Definitive 9.11 Pentagon EVIDENCE.

This is one analysis I done of the gate video. I did not account for the fish eye distortion, good to see you have some images that have. Do you know how that process was done?



Here are a few other photos of events at the Pentagon on 9/11 to help try make some sense of it:

In regards to this frame, do you have a source for it?



In digging through 9/11, these scene has been photo shopped a lot of times with many different variations out there, some more clearly faked than others. Part of the reason for this is the psychological war against the population to keep the facts hidden, blurred and in doubt. As one more reputable source on this issue from the Judicial Watch Youtube account:

ORIGINAL September 11 Pentagon Video -- 1 of 2


Judicial Watch September 11 Pentagon Video -- 2 of 2

This animated gif file was put together from the video in the Judicial Watch source.

As one suspect for what this object is:



With whatever hit the Pentagon, the hole it left was not big enough to put an airplane the size in the official story. The bright while light on impact is what missiles do. There was none of this bright white light as the planes hit WTC 1 & 2.

Calm down, relax and read a few times my 11 pages, full of answers about what you asked for, in your above posts.

And, really take the time to read a few times David Chandler’s page, where he explains how the GIMP software he bought in 2015, assists you and him, in straightening out all the bended roof and pavement lines, in the 2 original 9/11 DoD security gate videos, that were recorded in 2001 with those very bulbous fish-eye lenses.
And only then, the real dimensions are measurable of AA77 and the Pentagon’s West wall’s height at the point of impact.

All links are in my now 12 pages, no need to repeat them endlessly.
And after you have realized at last, that this Pentagon plane evidence I gave you all, proves that all those cut light poles in their false 45 degrees trajectory, were just the usual distractions from a USA government and its gladly assisting Military. Which they can not ever retract anymore.!

Do not fall for the endless photoshopped pictures of a millions of dollars funded US distractions department.
It was no Tomahawk that you posted, that impacted the Pentagon, it was a 155 ft long Flight AA77 Boeing.

originally posted by: kwakakev
In regards to this frame, do you have a source for it?

In digging through 9/11, these scene has been photo shopped a lot of times with many different variations out there, some more clearly faked than others. Part of the reason for this is the psychological war against the population to keep the facts hidden, blurred and in doubt. As one more reputable source on this issue from the Judicial Watch Youtube account:

ORIGINAL September 11 Pentagon Video -- 1 of 2

Judicial Watch September 11 Pentagon Video -- 2 of 2

You fall for any lie that strokes your biases and undiscerning ego.

originally posted by: kwakakev
As one suspect for what this object is:

With whatever hit the Pentagon, the hole it left was not big enough to put an airplane the size in the official story. The bright while light on impact is what missiles do. There was none of this bright white light as the planes hit WTC 1 & 2.

What?

Damage to the Pentagon

Section Summary: It is a common misunderstanding that AAL77 left only a "small hole" in the Pentagon facade, that it punched through 6 reinforced walls, and left a slightly smaller hole in the C-Ring wall. This is a totally false assertion. For a complete composite of the facade damage, click and enlarge the first two images below. There and in the following section you will find extensive wide spread damage from the fuselage, engines, wings, even the vertical stabilizer.

Further down take note of the construction of the Pentagon. Only the outer wall was constructed with reinforcing. The C-Ring "punch out" wall was plain brick and nothing more. Also note that the area AAL77 impacted; the bottom and second floors, is open space the entire distance between the outer E-Ring and the inner C-Ring with no dividing walls lower than the third floor. It can therefore clearly be seen that AAL77 did not penetrate 6 reinforced walls, but only 1; the outer most wall.

therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.com...

Most people find no credibility in the 9/11 truth movement because it was based on blatant lies. By people pushing a product for fame and or fortune.

a reply to: kwakakev

You mean stuff like this?

Blink Comparator Views of
the Plane at the Pentagon

By David Chandler, based on prior work by Ken Jenkins

911speakout.org...


Note that when barrel distortion is eliminated, the image compression near the edge of the field is eliminated, so the plane appears longer, with proportions resembling a 757. (Remember, the plane is also moving toward us at about a 45 degree angle.)

One feature of the plane image helps us identify it as an American Airlines plane. Note the purple stripe along the side of the plane. American Airlines planes have parallel red and blue stripes. At the small scale of the original image it is quite likely that this purple stripe is a merger of the color information from a red and a blue stripe.

originally posted by: kwakakev
As one suspect for what this object is:

With whatever hit the Pentagon, the hole it left was not big enough to put an airplane the size in the official story. The bright while light on impact is what missiles do. There was none of this bright white light as the planes hit WTC 1 & 2.

You know that is a fake imagine….

a reply to: WhatItIs

By David Chandler, based on prior work by Ken Jenkins

911speakout.org...

I tried that link. A lot of the sources are dead links. Even tried the wayback machine and not playing nice. So where is the source for these images you place your belief on? Did see a couple of FOIA documents, not the source video that was released. If you have a better source than Judicial Watch I will have a look.

You fall for any lie that strokes your biases and undiscerning ego.

Well I guess I have fallen for you. Got any factual argument on any piece presented or just another all round lies as you retreat back to your debunker.

a reply to: LaBTop

Calm down, relax and read a few times my 11 pages, full of answers about what you asked for, in your above posts.

I checked out the first few pages of this thread before commenting. When I can see you started off on shaky foundations I been through enough to go too deep into it. Thanks for the tip on David Chandler and GIMP, I will have a look, he has done a lot of good work.

originally posted by: kwakakev


I tried that link. A lot of the sources are dead links. Even tried the wayback machine and not playing nice.

Link worked for me…


911speakout.org...

a reply to: WhatItIs

Link worked for me…

That link does, where does 911datasets.com and 911encylpodia.com go? The FOIA request has some documents, no video. Where did these images come from that David Chandler is working on? Garbage In, Garbage Out.

originally posted by: kwakakev
a reply to: WhatItIs

Link worked for me…

That link does, where does 911datasets.com and 911encylpodia.com go? The FOIA request has some documents, no video. Where did these images come from that David Chandler is working on? Garbage In, Garbage Out.

Probably didn’t make payments or lost the interest to keep the domain names going on whatever server. Or didn’t make repairs as coding or hardware became broken or obsolete. All from declining interest. Or loss of foot traffic as people figured out the blatant lies of the truth movement. And have moved on.

IS there a TL;DR on this thread thus far pleaseeee????

a reply to: WhatItIs

I don't know? Maybe? When seeing the psychological war still continue over things like covid, then hearing the DoD involvement. In some ways I am surprised it took this long for the next round.

I know it sucks bad seeing good source fall away. Lot of motives in this information war going on. I was late to the 9/11 game turning up in 2008. Sure there a lot of other gems that have fallen by the wayside. Still found a lot then that are dead links now.

As for how disclosure progresses into the future, something like the JFK files is what to expect. Little bits here and there. The lone gun man theory died a long time ago. Some might still hold onto it for nostalgia, as for a realistic approach to what really happened, that died a long time ago.

As for my take today, Lindon Johnston got orders from then UN. He signed off on it the night before with many others upset with the direction JFK was going. With 9/11 Bush Jr got orders from Bush Snr. The Zionist involved with Israel and the Neo Conservatives involved with bombs both won big that day.

a reply to: combatmaster

IS there a TL;DR on this thread

Ugg? What language are you speaking?

a reply to: kwakakev

Can anyone summarize this thread? is there a cohesive structure to the topic or all just wish wash??

a reply to: combatmaster

is there a cohesive structure to the topic or all just wish wash??

Is there anything with 9/11 that makes sense? As for this thread I can see people trying. Either help them out or just leave them alone.

originally posted by: combatmaster
a reply to: kwakakev

Can anyone summarize this thread? is there a cohesive structure to the topic or all just wish wash??

Typical truth movement of trying to post debunked claims where evidence is presented it’s debunked, so the typical truth movement strategy of moving goal posts, changing the subject, and whataboutism…

Same tactics pursued by Flat Earther’s. Oddly enough?

Example.

Me. The way the sun illuminates the bottom of clouds at sunrise proves spherical earth. Flat Earther, NASA lies.

Me. The entrance hole made in the pentagon is large enough to be made by a Boeing 757. The truth movement often pushes the smallest and last exit hole by flight 77 through the rings of the Pentagon as the entrance hole. Truth movement, the official narrative is a lie. Deep thought, what the hell does the truth movement offer….