It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON, Dec 1 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Thursday dealt a blow to Donald Trump, reversing a judge's appointment of an independent arbiter to vet documents seized by the FBI from his Florida home and allowing all of the records to be used in a criminal investigation of the former president.
The Atlanta-based 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Justice Department in its challenge to Florida-based U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon's September decision to name a "special master" to review the records to decide if some should be kept from investigators.
The three-judge 11th Circuit panel said Cannon lacked the authority to grant Trump's request for a special master made in a lawsuit he filed two weeks after FBI agents carried out a court-approved Aug. 8 search at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach. It also overturned Cannon's decision to bar investigators from accessing most of the records pending the review and threw out Trump's suit.
...Trump faces a federal criminal investigation into his retention of sensitive government records after leaving office in January 2021, including whether he violated a 1917 law called the Espionage Act that makes it a crime to release information harmful to national security. Investigators also are looking into potential unlawful obstruction of the probe.
...FBI agents seized about 11,000 records, including about 100 marked as classified, during the search.
The 11th Circuit said that while a search warrant for a former president's property is "extraordinary," it did not give "the judiciary license to interfere in an ongoing investigation." The court also said Trump did not prove there was a "callous disregard" for his constitutional rights in the search of his property, one of the few reasons a court can intervene in an ongoing investigation.
Trump is likely to appeal the 11th Circuit's action to the conservative-majority U.S. Supreme Court. The 11th Circuit said its order will not take effect for seven days, during which Trump could seek to challenge it.
A Trump spokesperson called the decision "purely procedural and based only on jurisdiction," and said it did not address the merits of the case.
"President Donald J. Trump will continue to fight against the weaponized Department of 'Justice,' while standing for America and Americans," the spokesperson added.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: peaceinoutz
I don't even know if Thomas would provide a dissenting opinion. When Trump tried to overturn the 11th Circuit's order allowing the DOJ access to the classified documents the Justices unanimously decided not to hear the case.
Trump's current arguments aren't really any different than the ones the made then.
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: peaceinoutz
a reply to: RazorV66
Trump made his own bed.
POST REMOVED BY STAFF
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: peaceinoutz
It wouldn't really delay it though. The SCOTUS aren't likely to order an injunction that would prevent the DOJ from accessing documents until they Conference on the case.
originally posted by: litterbaux
a reply to: peaceinoutz
I thought it was already determined there wasn't anything out of the ordinary in these files?
It's hard to keep up with all the BS these days. Maybe I'm thinking of another story in the "Days of our lives" episode.
originally posted by: litterbaux
a reply to: RazorV66
Every new thing to get Trump just leads me to believe what he stands for is everything they don't want. MAGA (Make America Great Again) is now something that you attack people over? I mean how partisan are some of these people? If Joe Biden came out and said make America great again I'd be all for it, why does it matter who says it?
I think the reason 75" TV's are $500 bucks now is because the brainwashing tool, that it is, works, really really well.
I never thought in my life that people would think "making America great again" could be construed in a negative manner.