It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AntiNWO
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: AntiNWO
Isn't Hobbs in charge of vote tabulation?
Isn't also true that she refused to recuse herself?
Both of those statements are true.
This is not the first time Hobbs has been involved is something like this:
On March 8, 2017, Hobbs announced she would run for Arizona Secretary of State.[11] In the 2018 election, she ran against local businessman Steve Gaynor in the contest. On November 6, 2018, the Associated Press prematurely called the race on election night for Gaynor,[12][13] With the race as close as it was, neither Hobbs nor Gaynor initially claimed victory.[14][15] In the days to come, Gaynor's lead narrowed as more and more ballots were counted. On November 16, 2018, Hobbs was officially declared as the winner by a margin of 20,000 votes.[16][17] She is the first Democrat to hold the post since 1995 and is holding the post as a Democrat under Republican Governor Doug Ducey, who was reelected in 2018.[17]
Sound familiar? Link Her luck in elections is just amazing!
originally posted by: AntiNWO
originally posted by: DBCowboy
To be fair, counterfeiting ballots takes time and you really don't know how many to fake until you know how many behind you are.
Exactly!
I love the way people think they can just declare a winner and get away with it. They need credible "proof", even if it has to be manufactured. And that takes time.
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Dems win EVERY SINGLE toss up race but 1.
www.thegatewaypundit.com... ison-2010-results/
Seems legit.
originally posted by: namehere
before you guys were all about paper ballots because its supposedly impossible to tamper with, yet when you lose you claim cheating is everywhere, stop being so pathetic and accept that you lost when you lost.
why do you guys even think cheating is going on? I've yet to see proof, just hearsay and whataboutism.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: namehere
All or most of the cheating happens during ballot "replacement" transportation of which there is little or no records π
Years ago all ballots were counted and verified at the polling places. π
originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Arizona Ballots Make Stop at Runbeck Printing Company to Scan Ballot Envelopes Before They Are Sent to County β WITH NO OBSERVERS:
www.thegatewaypundit.com...
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: namehere
All or most of the cheating happens during ballot "replacement" transportation of which there is little or no records π
Years ago all ballots were counted and verified at the polling places. π
Your proof?
Oh, that's right -- you have no proof.
originally posted by: AntiNWO
a reply to: namehere
No cheating here because you say so, and yet when Democrats claim that cheating is going on, it must not be questioned.
12 minutes of Democrats denying election results
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Annee
And you have no proof there's any verification records of transportation that can themselves be "verified".
Guess what THAT means π
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Uh, this is where people are claiming cheating is being done. If Hobbs has been ahead, why would they need to extend counting and cheat for more votes? As someone in this thread said the extended count would benefit Lake?
I know logic might be confusing sometimes.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: AntiNWO
a reply to: namehere
No cheating here because you say so, and yet when Democrats claim that cheating is going on, it must not be questioned.
12 minutes of Democrats denying election results
Who cares what either side whines about?
ZERO proof of any kind has been documented in AZ of intentional cheating -- beyond the expected percentage.