Dear Nuts

if you want to improve the social status of 'Conspiracy Theorist' we need to stop picking random groups as 'the enemy'.
The only solution to too much power in very few hands, has to be a little power in a lot of hands.
Democracy is not a dirty word.
Socialism is not a bad thing.
Rights and liberties are not bad things.

But they can be abused.
The're only as good as the people working on it.
Which is the point: we need to focus on what changes we want to implement, the issues at hands.
Picking people, in good as in bad, idolising them or condemning them is the wrong approach.
The relative wealth allows us to muse and play.
That's not a bad thing.
But two wrong turns and you end up in the woods.
Confused, lost, not even a flashlight...

It's all diversion and agitation.
Media, politics, news, podcasts, vids, ... nothing that doesn't come from the point of view of the people presenting it to you.
That's just in the nature of things.
And there's nothing wrong with disagreeing, because we all don't really know what the truth is.
But I think we agree, there's something incredible fishy.
Personally I feel we should start questioning what is actually happening? Not immediately 'who's fault is it?'

Think about it.
🌺
Your Fellow Nut

On another note libs are having issues.

Hive Social, a social media platform that has seen meteoric growth since Elon Musk took over Twitter, abruptly shut down its service on Wednesday after a security advisory warned the site was riddled with vulnerabilities that exposed all data stored in user accounts.

OOps

a reply to: Peeple

Exactly! well said

What is happening?
What is true and what is false


There is to much arguing and blaming, and to much disinfo, even in conspiracy corners.
We should stand as one against whatever is wrong, not bash each others heads in because we disagree

a reply to: KindraLabelle2

It would be nice if we had some sort of computer program that we could run to tell us if the information was actually true or not. But, could we really trust the manufacturer of such a piece of technology, not to be one of the bad guys? I know, you will say that we already have something like this, through google, but can we actually even trust the information that we are getting from it. The only way we could actually be sure of anything is if we were to witness it first- hand. That would be even better than having a piece of software that will tell us if someone is lying. Honestly, living on this planet can be such a challenge sometimes.

a reply to: KindraLabelle2

We should stand as one against whatever is wrong, not bash each others heads in because we disagree

The disagreements come from not being able to agree on what is wrong and how best to fix it.

It's a vicious, never-ending circle.

a reply to: Peeple

The left made enemies out of everyday people who just want to work 40 hours a week and go to church on Sunday.
They treat us like we’re worse than the Taliban.
I don’t know what you can reasonably expect.

a reply to: KindraLabelle2

Kindra,

I DISAGREE !!

Just kidding.

Cheers

a reply to: Notabot12345666

To rise above. Meet them with the understanding that they suffer from aflictions you don't have.
I bet you got your own.
Everybody does.

So gently demand that public spaces are kept free from sex. I'm not iinterestedin other people's sexuality is because I'm not interested in doing them.

Society idealy is asexual, a community where you find a place that allows your contribution to improve the conditions for you and your 'tribe' to do well.
What you do behind closed doors is your business. But doing it for other reasons than bonding, ie forming a bigger unit, it becomes difficult.
Those are moral values, but I think I would stand up for a concept like that.

a reply to: Peeple
For freedom, socialism is a bad thing.
If you want to donate labor or money to a cause, feel free to donate all of your hard earned money and belongings to that cause.
When you force others to do it through government entities, freedom dies.

a reply to: Peeple

No. Just no.

You give an inch, they take a mile. They don't ask for anything, the Demand that others see things the way they do and if you don't, you're labeled with the worst they can think of.

If you are at the end of your rope, they demand you let go so they can have that few extra inches.
There is no more meeting in the middle, because they won't allow there to be a middle. It's either their way or you're a homophobic transphobic deplorable racist White Supremacist.

If you're not all in on drag queen story time for kindergarten, YOU are the problem, not them.
If you're not for letting a 5 year old take hormone blockers, wear a dress and have his penis cut off because the parent decides the kid is trans, then YOU are the problem, not their sick idea of normal.

No. No more "meeting in the middle".

a reply to: DAVID64

Honest question: does anyone think we would be talking about hormone blockers for children before gay marriage was legalized? Funny how far they can stretch that inch.

a reply to: Notabot12345666

You're right, they have stretched that inch....and that's the problem. I have no problem with people who are gay. You can't help who you're attracted to.

But there is NOTHING "normal" about a parent deciding the kid is trans when they're 5. Hell, a little kid will play with any toy available, but some parents see a kid pick up a doll and suddenly they are a girl. A little girl plays with a truck? Must be a boy, let's get started on those shots.

a reply to: DAVID64

I wasn't talking about middle ground. I was saying: your sex life is private and has no place in public spaces.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Notabot12345666

To rise above. Meet them with the understanding that they suffer from aflictions you don't have.

That’s a big ask to someone who lost a parent to a car crash and was denied a funeral visitation because of leftist ideology.
I just need to man up. Rise above.

It’s really easy to want to turn the other cheek when you’ve already gotten 10 free licks in.

Thing about Dear Nuts is they're cheaper than beer nuts, being they're still under a buck and all. I guess Im just here for the 'agitation' part of Your conclusion. Fun read, and great opportunity for a bunch of twisted thought.

a reply to: Peeple

I agree, so with that, you may want to look at just who is pushing all this into public spaces and trying to convince everyone it's perfectly normal.

a reply to: Peeple

Never going to happen.
They don’t want it to be private.

They don’t want anything sane or decent.
I am not giving one more inch. Ever.

a reply to: Peeple

The greater issue isn't sides ...but that we are ARGUING.

We have to somehow respect both sides, quit arguing to come together, respectful of each.


But it's soooo far from man "getting along".

I'll also say...Mudpit or Swamp. Both are pits, both have dirt....and the smart ones, climb up and out to wash off the dirt to see clearly.

See?

Peace

a reply to: DAVID64

Agree %100. I don’t care what adults do with other adults. When I was in kindergarten, I wished I was a girl because girls had long hair. By first grade I understood guys could have long hair too.
I grew into a normal straight guy who liked to have long hair ( before I lost it)
If the left had their way I never would’ve made it to puberty.

If we kill the left it will be allright!

When you're blind as a bat you should probably listen...

Joking aside, the only thing I really know is me. Everything else really could be a simulation.

That means I'm the cause of it all!
I don't believe that though since I actually listen to people occasionally, I notice some do internalise information and come up with unique answers that the media pundits never inspire.

I love seeing individuals in the matrix of conformity. They tend to be a lot less impressionable, there's nothing better than an honest person in my book. These people know they're lost and are much more perceptive because of it. They know about as much as me which is absolutely nothing, definitely worth listening to.

They see the dodos that fly in circles, meatballs anyone?