BitChute’s Bank Accounts Have Been Frozen And Suspended In Attempt To End Platform

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Exactly. Just like this 'gentleman' is supporting.

According to these radical left-wing ideas anyone who disagrees with the official narrative can loose their job, have their bank accounts closed, have their money withheld or even stolen, and even go to jail if he/she dares argue that a man cannot become a woman...

a reply to: nickyw

Spot on.

The sheeple have forgotten what rule of law, and legislation and human rights mean, and gone straight to demonisation and tribalism, backed up by 'mandates' which should be called 'dictates' but that's too old school isn't it?

This is the new world so we need new words lol

As usual people are confusing content with the morality of agreement.

Disagreeing with content is fine, go elsewhere. I find absolutely everything on TV mind control trash. All of it, especially local "news." And, I just don't watch it. I don't demand the products I use stop paying to advertise keeping the TV alive and well.

Targeted destruction, of which this Bitchute thing is, is terrorism. Since all the talking points are the same with regard to them, we can assume they are targeted by some DS goon deploying methhead antifa types to say things like "sh#$Tshoot" is trash.

Bitchute isn't forced upon anyone, the content, things like "The FBI is working with Twitter" "The CIA had hand in JFK's death" "there are issues with the jab" are pretty much demonstrated to be true. So, yesterdays trash is today's truth.

But that is not the point, as some folks think that if all content isn't perfect, then all content must be banned. Find the bad content, say it's all bad, then ban. Very KGB.

The point is, can a Bank hold money if no crime has been committed? Can a bank hold personal property that violates their own terms of service? Did the bank's terms agree to host them WITH moral provisions, or no? If the bank does not like X, it is free not to do business with X, sure, but does it then have the moral, not "legal" but moral right to hold hostage the "Money" in order to force behavioral change?

The bank is holding money to FORCE behavioral change. Folks like this of course, as they love taxes on themselves to change their habits, but is it moral? Smokers love taxes added to vape products, cigs and such to force them to alter their behavior.

If one argues in favor of this they are beyond ignorant, as they are arguing for this very thing to be applied to them tomorrow. If, HSBC, finds the ATS postings of said defender offensive, they may in fact withhold the money until offender changes their posting. Social Credit Scoring, folks are arguing in favor this by even arguing at all.

As to say Bitchute, or as the paid trolls say "sl$%Tshoot," is definitely a moral violation, and they as the moral arbiters are not, shows they fail to understand morality at all.

It is also worth noting that this is the case of the 21st century reality. Corps are large enough now that the Mission Statement is, "let'm sue us, we'll break them with endless filings, time wasters, and in the end if we have to settle we'll do it for pennies on the dollar."

It is those who fail to understand morality, bread out of them by the commie agenda, will become most controlled by this lack of remedy their own ignorance has created.

Here is my concern of Bitchute. Return the money, those who aren't interested, go to Youtube and only search for family friendly things, like Drag Queen story time, and Drag Queens for kids stuff and other once morally unacceptable things.

a reply to: crankyoldman

They have been trying hard to see if they can implement a social credit system.

You behave well and you post well? Then you have no problem.

Greatest form of fascism

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: crankyoldman

They have been trying hard to see if they can implement a social credit system.

You behave well and you post well? Then you have no problem.

Greatest form of fascism

Yes, but it isn't the government doing it. It is the crabs in the bucket who are doing it to themselves.

China's government does it to them, or the CCP, but in the US it is the neighbors, the hall monitors, the people so drunk with wokeism they scream at the slightest slight, rather than simply moving on with life.

They fail to see their actions invite the return to them someday, someday wokeism will hit the woke, and they will be canceled in the same way only they are mostly ignorant, poor and useful idiots and their fall while short, will be painful.

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
a reply to: crankyoldman

They have been trying hard to see if they can implement a social credit system.

You behave well and you post well? Then you have no problem.

Greatest form of fascism

Yes, but it isn't the government doing it. It is the crabs in the bucket who are doing it to themselves.

China's government does it to them, or the CCP, but in the US it is the neighbors, the hall monitors, the people so drunk with wokeism they scream at the slightest slight, rather than simply moving on with life.

They fail to see their actions invite the return to them someday, someday wokeism will hit the woke, and they will be canceled in the same way only they are mostly ignorant, poor and useful idiots and their fall while short, will be painful.

Yes indeed!! The woke agenda is everywhere. If you make the 'wrong' move the spies and informers will be on you try to persecute you and cancel you.

Speaking of China. It's not only the communist party. There are many of its people who follow it and others who comply so the 'right' ideas and behaviours are always be dominant in their society and everything is cancelled. Sometimes together with the people who dissent as they are cancelled physically and they cease to exist...

No system can survive if its people don't believe in it.

originally posted by: igloo
Regardless, they have no right to legally freeze up their money. If they don't want their business or to be associated, fine, but give back the money and let bitchute move on.

They may have the right to do it, it's probably on the small letters at the end of the contract.

One of the reasons is suspicion of illegal activities related to the account.

originally posted by: crankyoldman
The bank is holding money to FORCE behavioral change. Folks like this of course, as they love taxes on themselves to change their habits, but is it moral? Smokers love taxes added to vape products, cigs and such to force them to alter their behavior.

Did the bank say why is it holding the money?

originally posted by: ArMaP

originally posted by: igloo
Regardless, they have no right to legally freeze up their money. If they don't want their business or to be associated, fine, but give back the money and let bitchute move on.

They may have the right to do it, it's probably on the small letters at the end of the contract.

One of the reasons is suspicion of illegal activities related to the account.

They have no right to withhold or steal the money of any account.

No illegal activities are going on.

Only the State has the power to block accounts and froze assets.

originally posted by: ArMaP

originally posted by: crankyoldman
The bank is holding money to FORCE behavioral change. Folks like this of course, as they love taxes on themselves to change their habits, but is it moral? Smokers love taxes added to vape products, cigs and such to force them to alter their behavior.

Did the bank say why is it holding the money?

I will re-iterate what the other members said

The bank is holding money to FORCE behavioral change.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
They have no right to withhold or steal the money of any account.

Did you read the contract between the bank and BitChute?

No illegal activities are going on.

How can you know that?

Only the State has the power to block accounts and froze assets.

Wrong, it depends on the contract. In most cases, banks do have the right to freeze the accounts.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

The bank is holding money to FORCE behavioral change.

If not said by the bank it's irrelevant.

originally posted by: ArMaP

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
They have no right to withhold or steal the money of any account.

Did you read the contract between the bank and BitChute?

No illegal activities are going on.

How can you know that?

Only the State has the power to block accounts and froze assets.

Wrong, it depends on the contract. In most cases, banks do have the right to freeze the accounts.

There is nothing going on. They just wanted to silence free speech. The bank wanted to enforce the official narrative and change the behaviour of Bitchute.

There is no basis for withholding funds or for blocking Bitchute's account.

a reply to: Astyanax
Your point of view is sad to me. So sad that because of feelings, like the feelings that you have, that because of this kind of crap, we can’t have free speech?

originally posted by: Asmodeus3
There is no basis for withholding funds or for blocking Bitchute's account.

Sure, that happened. Send him money!

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
a reply to: Astyanax
Your point of view is sad to me. So sad that because of feelings, like the feelings that you have, that because of this kind of crap, we can’t have free speech?

This point aligns with the radical left-wing views and ideas that seek to censor and silence opposing views on the basis of disagreement with them.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Is that your opinion or do you have a statement from the bank saying it?

originally posted by: ArMaP
a reply to: Asmodeus3

Is that your opinion or do you have a statement from the bank saying it?

Which one?

a reply to: Asmodeus3

Let me guess...
Left-wing?

Dead wrong.

Let me guess: junior high?

a reply to: EmmanuelGoldstein

we can’t have free speech?

You can have all the free speech you want. But not on someone else's credit. Maybe go ask Elon for a loan, he seems to be fond of troll talk.