It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TamtammyMacx
This could all be a smokescrean. Forcing people to believe that they used social platforms to sway voters. Maybe the true reality is the intelligence agencies chose the winners because they own the voting system.
originally posted by: musicismagic
I believe the voting machines got him into the Oval Office, not the news media.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
originally posted by: musicismagic
I believe the voting machines got him into the Oval Office, not the news media.
Unfortunately a lot of Americans still watch CNN, MSNBC, and all the lying mainstream media. Even Fox News is full of rabid anti-Trump sycophants who want and support RINOs instead of actual Republicans to represent them.
Source: gettr.com...
“WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE FBI & ‘JUSTICE’ DEPARTMENT?” Trump wrote in all-caps.
“THEY SEEM TO BE TOTALLY OUT OF CONTROL!
THERE IS, RIGHT NOW, A ‘WEAPONIZATION’ OF JUSTICE THE LIKES OF WHICH OUR COUNTRY HAS NEVER SEEN BEFORE.
THE TWITTER AND FACEBOOK SCANDAL HAS ALREADY PROVEN TO BE, WITH THE POSSIBLE EXCEPTION OF SPYING ON MY CAMPAIGN, THEIR MOST SINISTER ACT IN HISTORY.”
originally posted by: Irishhaf
So if silicon valley was all in on this, (wouldnt surprise me a bit) how hard would it be for the tech giants to manipulate dominion voting machines?
That has to be the next question we ask.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Irishhaf
So if silicon valley was all in on this, (wouldnt surprise me a bit) how hard would it be for the tech giants to manipulate dominion voting machines?
That has to be the next question we ask.
IP addresses interacting with Arizona Dominion machines on 11.3.2020 were traced back to China. But a specific address was not traceable.
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Irishhaf
So if silicon valley was all in on this, (wouldnt surprise me a bit) how hard would it be for the tech giants to manipulate dominion voting machines?
That has to be the next question we ask.
IP addresses interacting with Arizona Dominion machines on 11.3.2020 were traced back to China. But a specific address was not traceable.
You can back this up right?
Specifically you say ip addresses were interacting with China but a specific ip address was not traceabale.
Can you explain how that works? Is that a layer 2 , layer 3 or layer 8 type of tracing that determined they were contacting China?
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Irishhaf
So if silicon valley was all in on this, (wouldnt surprise me a bit) how hard would it be for the tech giants to manipulate dominion voting machines?
That has to be the next question we ask.
IP addresses interacting with Arizona Dominion machines on 11.3.2020 were traced back to China. But a specific address was not traceable.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: carewemust
Time to start whittling the stubs off the sticks 😎
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: opethPA
Since supposedly silicon valley has some of the best techie types in the Nation would it really be that hard?
Also something to consider the people that handle voting machines have no clue how they are set up, so 100% of trust has to be given that Dominion set it up correctly, then 100% trust has to be given that the people that handled coting location setup didnt try to "adjust" anything.
Most people wouldnt have a clue on how to turn off wifi on a machine, it astonishs me on a regular basis that we put so much trust in people that are often technologically inept to handle computerized vote counting.
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: opethPA
Since supposedly silicon valley has some of the best techie types in the Nation would it really be that hard?
Also something to consider the people that handle voting machines have no clue how they are set up, so 100% of trust has to be given that Dominion set it up correctly, then 100% trust has to be given that the people that handled coting location setup didnt try to "adjust" anything.
Most people wouldnt have a clue on how to turn off wifi on a machine, it astonishs me on a regular basis that we put so much trust in people that are often technologically inept to handle computerized vote counting.
Okay great not saying anything you said is right or wrong.
That still isnt proof just like CWM doesnt seem to have proof for something he wrote about in a factual manner.
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: opethPA
Since supposedly silicon valley has some of the best techie types in the Nation would it really be that hard?
Also something to consider the people that handle voting machines have no clue how they are set up, so 100% of trust has to be given that Dominion set it up correctly, then 100% trust has to be given that the people that handled coting location setup didnt try to "adjust" anything.
Most people wouldnt have a clue on how to turn off wifi on a machine, it astonishs me on a regular basis that we put so much trust in people that are often technologically inept to handle computerized vote counting.
Okay great not saying anything you said is right or wrong.
That still isnt proof just like CWM doesnt seem to have proof for something he wrote about in a factual manner.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: opethPA
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: opethPA
Since supposedly silicon valley has some of the best techie types in the Nation would it really be that hard?
Also something to consider the people that handle voting machines have no clue how they are set up, so 100% of trust has to be given that Dominion set it up correctly, then 100% trust has to be given that the people that handled coting location setup didnt try to "adjust" anything.
Most people wouldnt have a clue on how to turn off wifi on a machine, it astonishs me on a regular basis that we put so much trust in people that are often technologically inept to handle computerized vote counting.
Okay great not saying anything you said is right or wrong.
That still isnt proof just like CWM doesnt seem to have proof for something he wrote about in a factual manner.
Since we're a conspiracy site, and not a news bureau, it's OK for any of us to relate something we've read, heard, or experienced, without "backing it up" with proof that most readers would accept.
Don't be so hard on yourself.