German nurse avoids jail after injecting thousands with saltwater shot instead COVID vaccine

Any reports of excessive high blood pressure ? 🤣🤣

originally posted by: M5xaz

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: M5xaz
a reply to: Asmodeus3

She deserves a medal for saving the lives of thousands

The issue with this statement is that they will try to stick to the narrative that vaccines are safe and effective and have saved many lives.

Which is BS.

Dr Birx and the CDC have admitted that the covid "vaccine" does not prevent transmission or infection, unlike a real vaccine.

It supposedly prevents severe illness, but then hospitals are still operating at overcapacity in ICU while the near totality of patients are covid "vaccinated" .
THEREFORE THE "COVID VACCINE" DOES NOT WORK !!!
Only overinflated medical egos are preventing them climbing down from their soapbox and admitting they f*cked up

Finally, the covid "vaccines" are causing severe clotting, myocarditis and early deaths in many groups that are never very affected by covid, such as young men.

Fauci and his related ilk need to be tried for genocide= they killed more people than the Holocaust, bad as it was, ever did.

They don't need to admit it by the way. It was already known long before their admissions.

This is an RNA virus which is rapidly mutating. Vaccines cannot prevent transmission and infection and cannot significantly reduce them.

The bar has been moved to preventing serious illness and deaths. However this can be challenged too if one has the data.

What cannot be debated easily is the fact that these are untested products for which we know nothing much other than their short term unpleasant effects and serious illnesses they cause. Nobody knows the medium and long term effects and the benefit to risk ratio for all age groups.

Hence they are not safe and effective as to prove safety and effectiveness by definition you need to know everything mentioned above.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

I am disappointed she avoided jail. What she did was a betrayal of trust. Personal beliefs should not come in to it. The fact is she deceptively injected people with saline when they thought they were getting a vaccine. She is not a hero. I hope she never gets her license back.

One day she might be known as "Saint Antje."

originally posted by: TWS1969
Or did they just get caught using saline "placebo" shots mixed in with actual "vax" and needed a scapegoat?

london.ctvnews.ca...

www.abc.net.au...

lfpress.com...

www.wtvr.com...

And they have given "placebo" shots www.bidmc.org...

I want to comment on the last link you provided about those who experienced adverse reactions by taking the placebo.

When taking the placebo due to stress and anxiety or other psychological reasons you may have headaches, fatigue, or elevated heart rate due to stress.

However there is no way you will get autoimmune disorders, myocarditis, pericarditis, heart failure, allergic reactions, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia, and many other.

originally posted by: MetalChickAmy
a reply to: Asmodeus3

I am disappointed she avoided jail. What she did was a betrayal of trust. Personal beliefs should not come in to it. The fact is she deceptively injected people with saline when they thought they were getting a vaccine. She is not a hero. I hope she never gets her license back.

My take is that she wasn't jailed as there is plenty of doubt about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines which is widespread among all parts of society.

a reply to: The GUT
or perhaps the next "Schindler" type movie?

a reply to: M5xaz

It doesn't matter the tech used to achieve immunity, you can still catch and transmit most viral infections.
your immune system is just trained already, so you symptoms are less intense, the incubation, peak and healing is happening much faster.

Less coughing, less sneezing and less time contagious, are the factors that make you less contagious if you have gone trough immunisation, which can happen naturally too. But that's about all they do.

That said, the new mrna tech is diffrent in how it makes your body achieve immunity.

Dr Birx and the CDC have admitted that the covid "vaccine" does not prevent transmission or infection, unlike a real vaccine.

So, they basically keep telling the same lie, because real vaccines don't do that either.

a reply to: xosephx
I know that my doctor shot up around 5000 people and he has three nurses. That's how many patients he serves I guess because on the rural side of the country, even in places like Germany, there are not that many doctors. But I know he helped out in a vaccine center administering shots, but I could easy believe he has 5000k patients because on the country not every town of 2-3k people has their own doctor.

originally posted by: MetalChickAmy
a reply to: Asmodeus3

I am disappointed she avoided jail. What she did was a betrayal of trust. Personal beliefs should not come in to it. The fact is she deceptively injected people with saline when they thought they were getting a vaccine. She is not a hero. I hope she never gets her license back.

So, if you weren't armchair nursing and were an actual nurse like her and saw adverse reactions to a new drug with lets admit it, a laundry list of side effects, you would just keep injecting people because you were told to?
The medical industry is at fault here for threatening her livelihood/career unless injecting people with experimental, untested and known to be dangerous "drugs"

yikes

posting error deleted

a reply to: Asmodeus3

This woman is an Angel sent down from Heaven .

We do not deserve her but thank God for her.

a reply to: TheLieWeLive

I thinks it is possible no one wanted to push this further because what evidence it would uncover. If no one died because of her administering the saline/placebo, and no one later died from Covid after the placebo, then that would undermine that the vaccine even has an any affect against Covid.

Exactly

a reply to: Asmodeus3

...found guilty in a German court of six counts of intentional assault...

I'm curious about the assault charge. She didn't jab them without their consent. She didn't inject a toxic or dangerous substance. I would think the charge would be fraud for knowingly and willfully denying the patients the product they were seeking and (presumably) wanting.

I can neither praise nor fault the nurse. She was put in an impossible situation by others, thru no fault of her own. If she considered the vax too risky and her conscience did not allow her to be part of it, then she should have the right to decline being part of it. I doubt she had that choice. So she did what she could under the circumstances.

On the other hand, people do have the right to say "yes" for themselves, no matter how risky or misguided. And of course their decision should be fully informed with the whole truth as known and understood.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Asmodeus3

...found guilty in a German court of six counts of intentional assault...

I'm curious about the assault charge. She didn't jab them without their consent. She didn't inject a toxic or dangerous substance. I would think the charge would be fraud for knowingly and willfully denying the patients the product they were seeking and (presumably) wanting.

I can neither praise nor fault the nurse. She was put in an impossible situation by others, thru no fault of her own. If she considered the vax too risky and her conscience did not allow her to be part of it, then she should have the right to decline being part of it. I doubt she had that choice. So she did what she could under the circumstances.

On the other hand, people do have the right to say "yes" for themselves, no matter how risky or misguided. And of course their decision should be fully informed with the whole truth as known and understood.

Yes that's true when you are put in an impossible position. Although I would have done things differently as I said to my opening page.

I would have contacted the head nurse or manager and asked them not to be part of the vaccine campaign due to serious concerns I have in relation to the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines backing up my claims one by one in a written statement and probably having consulted a lawyer so to articulate it well.

a reply to: Terpene


If viruses can't mutate easily then there is a good chance you will get sterilising immunity either from an infection or a vaccine.

The mRNA vaccines can only give you partial immunity as they concentrate on the spike protein. But that's not the same as sterilising immunity. They can't prevent transmission and infection and in theory protection is against serious disease and death (an upgraded argument at this time)

She should have been struck off for her actions (as she was) and face prosecution (as she did), it was her job to give people a vaccination they chose to have, she was in a positon of trust.
If this truely was a moral decission she made, and felt that the vaccine didn't work then she should have refused to inject people and quit her job if it came to it, but she was happy to still collect a pay check so she should have been tried for fraud too.

originally posted by: Kurokage
She should have been struck off for her actions (as she was) and face prosecution (as she did), it was her job to give people a vaccination they chose to have, she was in a positon of trust.
If this truely was a moral decission she made, and felt that the vaccine didn't work then she should have refused to inject people and quit her job if it came to it, but she was happy to still collect a pay check so she should have been tried for fraud too.

The court disagreed with you... unfortunately.

For the record I have already said that if I was her:

I would have contacted the head nurse or manager and asked them not to be part of the vaccine campaign due to serious concerns I have in relation to the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines backing up my claims one by one in a written statement and probably having consulted a lawyer so to articulate it well.

But there is no need for someone to resign if they don't want to be part of a vaccine campaign. They can perform their duties as normal and been except from the vaccination campaign.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

I was just gaving my opinion on what she should have been prosecuted for, she was paid to give people a covid injection which they didn't recieve, thats fraud..

But there is no need for someone to resign if they don't want to be part of a vaccine campaign. They can perform their duties as normal and been except from the vaccination campaign.

Like I said, she could have refused to give the injection on moral grounds and if it came to it, resigned but she didn't. Instead she commited a criminal and fraudulent act.

originally posted by: Kurokage
a reply to: Asmodeus3

I was just gaving my opinion on what she should have been prosecuted for, she was paid to give people a covid injection which they didn't recieve, thats fraud..

But there is no need for someone to resign if they don't want to be part of a vaccine campaign. They can perform their duties as normal and been except from the vaccination campaign.

Like I said, she could have refused to give the injection on moral grounds and if it came to it, resigned but she didn't. Instead she commited a criminal and fraudulent act.

No need to resign though.
Why resign? A dedicated nurse can continue to perform her duties and be excempt from the vaccination campaign. It's totally plausible.

The judges recognised she didn't mean harm and there seems to be other doubts that the judges may have. It seems to me that the judges think there are merits in relation to the concerns raised by the nurse and obviously others. They probably think too that the mRNA vaccines are not safe and effective.

'Anti-vaxxer' nurses, hospital staff, and.....judges!