It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mirror
I have been reading a lot of posts that refure to him as a negative, ignorite person when it comes to secret societies...
What did he do or write that people do not seem to see him as credible??
again a very stupid question on my part, but I am just wondering?..
Originally posted by EricFM
Here's a link to the David Icke section of the site, if you haven't found it yet. Most people would agree things he say are wild, but it is worth reading.
Originally posted by Simulacra
www.DavidIcke.com
It's better to get the info from the source than hear people like senrak giving his ignorant response to a subject he knows nothing of.
Originally posted by senrak
Originally posted by Simulacra
www.DavidIcke.com
It's better to get the info from the source than hear people like senrak giving his ignorant response to a subject he knows nothing of.
So Simulacra,
I suppose you BELIEVE that there are reptilian aliens who "morph" in and out of human form?
Talk about ignorance.....sheesh!
Originally posted by akilles
Senrak would do well to even be AWARE of such phrases as:
Throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Or he could claim ignorance to the phrase, as he has claimed ignorance to reading anything about David Icke beyond the fact that he says there are aliens,
*dum dum dum*
Now senrak, does that idea bother you, or the way it has been presented?
Originally posted by Simulacra
The irony of your post is priceless.
Originally posted by akilles
Or he could claim ignorance to the phrase, as he has claimed ignorance to reading anything about David Icke beyond the fact that he says there are aliens, and *dum dum dum* they are among us.
Now senrak, does that idea bother you, or the way it has been presented?
...
Now then Icke covers ground many people are not comfortable with, he tries to tackle 'supernatural' events and what makes the 'Royals' of England so 'Royal' in the first place. All I can say is, read it all, and decide for yourself.
Originally posted by sebatwerk
I've seen it all for myself and I know that what this guy says is boloney. What the guy says is absolutely ridiculous and is not worth the time it takes to read it.
[edit on 7-4-2005 by sebatwerk]
Originally posted by Springer
Originally posted by sebatwerk
I've seen it all for myself and I know that what this guy says is boloney. What the guy says is absolutely ridiculous and is not worth the time it takes to read it.
[edit on 7-4-2005 by sebatwerk]
Now there's a statement i don't come across often, "I've seens it ALL for myself"...
The rest of your quote above I find of particular interest though... Does this mean you have ceased all research or only with respects to "far out" ideas?
I mean zero ill will here, it's just I can't recall ever seeing anyone say they've "seen it all" on a board such as ours in the 15 plus years I've been involved in forums like this.
I am officially intrigued for what it's worth...
While I give Icke no credence in most of his theories, I would hesitate to refuse reading ANYTHING based on the first few passages.
Originally posted by akilles
Criticize him for saying it without proof, but don't say the man's ideas must be useless because you don't like folk tales and myths being interpreted literally.