early 2021, AstraZeneca was forced to amend its data sheet for the vaccine after concluding that there may have been a causal association between the vaccine and serious hypersensitivity including anaphylaxis.

Another perhaps unsurprising revelation was the inclusion of a disclaimer that a number of vulnerable populations, such as pregnant and lactating women and immunocompromised persons, were excluded from pre-market human safety studies. In its Marketing Authorization Application, AstraZeneca stated that because these populations were excluded from the studies, the safety of the vaccine in these groups was unknown. This also led the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) to recommend against the AstraZeneca vaccine for pregnant women – a sentiment that was echoed in the UK’s vaccination schedule guide, commonly referred to as the “Green Book.”

A final shocking revelation in the documents was the heavily redacted discussion of two individuals who developed serious immune-mediated neurological demyelinating conditions following vaccination. Although it states there was “no evidence suggesting a causal relationship” between the vaccine and these events, the UK’s clinical overview conceded that “vaccinations could be associated with immune-mediated neurological conditions” and therefore these adverse events were included as an important potential risk in the vaccine’s risk management plan.

In the coming weeks, MHRA is expected to produce additional documents regarding its authorization of the other COVID-19 vaccines.

SOURCE: h ttps://icandecide.org/press-release/ican-obtains-disturbing-information-about-astrazenecas-covid-19-vaccine-from-the-uk-equivalent-of-the-fda/

This is a viral vector vaccine. It uses a neutralized Chimpanzee Adenovirus shell to deliver the Covid antigen. Adenoviruses are DNA viruses. They can go to any tissue in the human body that is capable of hosting them and then leave traces of their DNA behind once they are no longer active. Adenoviruses are known to have a high level of tissue tropism--which means that they can infect a large range of human tissues. This is actually one reason they are useful as vaccine vectors. This is neither "shocking" nor "disturbing". It's pretty much what you would expect from an Adenovirus Vector.

a reply to: AuditTheAudit

It isn't surprising that pregnant women were excluded from testing. That is pretty well routine with any new pharma agent. It is pretty universally accepted that this is unethical because it means testing on the unborn (you know those who aren't human and yet strangely are for some purposes like this one).

However, that also meant it should not have been pushed on pregnant women at all or advertised as safe for them. Any pregnant women who got it (those who didn't know they were pregnant during vaccination) become the unwitting test subjects and that's how our knowledge on pharma safety slowly builds over time. Most women who are thinking of getting pregnant are advised to get their vaccinations updated with a relevant window *before* trying to to get pregnant.

I could see this being over-ridden in a true life or death emergency, but COVID wasn't really that, was it?

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: AuditTheAudit
AstraZeneca study finds vector DNA in the sciatic nerve, bone marrow, liver, lungs, and spleen of vaccinated mice.

Because AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine is not licensed in the United States, all documents within the FDA’s possession concerning this vaccine are exempt from disclosure. This means that anyone who received an AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine cannot – and might not ever be able to – access any of the data concerning the vaccine from the US government.

Not satisfied by this complete lack of transparency, ICAN, through its attorneys, submitted an information request to the United Kingdom’s FDA equivalent – the Medicines and Healthcare Products Registry Agency (MHRA) -- in April 2022 seeking information relating to its authorization of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, as well as that relating to its authorization of the Janssen, Moderna , and PfizerCOVID-19 vaccines.

MHRA’s initial response was to threaten to deny ICAN’s request but, after ICAN pushed back and, in the case of the AstraZeneca vaccine, narrowed the scope of the request to seven specific items related to safety testing, MHRA dropped its objection. MHRA recently provided 166 pages of records containing the studies MHRA relied on to authorize AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine.

One of these studies investigated biodistribution of the AstraZeneca vaccine, meaning where it goes in the body after injection, in mice. This study revealed that the viral vector DNA did not remain localized in the injection site but instead migrated to other organs. Disturbingly, the study found vector DNA in the sciatic nerves, bone marrow, livers, lungs, and spleens of the mice following vaccination.

The study documents further revealed that, in early 2021, AstraZeneca was forced to amend its data sheet for the vaccine after concluding that there may have been a causal association between the vaccine and serious hypersensitivity including anaphylaxis.

Another perhaps unsurprising revelation was the inclusion of a disclaimer that a number of vulnerable populations, such as pregnant and lactating women and immunocompromised persons, were excluded from pre-market human safety studies. In its Marketing Authorization Application, AstraZeneca stated that because these populations were excluded from the studies, the safety of the vaccine in these groups was unknown. This also led the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) to recommend against the AstraZeneca vaccine for pregnant women – a sentiment that was echoed in the UK’s vaccination schedule guide, commonly referred to as the “Green Book.”

A final shocking revelation in the documents was the heavily redacted discussion of two individuals who developed serious immune-mediated neurological demyelinating conditions following vaccination. Although it states there was “no evidence suggesting a causal relationship” between the vaccine and these events, the UK’s clinical overview conceded that “vaccinations could be associated with immune-mediated neurological conditions” and therefore these adverse events were included as an important potential risk in the vaccine’s risk management plan.

In the coming weeks, MHRA is expected to produce additional documents regarding its authorization of the other COVID-19 vaccines.

SOURCE: h ttps://icandecide.org/press-release/ican-obtains-disturbing-information-about-astrazenecas-covid-19-vaccine-from-the-uk-equivalent-of-the-fda/

This is a viral vector vaccine. It uses a neutralized Chimpanzee Adenovirus shell to deliver the Covid antigen. Adenoviruses are DNA viruses. They can go to any tissue in the human body that is capable of hosting them and then leave traces of their DNA behind once they are no longer active. Adenoviruses are known to have a high level of tissue tropism--which means that they can infect a large range of human tissues. This is actually one reason they are useful as vaccine vectors. This is neither "shocking" nor "disturbing". It's pretty much what you would expect from an Adenovirus Vector.

I think what's even more shocking is how denialists are apologists for big pharma and government experimental drugs regardless of how many people they injure or kill and regardless of the mountains of evidence showing that every aspect of the pandemic from the bioweapon virus to the clot shot vaccines have been lied about from the begining. It's like a broken record of lies and deceit.

Not to forget the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from the country that has produced it which is the UK and also withdrawn from most other countries that have used it. In a few words, the vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the market due to its serious adverse reactions. Mainly blood clots.

The vaccine was branded 'safe and effective' and a miracle that has saved many many lives. Well...such a safe and effective vaccine to be withdrawn from the various countries that have used it leads to a contradiction.

I have created a thread in relation to a family who has taken legal action after their son died from the Astrazeneca vaccine. It's an actual case of vaccine injury verified by the coroner.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are many other cases of serious injuries and deaths by the Astrazeneca vaccine.

You may have noticed the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth, find it increasingly difficult to defend their already indefensible positions.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Not to forget the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from the country that has produced it which is the UK and also withdrawn from most other countries that have used it. In a few words, the vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the market due to its serious adverse reactions. Mainly blood clots.

The vaccine was branded 'safe and effective' and a miracle that has saved many many lives. Well...such a safe and effective vaccine to be withdrawn from the various countries that have used it leads to a contradiction.

I have created a thread in relation to a family who has taken legal action after their son died from the Astrazeneca vaccine. It's an actual case of vaccine injury verified by the coroner.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are many other cases of serious injuries and deaths by the Astrazeneca vaccine.

You may have noticed the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth, find it increasingly difficult to defend their already indefensible positions.

This article explains what happened with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is now replaced with the Novavax vaccine. It is not a matter of defending positions, but rather of understanding the science.

Study shows risk of blood clots is far greater from coronavirus than the vaccine
A study by the University of Oxford shows that having Covid-19 puts you at a much higher risk of developing dangerous blood clots than the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccines.

The study, based on the health records of 29.1 million people in England, suggests while there is a slightly increased risk of developing low platelet levels and blood clots in the veins after a first dose of AstraZeneca, being infected with the virus raises this risk much more, and for longer.

The researchers estimate that for every 10 million people who are vaccinated with AstraZeneca, there are 66 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and seven extra cases of a rare type of blood clot in the brain. Infection with Covid-19 is estimated to cause 12,614 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and 20 cases of rare blood clots in the brain.

This research is more evidence that the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risks for most people.

www.bhf.org.uk...

osf.io...

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Not to forget the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from the country that has produced it which is the UK and also withdrawn from most other countries that have used it. In a few words, the vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the market due to its serious adverse reactions. Mainly blood clots.

The vaccine was branded 'safe and effective' and a miracle that has saved many many lives. Well...such a safe and effective vaccine to be withdrawn from the various countries that have used it leads to a contradiction.

I have created a thread in relation to a family who has taken legal action after their son died from the Astrazeneca vaccine. It's an actual case of vaccine injury verified by the coroner.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are many other cases of serious injuries and deaths by the Astrazeneca vaccine.

You may have noticed the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth, find it increasingly difficult to defend their already indefensible positions.

This article explains what happened with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is now replaced with the Novavax vaccine. It is not a matter of defending positions, but rather of understanding the science.

Study shows risk of blood clots is far greater from coronavirus than the vaccine
A study by the University of Oxford shows that having Covid-19 puts you at a much higher risk of developing dangerous blood clots than the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccines.

The study, based on the health records of 29.1 million people in England, suggests while there is a slightly increased risk of developing low platelet levels and blood clots in the veins after a first dose of AstraZeneca, being infected with the virus raises this risk much more, and for longer.

The researchers estimate that for every 10 million people who are vaccinated with AstraZeneca, there are 66 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and seven extra cases of a rare type of blood clot in the brain. Infection with Covid-19 is estimated to cause 12,614 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and 20 cases of rare blood clots in the brain.

This research is more evidence that the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risks for most people.

www.bhf.org.uk...

osf.io...

We have all understood the 'science' very well apart from the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Not to forget the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from the country that has produced it which is the UK and also withdrawn from most other countries that have used it. In a few words, the vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the market due to its serious adverse reactions. Mainly blood clots.

The vaccine was branded 'safe and effective' and a miracle that has saved many many lives. Well...such a safe and effective vaccine to be withdrawn from the various countries that have used it leads to a contradiction.

I have created a thread in relation to a family who has taken legal action after their son died from the Astrazeneca vaccine. It's an actual case of vaccine injury verified by the coroner.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are many other cases of serious injuries and deaths by the Astrazeneca vaccine.

You may have noticed the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth, find it increasingly difficult to defend their already indefensible positions.

This article explains what happened with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is now replaced with the Novavax vaccine. It is not a matter of defending positions, but rather of understanding the science.

Study shows risk of blood clots is far greater from coronavirus than the vaccine
A study by the University of Oxford shows that having Covid-19 puts you at a much higher risk of developing dangerous blood clots than the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccines.

The study, based on the health records of 29.1 million people in England, suggests while there is a slightly increased risk of developing low platelet levels and blood clots in the veins after a first dose of AstraZeneca, being infected with the virus raises this risk much more, and for longer.

The researchers estimate that for every 10 million people who are vaccinated with AstraZeneca, there are 66 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and seven extra cases of a rare type of blood clot in the brain. Infection with Covid-19 is estimated to cause 12,614 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and 20 cases of rare blood clots in the brain.

This research is more evidence that the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risks for most people.

www.bhf.org.uk...

osf.io...

We have all understood the 'science' very well apart from the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth.

Who is into denial about this is another thread.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Not to forget the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from the country that has produced it which is the UK and also withdrawn from most other countries that have used it. In a few words, the vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the market due to its serious adverse reactions. Mainly blood clots.

The vaccine was branded 'safe and effective' and a miracle that has saved many many lives. Well...such a safe and effective vaccine to be withdrawn from the various countries that have used it leads to a contradiction.

I have created a thread in relation to a family who has taken legal action after their son died from the Astrazeneca vaccine. It's an actual case of vaccine injury verified by the coroner.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are many other cases of serious injuries and deaths by the Astrazeneca vaccine.

You may have noticed the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth, find it increasingly difficult to defend their already indefensible positions.

This article explains what happened with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is now replaced with the Novavax vaccine. It is not a matter of defending positions, but rather of understanding the science.

Study shows risk of blood clots is far greater from coronavirus than the vaccine
A study by the University of Oxford shows that having Covid-19 puts you at a much higher risk of developing dangerous blood clots than the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccines.

The study, based on the health records of 29.1 million people in England, suggests while there is a slightly increased risk of developing low platelet levels and blood clots in the veins after a first dose of AstraZeneca, being infected with the virus raises this risk much more, and for longer.

The researchers estimate that for every 10 million people who are vaccinated with AstraZeneca, there are 66 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and seven extra cases of a rare type of blood clot in the brain. Infection with Covid-19 is estimated to cause 12,614 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and 20 cases of rare blood clots in the brain.

This research is more evidence that the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risks for most people.

www.bhf.org.uk...

osf.io...

We have all understood the 'science' very well apart from the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth.

Who is into denial about this is another thread.

Yes another thread. But the vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality are constant and are seen usually in all threads.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Not to forget the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from the country that has produced it which is the UK and also withdrawn from most other countries that have used it. In a few words, the vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the market due to its serious adverse reactions. Mainly blood clots.

The vaccine was branded 'safe and effective' and a miracle that has saved many many lives. Well...such a safe and effective vaccine to be withdrawn from the various countries that have used it leads to a contradiction.

I have created a thread in relation to a family who has taken legal action after their son died from the Astrazeneca vaccine. It's an actual case of vaccine injury verified by the coroner.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are many other cases of serious injuries and deaths by the Astrazeneca vaccine.

You may have noticed the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth, find it increasingly difficult to defend their already indefensible positions.

This article explains what happened with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is now replaced with the Novavax vaccine. It is not a matter of defending positions, but rather of understanding the science.

Study shows risk of blood clots is far greater from coronavirus than the vaccine
A study by the University of Oxford shows that having Covid-19 puts you at a much higher risk of developing dangerous blood clots than the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccines.

The study, based on the health records of 29.1 million people in England, suggests while there is a slightly increased risk of developing low platelet levels and blood clots in the veins after a first dose of AstraZeneca, being infected with the virus raises this risk much more, and for longer.

The researchers estimate that for every 10 million people who are vaccinated with AstraZeneca, there are 66 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and seven extra cases of a rare type of blood clot in the brain. Infection with Covid-19 is estimated to cause 12,614 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and 20 cases of rare blood clots in the brain.

This research is more evidence that the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risks for most people.

www.bhf.org.uk...

osf.io...

We have all understood the 'science' very well apart from the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth.

Who is into denial about this is another thread.

Yes another thread. But the vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality are constant and are seen usually in all threads.

I haven't seen any of those, I've only seen some people looking at all sides and trying to find the truth while others cling onto their anti-vax beliefs and refuse to accept new findings by many medical and scientific studies.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Not to forget the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from the country that has produced it which is the UK and also withdrawn from most other countries that have used it. In a few words, the vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the market due to its serious adverse reactions. Mainly blood clots.

The vaccine was branded 'safe and effective' and a miracle that has saved many many lives. Well...such a safe and effective vaccine to be withdrawn from the various countries that have used it leads to a contradiction.

I have created a thread in relation to a family who has taken legal action after their son died from the Astrazeneca vaccine. It's an actual case of vaccine injury verified by the coroner.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are many other cases of serious injuries and deaths by the Astrazeneca vaccine.

You may have noticed the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth, find it increasingly difficult to defend their already indefensible positions.

This article explains what happened with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is now replaced with the Novavax vaccine. It is not a matter of defending positions, but rather of understanding the science.

Study shows risk of blood clots is far greater from coronavirus than the vaccine
A study by the University of Oxford shows that having Covid-19 puts you at a much higher risk of developing dangerous blood clots than the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccines.

The study, based on the health records of 29.1 million people in England, suggests while there is a slightly increased risk of developing low platelet levels and blood clots in the veins after a first dose of AstraZeneca, being infected with the virus raises this risk much more, and for longer.

The researchers estimate that for every 10 million people who are vaccinated with AstraZeneca, there are 66 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and seven extra cases of a rare type of blood clot in the brain. Infection with Covid-19 is estimated to cause 12,614 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and 20 cases of rare blood clots in the brain.

This research is more evidence that the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risks for most people.

www.bhf.org.uk...

osf.io...

We have all understood the 'science' very well apart from the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth.

Who is into denial about this is another thread.

Yes another thread. But the vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality are constant and are seen usually in all threads.

I haven't seen any of those, I've only seen some people looking at all sides and trying to find the truth while others cling onto their anti-vax beliefs and refuse to accept new findings by many medical and scientific studies.

The entire site is full of vaccine apologists and denialists of reality. You may have to look closer and be more careful. In this site I don't think anyone who has looked at the evidence still thinks the vaccines are 'safe and effective'. Only vaccine apologists have these views or those who can't change their minds as they have emotionally invested in these products.

The Astrazeneca vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the UK and most countries that have used it. Far from being a success. You don't really need links to see why. Just use common sense. What 'safe and effective' vaccine which is cheap and has saved so many lives will be withdrawn from the market??

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Not to forget the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from the country that has produced it which is the UK and also withdrawn from most other countries that have used it. In a few words, the vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the market due to its serious adverse reactions. Mainly blood clots.

The vaccine was branded 'safe and effective' and a miracle that has saved many many lives. Well...such a safe and effective vaccine to be withdrawn from the various countries that have used it leads to a contradiction.

I have created a thread in relation to a family who has taken legal action after their son died from the Astrazeneca vaccine. It's an actual case of vaccine injury verified by the coroner.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are many other cases of serious injuries and deaths by the Astrazeneca vaccine.

You may have noticed the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth, find it increasingly difficult to defend their already indefensible positions.

This article explains what happened with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is now replaced with the Novavax vaccine. It is not a matter of defending positions, but rather of understanding the science.

Study shows risk of blood clots is far greater from coronavirus than the vaccine
A study by the University of Oxford shows that having Covid-19 puts you at a much higher risk of developing dangerous blood clots than the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccines.

The study, based on the health records of 29.1 million people in England, suggests while there is a slightly increased risk of developing low platelet levels and blood clots in the veins after a first dose of AstraZeneca, being infected with the virus raises this risk much more, and for longer.

The researchers estimate that for every 10 million people who are vaccinated with AstraZeneca, there are 66 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and seven extra cases of a rare type of blood clot in the brain. Infection with Covid-19 is estimated to cause 12,614 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and 20 cases of rare blood clots in the brain.

This research is more evidence that the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risks for most people.

www.bhf.org.uk...

osf.io...

We have all understood the 'science' very well apart from the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth.

Who is into denial about this is another thread.

Yes another thread. But the vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality are constant and are seen usually in all threads.

I haven't seen any of those, I've only seen some people looking at all sides and trying to find the truth while others cling onto their anti-vax beliefs and refuse to accept new findings by many medical and scientific studies.

The entire site is full of vaccine apologists and denialists of reality. You may have to look closer and be more careful. In this site I don't think anyone who has looked at the evidence still thinks the vaccines are 'safe and effective'. Only vaccine apologists have these views or those who can't change their minds as they have emotionally invested in these products.

The Astrazeneca vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the UK and most countries that have used it. Far from being a success. You don't really need links to see why. Just use common sense. What 'safe and effective' vaccine which is cheap and has saved so many lives will be withdrawn from the market??

They replaced it with another vaccine that works the same way because they are constantly monitoring adverse side effects and developing new vaccines that may be safer, but from the source I posted above, the numbers in the U.K. still show far less blot clots and strokes from blood clots from vaccines like AstraZeneca than getting the actual virus. And, in the future, should new findings with the mRNA vaccines show the need to develop new vaccines, they will do that too, this is war.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Not to forget the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from the country that has produced it which is the UK and also withdrawn from most other countries that have used it. In a few words, the vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the market due to its serious adverse reactions. Mainly blood clots.

The vaccine was branded 'safe and effective' and a miracle that has saved many many lives. Well...such a safe and effective vaccine to be withdrawn from the various countries that have used it leads to a contradiction.

I have created a thread in relation to a family who has taken legal action after their son died from the Astrazeneca vaccine. It's an actual case of vaccine injury verified by the coroner.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are many other cases of serious injuries and deaths by the Astrazeneca vaccine.

You may have noticed the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth, find it increasingly difficult to defend their already indefensible positions.

This article explains what happened with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is now replaced with the Novavax vaccine. It is not a matter of defending positions, but rather of understanding the science.

Study shows risk of blood clots is far greater from coronavirus than the vaccine
A study by the University of Oxford shows that having Covid-19 puts you at a much higher risk of developing dangerous blood clots than the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccines.

The study, based on the health records of 29.1 million people in England, suggests while there is a slightly increased risk of developing low platelet levels and blood clots in the veins after a first dose of AstraZeneca, being infected with the virus raises this risk much more, and for longer.

The researchers estimate that for every 10 million people who are vaccinated with AstraZeneca, there are 66 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and seven extra cases of a rare type of blood clot in the brain. Infection with Covid-19 is estimated to cause 12,614 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and 20 cases of rare blood clots in the brain.

This research is more evidence that the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risks for most people.

www.bhf.org.uk...

osf.io...

We have all understood the 'science' very well apart from the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth.

Who is into denial about this is another thread.

Yes another thread. But the vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality are constant and are seen usually in all threads.

I haven't seen any of those, I've only seen some people looking at all sides and trying to find the truth while others cling onto their anti-vax beliefs and refuse to accept new findings by many medical and scientific studies.

The entire site is full of vaccine apologists and denialists of reality. You may have to look closer and be more careful. In this site I don't think anyone who has looked at the evidence still thinks the vaccines are 'safe and effective'. Only vaccine apologists have these views or those who can't change their minds as they have emotionally invested in these products.

The Astrazeneca vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the UK and most countries that have used it. Far from being a success. You don't really need links to see why. Just use common sense. What 'safe and effective' vaccine which is cheap and has saved so many lives will be withdrawn from the market??

They replaced it with another vaccine that works the same way because they are constantly monitoring adverse side effects and developing new vaccines that may be safer, but from the source I posted above, the numbers in the U.K. still show far less blot clots and strokes from blood clots from vaccines like AstraZeneca than getting the actual virus. And, in the future, should new findings with the mRNA vaccines show the need to develop new vaccines, they will do that too, this is war.

Where did they replace it? It doesn't exist anymore in the UK and in most other countries. They have stopped the roll out due to serious adverse reactions.

If the vaccine is 'safe and effective' why is no longer in the UK market or in most other markets?

We need common sense here. Not links with no answers. What is your answer to the above question?

No vaccine apologies please.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Not to forget the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from the country that has produced it which is the UK and also withdrawn from most other countries that have used it. In a few words, the vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the market due to its serious adverse reactions. Mainly blood clots.

The vaccine was branded 'safe and effective' and a miracle that has saved many many lives. Well...such a safe and effective vaccine to be withdrawn from the various countries that have used it leads to a contradiction.

I have created a thread in relation to a family who has taken legal action after their son died from the Astrazeneca vaccine. It's an actual case of vaccine injury verified by the coroner.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are many other cases of serious injuries and deaths by the Astrazeneca vaccine.

You may have noticed the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth, find it increasingly difficult to defend their already indefensible positions.

This article explains what happened with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is now replaced with the Novavax vaccine. It is not a matter of defending positions, but rather of understanding the science.

Study shows risk of blood clots is far greater from coronavirus than the vaccine
A study by the University of Oxford shows that having Covid-19 puts you at a much higher risk of developing dangerous blood clots than the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccines.

The study, based on the health records of 29.1 million people in England, suggests while there is a slightly increased risk of developing low platelet levels and blood clots in the veins after a first dose of AstraZeneca, being infected with the virus raises this risk much more, and for longer.

The researchers estimate that for every 10 million people who are vaccinated with AstraZeneca, there are 66 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and seven extra cases of a rare type of blood clot in the brain. Infection with Covid-19 is estimated to cause 12,614 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and 20 cases of rare blood clots in the brain.

This research is more evidence that the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risks for most people.

www.bhf.org.uk...

osf.io...

We have all understood the 'science' very well apart from the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth.

Who is into denial about this is another thread.

Yes another thread. But the vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality are constant and are seen usually in all threads.

I haven't seen any of those, I've only seen some people looking at all sides and trying to find the truth while others cling onto their anti-vax beliefs and refuse to accept new findings by many medical and scientific studies.

The entire site is full of vaccine apologists and denialists of reality. You may have to look closer and be more careful. In this site I don't think anyone who has looked at the evidence still thinks the vaccines are 'safe and effective'. Only vaccine apologists have these views or those who can't change their minds as they have emotionally invested in these products.

The Astrazeneca vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the UK and most countries that have used it. Far from being a success. You don't really need links to see why. Just use common sense. What 'safe and effective' vaccine which is cheap and has saved so many lives will be withdrawn from the market??

They replaced it with another vaccine that works the same way because they are constantly monitoring adverse side effects and developing new vaccines that may be safer, but from the source I posted above, the numbers in the U.K. still show far less blot clots and strokes from blood clots from vaccines like AstraZeneca than getting the actual virus. And, in the future, should new findings with the mRNA vaccines show the need to develop new vaccines, they will do that too, this is war.

Where did they replace it? It doesn't exist anymore in the UK and in most other countries. They have stopped the roll out due to serious adverse reactions.

If the vaccine is 'safe and effective' why is no longer in the UK market or in most other markets?

We need common sense here. Not links with no answers. What is your answer to the above question?

No vaccine apologies please.

If you start reading the sources I post you'd have all the answers to your questions. If, however, you skim through the sources with blinders on, then I can't help you understand anything.

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
Not to forget the Astrazeneca vaccine has been withdrawn from the country that has produced it which is the UK and also withdrawn from most other countries that have used it. In a few words, the vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the market due to its serious adverse reactions. Mainly blood clots.

The vaccine was branded 'safe and effective' and a miracle that has saved many many lives. Well...such a safe and effective vaccine to be withdrawn from the various countries that have used it leads to a contradiction.

I have created a thread in relation to a family who has taken legal action after their son died from the Astrazeneca vaccine. It's an actual case of vaccine injury verified by the coroner.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

There are many other cases of serious injuries and deaths by the Astrazeneca vaccine.

You may have noticed the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth, find it increasingly difficult to defend their already indefensible positions.

This article explains what happened with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is now replaced with the Novavax vaccine. It is not a matter of defending positions, but rather of understanding the science.

Study shows risk of blood clots is far greater from coronavirus than the vaccine
A study by the University of Oxford shows that having Covid-19 puts you at a much higher risk of developing dangerous blood clots than the AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccines.

The study, based on the health records of 29.1 million people in England, suggests while there is a slightly increased risk of developing low platelet levels and blood clots in the veins after a first dose of AstraZeneca, being infected with the virus raises this risk much more, and for longer.

The researchers estimate that for every 10 million people who are vaccinated with AstraZeneca, there are 66 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and seven extra cases of a rare type of blood clot in the brain. Infection with Covid-19 is estimated to cause 12,614 extra cases of blood clots in the veins and 20 cases of rare blood clots in the brain.

This research is more evidence that the benefits of the vaccine far outweigh the risks for most people.

www.bhf.org.uk...

osf.io...

We have all understood the 'science' very well apart from the vaccine apologists, defenders of the pharmaceuticals, and denialists of reality and truth.

Who is into denial about this is another thread.

Yes another thread. But the vaccine apologetics and denialism of reality are constant and are seen usually in all threads.

I haven't seen any of those, I've only seen some people looking at all sides and trying to find the truth while others cling onto their anti-vax beliefs and refuse to accept new findings by many medical and scientific studies.

The entire site is full of vaccine apologists and denialists of reality. You may have to look closer and be more careful. In this site I don't think anyone who has looked at the evidence still thinks the vaccines are 'safe and effective'. Only vaccine apologists have these views or those who can't change their minds as they have emotionally invested in these products.

The Astrazeneca vaccine was quitely but methodically withdrawn from the UK and most countries that have used it. Far from being a success. You don't really need links to see why. Just use common sense. What 'safe and effective' vaccine which is cheap and has saved so many lives will be withdrawn from the market??

They replaced it with another vaccine that works the same way because they are constantly monitoring adverse side effects and developing new vaccines that may be safer, but from the source I posted above, the numbers in the U.K. still show far less blot clots and strokes from blood clots from vaccines like AstraZeneca than getting the actual virus. And, in the future, should new findings with the mRNA vaccines show the need to develop new vaccines, they will do that too, this is war.

Where did they replace it? It doesn't exist anymore in the UK and in most other countries. They have stopped the roll out due to serious adverse reactions.

If the vaccine is 'safe and effective' why is no longer in the UK market or in most other markets?

We need common sense here. Not links with no answers. What is your answer to the above question?

No vaccine apologies please.

If you start reading the sources I post you'd have all the answers to your questions. If, however, you skim through the sources with blinders on, then I can't help you understand anything.

I want an answer on why the vaccine was withdrawn from the market in the UK and most other places they have used it. Your links don't provide such answers.

It's one of the same round as the one before where you were insisting about herd immunity... which cannot be achieved for the obvious reasons.

So my question to you again:

If the vaccine is 'safe and effective' why is no longer in the UK market or in most other markets? What is the logical explanation?

No vaccine apology please.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

As you know, they it was rolled out under emergency authorisation which required no alternative treatments to be in place to do so, yet things that had shown to be effective were shouted down as horse de-wormers..and intravenous vitamin C also proved very effective but weirdly enough from the start of the scamdemic, nothing was mentioned about basic and well known immune system benefits like vit c, zinc, fresh air, exercise etc..

Rather a fear campaign was pushed, extreme fear infected many people and that in turn affected their physical and mental health, domestic abuse went up, depression sky rocketed, alcohol and drug abuse increased etc..

It’s still to early to say what the long term affects of the vaccines will be, but mass sudden death for everyone who took them would be a little to obvious. Let’s just hope people’s immune systems find a way to adapt and function as nature made them too and just as important let’s hope this has woken enough people up to the vile, corrupt, profiteering MSM and puppet governments of TPTB.