How does one state election have 30000 plus more votes than any other state election

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Ksihkehe


Now that Hobbs has officially defeated Kari Lake: gettr.com...

A judge needs quickly order all election materials "frozen" for a few weeks, in case a forensic audit of Maricopa is ordered.

After Nov. 2020, Arizona and Georgia began destroying data and software very quickly, even though their state law prohibited doing so for 2 years!

LOL

They actively worked to prevent audits in an election for POTUS. There were people working in the Maricopa elections office that were involved in creating a PAC dedicated to the purpose. Do you think the effort to delegitimize the SCOTUS was just a passing thing? They're the last barrier left and I expect within the next two years with no Republican recourse in Congress we'll have SCOTUS rulings openly defied, possibly ignored or even aided by the DOJ.

I told people people smart enough to listen a while back that McCain was their prototype for the new "Republican", which is just an authoritarian uniparty member whose "R" is endorsed by the left rather than the voters. When one party needs the explicit endorsement of the other to be consider legitimate and not "anti-democractic" then you don't really have a two party system, you have controlled opposition.

It's over. There is no recourse. The television has said the good guys win, social media is full of people saying they agree and they're totally real people, so obviously we'll be fine.

On November 17, 2021, Meg Cunningham from the Kansas City Beacon tweeted that Richer, "the Maricopa County recorder, is launching a PAC to support Rs running for non-federal AZ offices who 'acknowledge the validity of the 2020 election and condemn the events of Jan. 6, 2021, as a terrible result of the lies told about the November election.'"

Richer retweeted her saying, "Thanks to a few generous donors this is now launching. Join me if you care about traditional Republican 'stuff' (free people, free markets, rule of law), but also don’t believe in conspiracies about the 2020 election or that Jan 6 was a tourist event."

The Post-Millennial

Wonder who the donors were?

The culling that WEF and the left wish to usher in is coming to thunderous applause. From an evolutionary standpoint we're lagging behind where we should be on intellectual advancement and psychological resilience. We're bogged down with fake issues that have no real impact on most people so they can be left broken and paraded out every astroturfed election.

The outcome won't be what those that support it expect. I'm not concerned, at least not for myself and those in my sphere. My advocacy for rational governance and a focus on the most critical issues for long term prosperity has been repeatedly rejected by those that need it most.

Atlas is shrugging boys and girls. It will happen in stages and has been to a small degree for two decades or so. Hope all those little shoulders are ready for the weight of the world. It will continue to get heavier as the burden shifts. FTX was a good example of what the world can expect from the "altruists" moving forward into the WEF future.

a reply to: Annee

Either you’re being oblivious or obtuse.

I get it, I hate making America great again too.
Don’t even like trump….

Deny Ignorance Annee.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: putnam6

My tabulations have 12k more people voting for senate than govenor.

Where are you getting your info from?

Mine is from here.

Learned in 2020 go right to the state site, its a pain in the ass but seems more accurate

Arizona
azsos.gov...

Georgia
results.enr.clarityelections.com...#/summary

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: Annee

So rampant crime, inflation, illegal immigration, record drug overdoses, criminals being released with no consequences, blatant corruption, and mentally handicapped legislators makes America great?

We're you kicked in the head by a mule?

Again -- Right Winger tells me what I think.

Hey -- you forgot open borders -- which, actually, no one supports.

No, I definitely mentioned rampant illegal immigration.

Your party of commies are the ones letting it happen, have been letting it happen. And you continue supporting them.

If looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...

a reply to: putnam6

Based on AZ sos and my previous source, im still showing 12,835 more people voting for senator that didnt vote for a governor.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: slatesteam

Just like AZ being heavily conservative. Nor is it if any consequence Hobbs was Sec of State in charge of ballots.

AZ is a Purple State -- not a Red State

It's about 1/3 Rep - !/3 Dem - 1/3 Unaffiliated/Independent.

Many are voting against "Trump in a dress". Voting against MAGA.

OMG yes.

We can't have people thinking that making America great is a good thing.

+insert Marxist bull# talking points*

SHOCKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

People have their own idea of what makes America great.

Yeah you guys think $10/gallon gas makes America great
Along with $5/gallon of milk and $4/dozen eggs
40 million illegals also makes America great according to you
Don’t forget men masquerading as women in sports and all the kids exposed to the Trans drag shows.
Wait…I almost forgot about the beating, stabbing and rape suspects that get set free because of Liberal policies in Dem hellholes.
America is so #ing great with all that going on thanks to the Dems, why would anyone want to vote Republican?

Simpletons.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: putnam6

Based on AZ sos and my previous source, im still showing 12,835 more people voting for senator that didnt vote for a governor.

FWIW even the Arizona site added approximately 70,000 to the number of ballots cast on the header since the first post.
redoing with the new numbers

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: putnam6

Based on AZ sos and my previous source, im still showing 12,835 more people voting for senator that didnt vote for a governor.

FWIW even the Arizona site added approximately 70,000 to the number of ballots cast on the header since the first post.
redoing with the new numbers

Im not calling you out, i just want to be accurate with the disparity between govenor and senate votes.

Last Thursday i had 30k more votes for senate than governor in AZ for instance

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: putnam6

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: putnam6

Based on AZ sos and my previous source, im still showing 12,835 more people voting for senator that didnt vote for a governor.

FWIW even the Arizona site added approximately 70,000 to the number of ballots cast on the header since the first post.
redoing with the new numbers

Im not calling you out, i just want to be accurate with the disparity between govenor and senate votes.

Last Thursday i had 30k more votes for senate than governor in AZ for instance

LOL, I know you aren't, but it does seem they are still pulling ballots from out of their asses, but the Arizona site does say it's not official yet either FWIW. I mean come on it's only a week later, Brazil had 145 million ballots cast and we knew within 24 hours.

30,000 seemed like a lot, but yes these new totals do show a 12840 difference which is definitely more reasonable.

I guess they validate in batches and announce in batches.

Here's a link to show how far they have to go in vetting the totals looks like another 48,000 to be vetted and added

apps.arizona.vote...



apps.arizona.vote...

a reply to: putnam6

The 2020 page also states "unofficial results."

I dont find more total votes for senate vs a govenor reasonable at all, let alone 12,000 of them.

I could be wrong here but I dont believe I am.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: putnam6

The 2020 page also states "unofficial results."

I dont find more total votes for senate vs a govenor reasonable at all, let alone 12,000 of them.

I could be wrong here but I dont believe I am.

I hear you but it is more reasonable than 30,000 I guess is my point. That said they still got outstanding ballots so it's all a moot point till we get the final tallies.

a reply to: putnam6

Sure, 12k is more reasonable than 30k.

Like 6k more votes for a senator than governor in NV seems even more reasonable.

Now compare to say PA with 13k more votes for governor than a senator.


See my point?

a reply to: putnam6

because its been rigged since 1933

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: putnam6

Sure, 12k is more reasonable than 30k.

Like 6k more votes for a senator than governor in NV seems even more reasonable.

Now compare to say PA with 13k more votes for governor than a senator.


See my point?

Well here is my point

I know it sounds shifty as hell, it's why I made the thread

but yes it makes me wonder about the other states too, the irony is here in Georgia way back when we had Brian Kemp as Secretary of State ie control of the elections in his gubernatorial campaign and this is the one where Stacy Abrams raised holy hell and it's the same scenario here in Arizona except now it's the Democrats pulling the strings.

I'm sure Pennsylvania and Nevada's totals are completely fair and accurate

a reply to: putnam6

I see your point and would assume why most MSM talking heads arent bringing it up.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: putnam6

I see your point and would assume why most MSM talking heads arent bringing it up.

It was so bad Abrams filed a lawsuit against Kemp, that only got resolved this year.

news.yahoo.com... ig=AQAAALd4odrcBxkafs3jOd0cjSIPjbuxFht3Rw7sWXWMDSmOEBm6_YftrviWvlcxvJsKTrCSt_XkB9JyqQBigr12Fn4NL_bslvzOsCOteFtgver8IHDv7rqegYDJrXf-Lz5c16PRtJnXbSvKeEM WkMv6fW8_V_U-d4ZQs1JjxY_O1OsJ

ATLANTA (AP) — A federal judge on Friday found that Georgia election practices challenged by a group associated with Democrat Stacey Abrams do not violate the constitutional rights of voters, ruling in favor of the state on all remaining issues in a lawsuit filed nearly four years ago.

“Although Georgia's election system is not perfect, the challenged practices violate neither the constitution nor the VRA,” U.S. District Judge Steve Jones in Atlanta wrote, referring to the Voting Rights Act of 1965. He detailed his reasoning in a 288-page order.

The lawsuit was filed in November 2018, just weeks after Abrams narrowly lost the governor’s race to Republican Brian Kemp. Throughout that contest, Abrams had accused Kemp, then secretary of state, of using his position as the state’s top elections official to promote voter suppression. Kemp vehemently denied the allegations.

Kemp on Friday applauded the ruling, calling it a loss for Abrams.

originally posted by: slatesteam
See. What you’re all failing to understand is so simple.

Whether or not Hobbs opted not to debate her opponent for a senate seat isn’t very important. At all.

Nor is by any means odd to have MSM run interference, er um explain WHY it was taking so long for this race.

Just like AZ being heavily conservative. Nor is it if any consequence Hobbs was Sec of State in charge of ballots.

And 30k “extra” votes that may seem peculiar is really just very normal for these kinda things. Even when the tallies for others suggest completely otherwise.

Neither does it matter it took a week in the 21st century. Nor does it matter at all that law enforcement was summoned, ballot counting centers barricaded and Runbeck used to outsource the actual tally.

This is all very circumstantial and truly in the end how democracy is supposed to function.

Anything else claimed is just irrational and obfuscation.

C’mon Man!

Edit: it ain’t like it was the last senate seat or anything.

i wonder if calvin was involved.

they need to streamline this voting thing.

repubs 217 -dems way behind in the house.

originally posted by: sarahvital

originally posted by: slatesteam
See. What you’re all failing to understand is so simple.

Whether or not Hobbs opted not to debate her opponent for a senate seat isn’t very important. At all.

Nor is by any means odd to have MSM run interference, er um explain WHY it was taking so long for this race.

Just like AZ being heavily conservative. Nor is it if any consequence Hobbs was Sec of State in charge of ballots.

And 30k “extra” votes that may seem peculiar is really just very normal for these kinda things. Even when the tallies for others suggest completely otherwise.

Neither does it matter it took a week in the 21st century. Nor does it matter at all that law enforcement was summoned, ballot counting centers barricaded and Runbeck used to outsource the actual tally.

This is all very circumstantial and truly in the end how democracy is supposed to function.

Anything else claimed is just irrational and obfuscation.

C’mon Man!

Edit: it ain’t like it was the last senate seat or anything.

i wonder if calvin was involved.

they need to streamline this voting thing.

repubs 217 -dems way behind in the house.

Well, thanks for that, not gonna lie I don't like any party having complete control, but especially the Democrats.

SPAM

As someone from Arizona, this election was completely stolen from Kari Lake and probably Masters too. Everyone I am talking to is saying this was rigged even my hardcore democrat parents who never stray from the party message are saying this was shady.

Both my brothers and their wives who are independent but usually lean left voted for Kari Lake. In every neighborhood you drove down there were hundreds of Kari Lake signs which are unmistakable because it's a giant old-school Arizona license plate.

You can't blame people moving from California because I have talked to them. I have 2 new people on my street from California and the ones leaving are 90% republicans or independents.

I have people texting me left and right ATM asking what I know about the election because they know they are not getting the truth from Fox10 or ABC15.

They had to spin the narrative that Hobbs was always in the lead. That's why they weren't counting Maricopa ballots right away. To get in our heads.

While they were dragging their feet letting us know the counts they already knew how many votes they needed to print and "verify" the signatures. Which they did over several days. They then used this third-party company to inject the Hobbs heavy ballots into the totals.

Now the real question is are Arizonan's going to do anything about this?