Massive negative eficacy with mrna vaccines.

Here are some peer-reviewed studies that show that over time the more doses you get the more likely you are to get covid.It is a wonder they let these out into the public domain. The fact is the more doses you have the more likely you are to get sick. As always the best-performing group is the one who didn't take any vaccines. So it is a negative vaccine, a medical intervention more likely to cause sickness.Who knows where the heck this is going? www.bitchute.com...

I've been hearing this over and over on talk radio. And its starting to get annoying but I guess it cant be repeated enough because obviously many folks out there have no idea the harm that coronavaxximg does them. I hear:

1. mRNA vaxxes are loaded with self replicating spike proteins that clog arteries. Morticians are reporting extremely prolific numbers of corpses filled with rubbery inorganic clots.

2. A process called shedding, not much different than perspiring, can spread these replicating spike proteins through the air.

3. Workers in all industries that were terminated due to refusing vaxxinations are being rehired and in many cases back-paid for their financial losses. Vaxxed folks with permanent health damage are being compensated financially as well, but with no cure and no known treatment for inorganic self replicating rubbery clots, their outlook is dim.

I hear these things repeated endlessly over most all media now.

What I dont understand is the conflicting message being sent by the US government. On one hand they are compensating and reinstating anti vaxxers while on the other hand they are still selling clotshots to anyone that will take them.

a reply to: SeriouslyDeep

After 30 years in the federal govt military and civil service that makes perfect sense.

Literally the right hand doesnt know what the left hand is doing, cant decide if this is by design or just to many paper pushers.

a reply to: Irishhaf

millions of people following a legal protocol, shame it's the wrong protocol, which can't be changed fast enough to adapt to the changed conditions.

originally posted by: SeriouslyDeep
I've been hearing this over and over on talk radio. And its starting to get annoying but I guess it cant be repeated enough because obviously many folks out there have no idea the harm that coronavaxximg does them. I hear:

1. mRNA vaxxes are loaded with self replicating spike proteins that clog arteries. Morticians are reporting extremely prolific numbers of corpses filled with rubbery inorganic clots.

The spike protein does not self-replicate.

The mRNA vaccines also do not contain the spike protein. They contain the mRNA coding for our bodies to use to create the spike protein.

The mRNA is short lived, generally breaking down in under 72 hours.

The spike protein is also destroyed by our immune system, once we begin to have a strong immune response against it (about 3-5 days).

Blood normally clots in the hours after death.

By definition, anything produced by the human body would be organic. More so clotted blood.

2. A process called shedding, not much different than perspiring, can spread these replicating spike proteins through the air.

Shedding is anything that takes a bacteria or virus back out of an infected host body. A cough, sneeze, or even heavy breathing, sheds virus particles out into the air. The coronavirus particles are coated in spike proteins. It is possible that isolated spike proteins could be shed, but they aren't infectious like the virus is. If someone breathed in the isolated spike protein, then it would trigger immune response, the same as vaccination does.

3. Workers in all industries that were terminated due to refusing vaxxinations are being rehired and in many cases back-paid for their financial losses.

There are a few instances, but the anti-vax crowd make a bigger thing out of it than it is.

Vaxxed folks with permanent health damage are being compensated financially as well, but with no cure and no known treatment for inorganic self replicating rubbery clots, their outlook is dim.

The problem is that it is almost impossible to make a legal case that the vaccines are the cause of possible adverse reactions, considering the billions of doses administered, and the few potential adverse reactions.

I hear these things repeated endlessly over most all media now.

... social media and astroturfing anti-vax sites.

The mainstream news carries few of these types of stories.

FYI


www.fluvaccinestudy.com... 65p_sny_video

originally posted by: anonentity
Here are some peer-reviewed studies that show that over time the more doses you get the more likely you are to get covid.It is a wonder they let these out into the public domain. The fact is the more doses you have the more likely you are to get sick. As always the best-performing group is the one who didn't take any vaccines. So it is a negative vaccine, a medical intervention more likely to cause sickness.Who knows where the heck this is going? www.bitchute.com...

Are we taking into account viral mutation, which would make existing vaccines less effective?

Much of our knowledge of how viruses change to escape natural or vaccine-elicited immunity comes from observing the influenza virus and constantly updating influenza vaccines. Influenza viruses change in two main ways, antigenic drift and antigenic shift.

A comparison of the similarities and differences between coronaviruses and flu viruses may help us understand how those similarities and differences could impact potential COVID-19 vaccines.

When a shift happens, most people have little or no immunity against the resulting new virus (as shown by the “x” marks below). Viruses emerging as a result of antigenic shift are the ones most likely to cause pandemics.

To date, we have seen coronaviruses act like influenza viruses in generating outbreaks and now a pandemic from processes of recombination and zoonosis generating novel human coronaviruses (resembling the antigenic shift and zoonotic origin of new human influenza virus subtypes).

Thus far, we have seen human coronaviruses mutate but not undergo antigenic drift. This is good news for coronavirus vaccines. Nevertheless, given the similarities between the behavior of influenza viruses and coronaviruses, there is ample reason to remain vigilant for the possibility of future antigenic changes in SARS-CoV-2 and to be prepared to alter a potential COVID-19 vaccine, if necessary.

www.pfizer.com...

originally posted by: SeriouslyDeep
What I dont understand is the conflicting message being sent by the US government. On one hand they are compensating and reinstating anti vaxxers while on the other hand they are still selling clotshots to anyone that will take them.

The US and other governments (even of enemy countries) are carrying a consistent message.

What is inconsistent and usually contradictory (alleging that it is benign cold, that is somehow at the same time deadly, or that it is the vaccine causing the deaths, when clearly the death toll was rising before the vaccines were available) is the nonsense peddled by the conspiracy believers.

Negative efficacy means it's working. (For its intended purpose).

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: anonentity
Here are some peer-reviewed studies that show that over time the more doses you get the more likely you are to get covid.It is a wonder they let these out into the public domain. The fact is the more doses you have the more likely you are to get sick. As always the best-performing group is the one who didn't take any vaccines. So it is a negative vaccine, a medical intervention more likely to cause sickness.Who knows where the heck this is going? www.bitchute.com...

Are we taking into account viral mutation, which would make existing vaccines less effective?

Much of our knowledge of how viruses change to escape natural or vaccine-elicited immunity comes from observing the influenza virus and constantly updating influenza vaccines. Influenza viruses change in two main ways, antigenic drift and antigenic shift.

A comparison of the similarities and differences between coronaviruses and flu viruses may help us understand how those similarities and differences could impact potential COVID-19 vaccines.

When a shift happens, most people have little or no immunity against the resulting new virus (as shown by the “x” marks below). Viruses emerging as a result of antigenic shift are the ones most likely to cause pandemics.

To date, we have seen coronaviruses act like influenza viruses in generating outbreaks and now a pandemic from processes of recombination and zoonosis generating novel human coronaviruses (resembling the antigenic shift and zoonotic origin of new human influenza virus subtypes).

Thus far, we have seen human coronaviruses mutate but not undergo antigenic drift. This is good news for coronavirus vaccines. Nevertheless, given the similarities between the behavior of influenza viruses and coronaviruses, there is ample reason to remain vigilant for the possibility of future antigenic changes in SARS-CoV-2 and to be prepared to alter a potential COVID-19 vaccine, if necessary.

www.pfizer.com...

I'm going to go to a conspiracy site and literally quote big pharma to debunk people. What other links, whitehouse.gov?

a reply to: anonentity

An increasing number of cases just shows the infectiousness of the disease and we know that recent strains are more infectious, and are likely to continue.

After the discovery of fire, the increasing numbers of cave-men using fire had little to do with the way they put the fire out.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: quintessentone

originally posted by: anonentity
Here are some peer-reviewed studies that show that over time the more doses you get the more likely you are to get covid.It is a wonder they let these out into the public domain. The fact is the more doses you have the more likely you are to get sick. As always the best-performing group is the one who didn't take any vaccines. So it is a negative vaccine, a medical intervention more likely to cause sickness.Who knows where the heck this is going? www.bitchute.com...

Are we taking into account viral mutation, which would make existing vaccines less effective?

Much of our knowledge of how viruses change to escape natural or vaccine-elicited immunity comes from observing the influenza virus and constantly updating influenza vaccines. Influenza viruses change in two main ways, antigenic drift and antigenic shift.

A comparison of the similarities and differences between coronaviruses and flu viruses may help us understand how those similarities and differences could impact potential COVID-19 vaccines.

When a shift happens, most people have little or no immunity against the resulting new virus (as shown by the “x” marks below). Viruses emerging as a result of antigenic shift are the ones most likely to cause pandemics.

To date, we have seen coronaviruses act like influenza viruses in generating outbreaks and now a pandemic from processes of recombination and zoonosis generating novel human coronaviruses (resembling the antigenic shift and zoonotic origin of new human influenza virus subtypes).

Thus far, we have seen human coronaviruses mutate but not undergo antigenic drift. This is good news for coronavirus vaccines. Nevertheless, given the similarities between the behavior of influenza viruses and coronaviruses, there is ample reason to remain vigilant for the possibility of future antigenic changes in SARS-CoV-2 and to be prepared to alter a potential COVID-19 vaccine, if necessary.

www.pfizer.com...

I'm going to go to a conspiracy site and literally quote big pharma to debunk people. What other links, whitehouse.gov?

The message will be the same as it's been for the influenza vaccine all along...and the flu vax always changes to keep up, so it will be with the Covid vax unless it veers off to where we may not be able to deal with it.

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: anonentity
An increasing number of cases just shows the infectiousness of the disease and we know that recent strains are more infectious, and are likely to continue.

yes more infectious for those pin cushions who have had 4+ doses, than it is for those pin cushions who have had 3 doses
yes more infectious for those pin cushions who have had 3 doses, than it is for those people who have had 2 doses
yes more infectious for those people who had 2 doses, than it is for those people who had 1 dose
yes more infectious for those people who had 1 dose, than the people who never received a dose of any of the ineffective covid 19 shots.

The vaccine depresses innate immune system which makes a person more susceptible to mucosal infection.