B20 calls on the G20 to adopt vaccine passports using WHO standards

pretty much a non starter and would only usher in civil conflicts the question is why would businesses want civil conflicts to pauperise themselves into non existence..

a reply to: Maxmars

the thing is these people have read/watched to much Hollywood and cant see any downsides or unintended consequences to theiracions as its always a happ ending for them as they get everything they want..

the thing is most countries/cultures exist despite these kinds of people not because of them.. they've outlived worse and they'll outlive these..

originally posted by: RAY1990
a reply to: MykeNukem

We'd all probably agree a lot more if everyone was better informed!

We probably agree that we can't just throw away the old systems either. Who's going to stop the hypothetical millionaire who's on a world tour of brothels that happens to be HIV positive?

No, no, you're right, I was just clarifying my stance.

Same I find big brother to be a poor fatherly figure, it has nothing to do with where we go or keeping us safe.

Yessir. Agreed.

BUT they'll just bring the "healthy" hookers to his room, lol.

a reply to: Antisocialist

Vaccine passports are inevitable. One of the WEF stated goals is to significantly reduce international airline travel. Vaccine passports will go a long way to accomplishing that goal.

a reply to: Antisocialist


One family has been at the heart of funding the concept of vaccine passports mate.


www.abovetopsecret.com...



It's the same family that has 'funded almost everything regarding climate' and the same family that exported eugenics to Hitler (whilst also funding the SS).

[

a reply to: Antisocialist

And requiring universal vaccine "papers" is a fascist measure.

By definition, if you call yourself an "anti-socialist", it implies being "pro-fascist".

There is a contradiction in your processing here.

a reply to: TonyS

they keep trying and failing to implement this stuff not even the left accept the left implementing this stuff let alone letting the right..

originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: Antisocialist

Vaccine passports are inevitable. One of the WEF stated goals is to significantly reduce international airline travel. Vaccine passports will go a long way to accomplishing that goal.

That has me thinking:

Why is it an inevitability? Is it because the WEF/WHO/UN etc. say so? None of these people have ANYTHING to do with OUR respective nations. No one has ever "agreed" with them except "more of the same" virtually self-proclaimed leaders of industry and wealth hoarding.

Exactly who is empowering their 'declarations' in the first place? (I think it's the big bank.)

Not looking for specific answers here, just spit-balling questions I'd like to hear members opinions on.

originally posted by: FyreByrd

By definition, if you call yourself an "anti-socialist", it implies being "pro-fascist".

Apparently definitions, these days, are pliable.

Aren't they all 'neo cons'?

Did find some relevant content (and golden nuggets) in this video.


rumble.com...


Bear in mind it's been taken down more times than I've had hot dinners.

a reply to: Maxmars

That's a long answer. Basically, what happens is that when a US President signs onto a Climate Accord, he/she commits to an international regulatory scheme that takes precedence over US National and States Regulatory schemes. So, for example, when Biden signed onto the Paris Climate Accord, he committed the US Banks to implement the WEF ESG accounting protocols.

a reply to: TonyS

So, the executive branch can unilaterally bypass our legislative branch through foreign diplomacy?

Or am I mistaken about legislative participation in (or oversight of) executive commitments to foreign cooperation?

I could see him agreeing in principle to some accord or other but doing so without the peoples' involvement whatsoever, it seems... not right.

What I'm getting at here is the appearance of 'fiat' in the removal of resources and application of restrictions to the national population. If the legislative branch can "appeal" only after the fact of commitment, again that seems ... not right.

Not arguing here... just trying to pin down whether any American has any say in these mandated demands of a multinational entity outside the US. I expect the answer can be guessed - but would you know of the actual process whereby it happens... when we are told "we chose this reality" emphasis on "we" versus - the political cabal in power.

a reply to: Maxmars

Why is it an inevitability? Is it because the WEF/WHO/UN etc. say so? None of these people have ANYTHING to do with OUR respective nations. No one has ever "agreed" with them except "more of the same" virtually self-proclaimed leaders of industry and wealth hoarding.

the inevitability is an establishment on a power trip akin to the 1930s with the sterilisations, medical mutilations, removing rights, ceasing private accounts, and the most recent legalising death for poverty, health and mental health issues and crafting small areas you have to live/work/love in which is a crime to leave..

the thing is we know where this story ends.. global warming will be the world being burnt down around the idiots driving this..

This thread needs more attention.

G20 is for heads of state, so why does Bill gates Klaus Schwab and the CEO of Pfizer attend?

And they all agree on vaccine passports for the future after the next pandemic the predict will happen any time now, because that's how nature works.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

G20 is for heads of state, so why does Bill gates Klaus Schwab and the CEO of Pfizer attend?

Very good question, almost like it's another Bilderberg.

Anyway more info on the G20 here.




Cheers.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

And they all agree on vaccine passports for the future after the next pandemic the predict will happen any time now, because that's how nature works.

Thought there was a realistic look at the future here regarding China and 'the deep state'.



www.technocracy.news...