It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Vetfather
This is what they are doing right now
This is a developing report.
Arizona Ballots Make Stop at Runbeck Printing Company to Sort Ballots Before They Are Sent to County — WITH NO OBSERVERS
Ben Bergquam was outside the Maricopa County election center and followed a Penske truck leave the center and return to Runbeck. Once at Runbeck, the gate is closed.
more >>>
www.thegatewaypundit.com...[/quote ]
From the Gateway Pundit -- how shocking.
And they were so on point with the last election. Never posted anything extreme or conspiratorial. s/
originally posted by: Vetfather
This is what they are doing right now
This is a developing report.
Arizona Ballots Make Stop at Runbeck Printing Company to Sort Ballots Before They Are Sent to County — WITH NO OBSERVERS
Ben Bergquam was outside the Maricopa County election center and followed a Penske truck leave the center and return to Runbeck. Once at Runbeck, the gate is closed.
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Vetfather
This was also the case in 2020, as revealed by an election worker witness in the AZ Senate hearings. She testified that more ballots kept coming for days from Runbeck -- not from the voting precincts directly. And then, as in now, with no observers or proper chain of custody.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Vetfather
This was also the case in 2020, as revealed by an election worker witness in the AZ Senate hearings. She testified that more ballots kept coming for days from Runbeck -- not from the voting precincts directly. And then, as in now, with no observers or proper chain of custody.
One of those cases thrown out from lack of real evidence?
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Vetfather
This was also the case in 2020, as revealed by an election worker witness in the AZ Senate hearings. She testified that more ballots kept coming for days from Runbeck -- not from the voting precincts directly. And then, as in now, with no observers or proper chain of custody.
One of those cases thrown out from lack of real evidence?
Was the testimony discounted, debunked or the witness deemed uncredible?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: JinMI
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Vetfather
This was also the case in 2020, as revealed by an election worker witness in the AZ Senate hearings. She testified that more ballots kept coming for days from Runbeck -- not from the voting precincts directly. And then, as in now, with no observers or proper chain of custody.
One of those cases thrown out from lack of real evidence?
Was the testimony discounted, debunked or the witness deemed uncredible?
Hearsay. No actual proof.
As in the entire investigation.
One of those cases thrown out from lack of real evidence?
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Annee
One of those cases thrown out from lack of real evidence?
Did I refer to any court case? Nope. Only Senate hearings. So your question is moot... not to mention deflection and distraction.
If you can prove that witness wrong, an actual participant and eyewitness, please do.
The facts and truth are welcome... but not more of this crap.