It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Biden White House pressured Twitter to both “elevate” and “suppress” users based on their stances on COVID-19 — ultimately “censoring info that was true but inconvenient” to policy makers, according to the latest edition of the “Twitter files” revealed Monday.
The coercion campaign during the pandemic began with the Trump administration — which asked Twitter to crack down on stories about panic buying and “runs on grocery stores” in the early days of the outbreak — but was stepped up under Biden, whose administration was focused on the removal of “anti-vaxxer accounts,” according to The Free Press reporter David Zweig.
In a Slack message from April 2021, an unidentified Twitter employee said the adminstration “had one really tough question about why Alex Berenson hasn’t been kicked off from the platform
As recently as this month, Lauren Culbertson, Twitter’s head of US public policy, had detailed the White House’s pressure campaign in a series of meetings, according to Zweig.
Culbertson said in her notes that the Biden administration was “very angry” that Twitter had not taken more aggressive action in silencing vaccine critics and wanted the company to do more, files showed
originally posted by: beyondknowledge
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Isn't there a law against this 'Ministry of Truth" thing? You know, the Constitution.
originally posted by: beyondknowledge
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Isn't there a law against this 'Ministry of Truth" thing? You know, the Constitution.
originally posted by: ManSizedSquirrel
I’m waiting for the “it’s okay because it was happening to the other side and not my side…” crowd to jump in and explain why this okay. This is alarming and quite frightening to be honest.
originally posted by: LSU2018
originally posted by: beyondknowledge
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Isn't there a law against this 'Ministry of Truth" thing? You know, the Constitution.
Too many people in power right now, who swore an oath to protect the constitution, have spent most of their time breaking it. They get away with it because the loudest platform, the media, supports what they're doing and never call them out for it.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
Government censorship by the Biden administration to push an experimental drug on a trusting public is sick.
As are you who OPENLY AND VOCALLY supported such.
Own it
originally posted by: beyondknowledge
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Isn't there a law against this 'Ministry of Truth" thing? You know, the Constitution.
Last December he filed a federal lawsuit against the social media platform claiming his first amendment rights had been violated
In the lawsuit filed in District Court for Northern California, Berenson sought to be reinstated to Twitter and requested unspecified monetary damages over his ban which which began last August.
The parties have come to a mutually acceptable resolution. I have been reinstated. Twitter has acknowledged that my tweets should have not led to my suspension at that time,' Berenson wrote on his Substack page earlier this week.
'Twitter banned me after I got five strikes under its Covid-19 misinformation policy. Which meant I'd supposedly made 'claims of fact' that were 'demonstrably false or misleading' and 'likely to impact public safety or cause serious harm'. Now we come to find those tweets 'should not have led to my suspension'?' he wrote.
The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. -Richard Horton
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
What these clowns don't realize is that when the system collapses, the collapse with it.
Not only Alex Berenson was reinstated on twitter but he was also awarded a compensation because he was 'wrongly' banned from the platform
I hope everyone acts accordingly as there are several other platform that used the same tactics to censor free speech and deliberately suppress the truth.
Among those users whom Twitter did clamp down on was Dr. Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School who tweeted in March 2021 that people “with prior natural infection do not need” the COVID-19 vaccine, “[n]or [do] children
Kulldorff’s tweet was flagged by the site as “misleading” — even though it was in line with the vaccine policies of “numerous other countries,” Zweig wrote
originally posted by: NormalGuyCrazyWorld
The glaring problem here is, there is zero accountability at the top; embracing corruption to spite your adversaries seems to be basic human nature. It's the same thing for cherry-picked "peer reviewed" information. (Consensus is NOT science.)
Bottom line - gather ye rosebuds, while ye may!
The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. -Richard Horton
When former President Donald Trump told his followers in October 2020 that he was “Feeling really good!” after undergoing COVID-19 treatment at Walter Reed Medical Center — and urged his supporters not to be afraid of the virus or let it “dominate your life,” former FBI general counsel turned Twitter honcho James Baker asked the company’s then-watchdog why the message wasn’t flagged.
“Why isn’t this POTUS tweet a violation of our COVID-19 policy? (Especially the ‘Don’t be afraid of Covid’ statement),” Baker, then Twitter’s deputy general counsel asked then-Head of Safety and Trust Yoel Roth and top legal executive Stacia Cardille.
Roth – who quit last month amid Elon Musk’s November takeover – replied to Baker that optimism was not misinformation.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Biden was the one fostering the most blatant lies supporting his unconstitutional mandate, and the biggest liar about the 'vaccines' and how great they were/are, even after it was proven they didn't lessen symptoms or stop infection, and then came the Twitter bans when people vocalized these things, so it is no surprise that Biden was behind it.
But all of this was quite obvious from the get go what was happening.