It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But understand this: In the last days terrible times will come. For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, without love of good, traitorous, reckless, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. Turn away from such as these!
2 Timothy 3:2-5
“The only thing the God of the Bible managed to create is organic beings. […] Now we try to go beyond the God of the Bible and create inorganic life, something He never managed to do[…]”
“Now we are much better than the God of the Bible. I mean in the Bible you have these recurring droughts.”
“History began when humans invented gods, and will end when humans become gods”
“We don’t have to wait until Christ’s second coming in order to overcome death. A couple of geeks in a laboratory can do it if you give them enough time and money.”
Yuval lectures on God, proclaiming that God has failed, without giving a nod to even the most rudimentary theological understanding of what God is trying to do. God wasn’t trying to make us immortal or have good crop yields or victory over His other children. God is trying to teach us. God is a potter, crafting a world.
Yuval Noah Harari Thinks God Has Failed
"Do not be deceived: God is not to be mocked. Whatever a man sows, he will reap in return.
Galatians 6: 7
I'm well aware of what Yuval has said about "useless eaters", which I'd probably be included among, according to his standards. But today, I'm going to be playing devil's advocate since this whole topic is overblown... as usual.
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
I will just add that Yuval Harari, of World Economic Forum infamy (Klaus Schwab fanboy), has made statements which imply that the World Economic Forum, and those like them, have openly declared war on those who profess a belief in God.
He is criticizing god (and by extensions, Christians) for inaction and negligence. He's not professing atheism, seeing as how he acknowledges what god ought to be doing and taking measures as god might've done. He's probably a modern deist (in the sense that god made the world and abandoned it). Hardly a case of presumptuousness, the priests are more guilty of professing to know the mind of god.
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
He has stated openly:
The only thing the God of the Bible managed to create is organic beings. […] Now we try to go beyond the God of the Bible and create inorganic life, something He never managed to do[…]”
“Now we are much better than the God of the Bible. I mean in the Bible you have these recurring droughts.”
“We don’t have to wait until Christ’s second coming in order to overcome death. A couple of geeks in a laboratory can do it if you give them enough time and money.”
Why should he acknowledge a theology which hardly understands what god is trying to do? If Christians knew what god is trying to do, they wouldn't be incessantly screaming that it's the end of the world. Every single year.
Yuval lectures on God, proclaiming that God has failed, without giving a nod to even the most rudimentary theological understanding of what God is trying to do.
But that's exactly what Christianity has taught for two thousand years: you can live forever, you don't have to improve yourself; the blessings of god are revealed in material success and prosperity; the greatness of Christian rulers lies in their earthly conquests.
God wasn’t trying to make us immortal or have good crop yields or victory over His other children.
What's the exact source?
Specifically about the need to 'de facto' eliminate the poor, for example.
This is another instance where the English language falls short in competing with foreign languages (i.e. German, Russian), which often have two or more similar terms with different meanings. The term "insane" doesn't factor in whether the madness is practical or accurate.
He is insane, the WEF is insane for going along with these ideas,