It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source: www.foxbusiness.com...
"Let me run Twitter for a bit," Fridman said. "No Salary. All in. Focus on great engineering and increasing the amount of love in the world. Just offering my help in the unlikely case it’s useful."
Shortly after Fridman made the offer, Musk responded.
"You must like a lot of pain," he said.
"One catch: you have to invest your life savings in Twitter...And it has been in the fast lane to bankruptcy since May.
Still want the job?"
originally posted by: carewemust
Sunday, December 18, 2022
Below is an excerpt from a conversation Elon Musk had with MIT research scientist and podcast host Lex Fridman, earlier this evening.
....
Is it possible Elon Musk didn't know Twitter was a huge money loser before he paid a staggering $44,000,000,000 ($44 BILLION) for the social media platform?
...
Maybe his purchase of Twitter was motivated by something else, other than to simply own and fix a social media company platform?
-CareWeMust
originally posted by: carewemust
Is it possible Elon Musk didn't know Twitter was a huge money loser before he paid a staggering $44,000,000,000 ($44 BILLION) for the social media platform?
Maybe his purchase of Twitter was motivated by something else, other than to simply own and fix a social media company platform?
originally posted by: starshift
I don't understand why he didn't just dump the shares he bought it in to it, after they got squirrely about selling it. He had the upper hand and had many opportunities to change his offer such as when the stories came out about the high amount of bots populating the site.
It's just odd that he stayed with his original offer despite the product looking more and more damaged as the transition progressed.
originally posted by: hangedman13
Makes a person wonder if the government involvement was to keep it from tanking. It sure operated like it was run by the government with all the waste and underperforming employees. Plus as a tool for societal manipulation it performed admirably, incentive for the government to keep it running. But Musk ruined that!
originally posted by: igloo
a reply to: hangedman13
Maybe ruining it for the left/government is it's own reward for him.
I can see the appeal, still it's a lot of money to throw at a losing venture.
originally posted by: markovian
Everyone said Tesla will fail
Everyone said SpaceX was impossible
Now everyone says Twitter will fail
My bet is it will not fail
Musk can afford to lose $44B. It's not like he had been lugging it around in his backpack.