Telepathy And UAPs

Along with my personal experiences, various reports and studies have shown that these luminous objects have demonstrated the ability to read the thoughts of the observers. Of course just this subject alone brings up several questions of which I havent seen addressed. Not the fact that they can do this , but the method of HOW they do it. I think study of just this one aspect might shed some light on our own processes as human beings.

There has to be some way all our thoughts are readable. Be it locally within our own minds, or externally, as perhaps our thoughts are linked to something or somewhere and can be intercepted, real time.

If anyone has knowledge of any studies of this specific subject I ask to be pointed in the proper direction, or if you have any ideas on how the UAP accompish this task, Id be willing to discuss.

a reply to: standingwave

I will throw this out. I died once. My consciousness was immediately out of my body and in space. The consciousness isn't what science thinks it is in my opinion. Everyone's brains have the same structure. I think they can't define consciousness because the brain is like an interface between the biological and the consciousness. Like a radio transceiver. It is why when our body dies, we leave it and are just as alive if not more than we were moments before, only out of the body. So, maybe that consciousness does not reside inside the brain like many think and is therefor accessible by other means because it is superior to the body.

I often think that the way rudimentary proof of concept ideas are tested out, classified and overtly…..is through high tech toys.



Imagine…..taking this concept and developing into a robust military mind control tool….perhaps even to control UAP’s

👽

originally posted by: KorosStrohna
a reply to: standingwave

I will throw this out. I died once. My consciousness was immediately out of my body and in space. The consciousness isn't what science thinks it is in my opinion. Everyone's brains have the same structure. I think they can't define consciousness because the brain is like an interface between the biological and the consciousness. Like a radio transceiver. It is why when our body dies, we leave it and are just as alive if not more than we were moments before, only out of the body. So, maybe that consciousness does not reside inside the brain like many think and is therefor accessible by other means because it is superior to the body.

I think you're pretty spot on with your assessment. I'm glad you were able to experience a preview before the big show. Now you have to figure out, go to the light or run away from it? Will there even be a choice?

a reply to: standingwave
I think Greer discusses some of this and you could look at the ECETI site. I haven't read anything from James Gilliland from ECETI and don't know if he wrote about any studies. Seems to be in the right wheelhouse though. I know they have some protocols they use, but I'm not super familiar with it all.

.....Along with my personal experiences, various reports and studies have shown that these luminous objects have demonstrated the ability to read the thoughts of the observers. ...

Which "reports and studies show luminous objects demonstrated the ability to read the thoughts of observers"?


A specific example or two would be good. Preferably with some scientific evidence beyond someone's story.

a reply to: standingwave

Along with my personal experiences, various reports and studies have shown that these luminous objects have demonstrated the ability to read the thoughts of the observers. Of course just this subject alone brings up several questions of which I havent seen addressed. Not the fact that they can do this , but the method of HOW they do it. I think study of just this one aspect might shed some light on our own processes as human beings.

or if you have any ideas on how the UAP accompish this task, Id be willing to discuss.

I haven't encountered the "UAPs" as usually spoken of, but do have some experience with various Beings including "greys" and the deceased.

We can compare notes if you like.

a reply to: standingwave

Look up -- Dr Charles Morgan on Psycho Neurobiology and War, Implanting Thoughts in People While Sleeping.


Who knows how advanced this tech is today.

a reply to: standingwave

I have had personal experiences directly linking my non-verbalised thoughts, a UAP sighting and what would be called poltergeist activity. No idea of the how and why of the link but it is definitely there.

Here’s a Phoenix lights story with a Telepathy from craft to Observer angle I have never heard of…

(Of course the amount of craft lights shown in this vid is a video production adaptation of their choosing for dramatization purposes)



👽

As far as I'm aware, they refer to the technology as N.O.R.M

N.O.R.M
Neural Optical Retinal Manipulation

The simplified explanation?

They use your eyes as a type of "network port" to sync your brain optically, using light

It is, apparently, very easy

Also, they do not "read your thoughts". They sync them

The best way to describe it, is that it is like sharing an inverse (reversed) conscious on top of your own

They polarise your synaptic patterns and within this state, what we often refer to as "instinct" or "urge" becomes fully formed thought, from a secondary conscious "mind"

Our minds aren't wired to reciprocate the connection, hence it seems as though they are merely "reading our thoughts", when the reality is, that they are sharing conscious

I went into great detail studying this many years ago

It is apparently very possible to not only connect/sync an individuals physical mind. But also possible to sync a "mirrored (or negative polarity) non-effigy version of the persons mind, for various reasons

The main one seems to be exploring memories, without needing to trigger the persons active sync to find the memories you are looking for

Meaning, that if you are actively synced, you could trigger the person to explore very particular memories. But touching on things like repressed pain or emotion, could cause the person a tremendous amount of stress and torment. To the point where it could feel like they were losing their mind, or being tortured by their own thoughts

The alternated negative sync allows access to the persons physical memories, without needing to trigger them in their active conscious, where they could reject things they do not want to think about

Memory is "passed sync"

It can also be used as "future sync" in order to test will and intent

To see how a person would react, or that they would be amenable to, without actually putting the person in that situation

We are talking about natural abilities here. Something built into creation, and the realms of this world, that we are all capable of, if we understand how it works and learn the application of such understanding

Technologies such as N.O.R.M merely amplify these natural abilities

I can tell you from first hand experience, it is a very strange experience to be consciously awake in the body of someone else, as if it were your own body

You can see like your are them, hear like you are them

You can touch, smell and even taste

Someone kisses them, you can feel the softness and wetness of their lips

What makes it truly strange though, is that you share their thoughts and emotions, as if your are actually that person. Awake in their body as really and truly as your own ....

But at the same time, you are also very aware that you are still yourself, and your are visiting someone else

It is impossible to explain to someone who has not experienced it, but it is like being two people simultaneously in the one body. But that body is not yours

This is what real "remote viewing" is. Most people online confuse it with "Astral projection" which is something completely different

In most of my experiences remote viewing others, I am fairly certain that they had no idea that I was synced on top of them, experiencing everything they experience

This is because mainly, you are in perfect sync and agreement with the person. You have to be in order to stay synced

If it don't, it disconnects you

However, there have been occasions when I have been able to overpower the person I am connected to, momentarily. To take control of them

It takes a massive amount of emotional energy to "push" through in such a way. Something like anger, or love

In these circumstance, you can take control and speak and think as the person momentarily. But only for a moment, before you are disconnected

With one particular person I viewed who was mocking me, I was able to take control for more than a few seconds. Somewhere between 20-30 seconds. Long enough to scare the # out of the people he was mocking me to. Who went from laughing, to freaked out very quickly, when I announced myself through him and screamed at them

The sync works in the same way to how people report Aleister Crowley was able to sync with people walking in the street, by matching their stride and steps, to make them fall over, when he triggers them to do so, by intentionally tripping himself

Except my experiences with this type of sync are somewhat opposite to Aleister Crowley

I find myself sometimes having to intentionally measure myself NOT to influence people

To stop people going out of their way to please me, or be nice to me

The main difference between my own personal experiences and what I have read about those like Aleister Crowley, is that they have no practical understanding of how what they are doing works, they just know that it does

They also have to try to sync in such a way

The way I was taught on such things, it happens naturally, without needing to try

a reply to: Compendium

"Alice", the (deceased) girl in my avatar, would melt my heart with her smile when I was gloomy. I'd even go weak at the knees.

She would never tell me how she did it.

a reply to: Compendium

What are book titles and authors on the subject of N.O.R.M. Neural Optical Retinal Manipulation? Or vids…

👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

If you Google "Neural Optical Retinal Manipulation" there are some scientific papers you can read about studies on neural and cellular manipulation through photosensitive (optic) receptors

You won't find anything written on N.O.R.M specifically though

I have friends who possess this type of technology, who tell me whatever I want to know about it

Apparently our Governments are a long way off working it out, because they don't yet understand things such as (quoting my friends) "luminal key lines"

a reply to: Compendium

There’s squat references to anything you mentioned……

Everything else is….


👽

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

Yes, there is. Second link in the Google search I suggested:

The manipulation of neural and cellular activities by ectopic expression of melanopsin

They do not understand light well enough yet, for selective and targeted photoreception within the opsins

This is mainly because they are trying to digitally interpret cellular interaction with light, within things such as optical gene expression. Which cannot be done

At least, not without a biological computer to interface the cellular matrix. It cannot be calculated and synthesized, because nuclear expression is required to hold and maintain resonant phase within a cell

They only see the native spectrum frequency, without considering the long-count frequency, which promotes and sustains the cell (and prevents it from falling apart)

Meaning, they are able to see how it works in their studies, but they won't be able to figure out how to control it

This is "Luminal key lines"



For it to work, they need interface a secondary conscious. A mind, to interface with a mind

---

This world is given the keys to understanding things like this every day, they just choose to ignore them

Here is an exact map for what CERN are trying to work out ...

But nobody cares

a reply to: Compendium

I have friends who possess this type of technology, who tell me whatever I want to know about it

Assumming your associates are the one's who's footprints I am familiar with . . .

Ask them how many operators they have lost shortly after the remote location calibration is done.

a reply to: NobodySpecial268

Answer (quoted):

We are not the ones you are thinking of

The ones you are thinking of exist within cycles of time

We manage those cycles, from longer-count cycles

We know exactly where they begin and end, as it exists within shorter cycles of our own

We do not align people through remote location. We polarise them within a native loop of their own timeline, which is fluid and harmonious to the natural world in which they were born

This protects them from being interfered with, and/or influenced by any within shorter-count cycles, by making them somewhat invisible and relatively untouchable within the world around them

Until the cycle comes full circle and they are returned to the native cycle of the world they were born in

They never technically go anywhere

These cycles are only ever carried out on people who are born in a particular place, on a particular date, at a particular time

A date, time and place, based on a particular alignment of the astrological cycles

Not because these people are any more special or important than any other persons in this world. But simply because their birth alignment allows them to be synced across certain dimensional barriers

And regardless of what certain religions may have you believe ...

There is not just one "son" or daughter who is aligned. There are many, many people aligned in each cycle

We have never lost one

And none have ever been "crucified", except by the measure of their own heart, and their ability to feel and love too deeply in this world

a reply to: Compendium

"Fair enough" as we say in ol' Aussie.

We are not the ones you are thinking of

The ones you are thinking of exist within cycles of time

The RV'ers I was refering to are indeed "within the cycles of time"; living people. References to "the ol' crow" aside, it was your description of "sync'ing" that got my attention. Along with the word 'technology', presumably inorganic tech. Like a computer OS even if "quantum" and/or "AI".

I wondered about the "operator loses" as these physical RV'ers don't seem to realise that if they attempt to sync with an abductee, the abductors notice very quickly.

Just for context, and I posted the story (sorry hardliner UFO forum people ; ) here on ATS when it happened (lost in my posting history somewhere).

What happened is one night I was in the kitchen with my cell phone on the bench and standing reading it. Then a bust of something like a cross between a grey and a chimpanzee appeared on the bench off to the left. Low forehead and big three inch eyes with the lids closed. The bust started to rotate clockwise about 120 degrees, disappear and reappear exactly like the first instance. Over and over it did that then disappeared. I reckon it was calibrating.

Interestingly I could see the detail in finer detail then my ordinary sight with glasses right down to the pores of it's skin. Monochrome too. Since it was off to my left, one might say it was in my peripheral vision. I didn't move by the way. I reckon it used the UV part of the spectrum of light. Cones and Rods?

"Neural Optical Retinal Manipulation" ~ Curious wording. I wonder, might UV light be naturally optical, yet filtered out by the processing part of the brain? I wouldn't know myself from a sciencey pointy of view. But I have Irlen syndrom which is said to be a processing error in the brain ratrher than the organic eyesight, so I understand the principal.

I spose UV light bypassing the conscious mind and straight to the subconscious mind might perhaps be an exploitable manipulatory vector.

Maybe military grade UV CCTV might trip up these pesky Rv'ers since they are ill mannered and nosey.

Getting back to the uninvited bust in my kitchen. One could see a yellow glow behind the eyelids, that was organic. Follow that back and it was someone wearing something like 3D Virtual Reality headwear.

Sync'ing seems to be a two way street. The sync'er can influence the sync'ee for sure. It works the other way too. I know that from sync'ing with a yellow greys and deceased kids. Little blighters used to rummage around in my memories in a not totally unrelated way to how you have described memory manipulation. One day I was driving and couldn't work out why all my embarrassing teenage romance moments suddenly appeared one after another with impact. Then worked out it was the dead kids having fun. Swearing at them stopped it, they just got sneakier is all. "Alice" taught them. (grrr ; )

Anyways, I reckon someone has tech that is a lot like 3D VR. That nosy Rv'er probably built a "VR room" of my remote kitchen which is the most frequented place and where I have my computer. He picked a good spot. My educated guess is he would don his VR and see in real time what happens elsewhere.

My daughter got the Oculus VR and showed me Hatsune Miku dancing in 3D. The sensation of 3D VR through the Oculus was the same as looking at the bust in my kitchen. Just a tad surreal and more 3D than ordinary sight.

So remote viewing through this tech reminds me of the Nimitz fuss with the horribly named "UAP"s from not too long ago. Maybe someone does a similar trick with Plasma(?) instead of a bust of a grey chimp. I did try to RV what was behind the UAPs at the time and just got "computers". CGI (Computer Generated Imagery) was my lazy thought at the time and gave it little more thought until today. One might say the grey chimp is CGI too. I spose it just depends on how one defines CGI. Reminds me of the stories here on ATS about "Project Bluebeam" - 3D VR projectors?.

If it is some bunch of independant RV'ers with strange tech having fun with the Americans by playing "Alienz", well "go get 'em ONI dudes and dudettes". Come to think of it, "RV'ers" rhymes with "RK'ers". (Sorry, I couldn't help myself.)

So, thanks for the answer to my admittedly awkward question, and my appologies for putting you on the spot Compendium.

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
I think you're pretty spot on with your assessment. I'm glad you were able to experience a preview before the big show. Now you have to figure out, go to the light or run away from it? Will there even be a choice?

I was pretty much at someones/somethings will. About 2 minutes in I realized my body was back on Earth dead and panicked. I was back in my body a couple seconds later. I guess the Trauma docs brought me back... grrrr.

I was instantly out amongst the galaxies and all of a sudden something felt like it hit my forehead and massive amounts of data were flowing in. It was overwhelming. Like the entire internet every second. Today I am not so sure if it was coming in or it was being taken out and the large flow just confused me. The most perfect comfort I have ever experienced. Like wrapped in a warm fuzzy blanket of love. It wasn't my time. I would have been happy to stay.

So, I don't know about the light. I didn't see a light. I thought I had a unique experience because of that. But a couple years later I was watching TV about NDE's and a woman telling her story said she experienced the exact same thing right down to the massive information download. It literally made me think of the Matrix as crazy as that is. It made me think about the theory that we live in a simulation that much more plausible after that experience. I still can't fully get on board with that.

If you see a light focus on it with your eyes and full concentration with the mind. 'Pleased to meet you' is an excellent meesage to beam across as you keep your concentrated stare on the light. I believe a sense of excitement literally elevating your mood to one of 10 out of 10 on the amazement scale can be picked up by these lights. Thank the light for this experience. They can pick up on these thoughts and become connected to you and pass warm feelings back. These things are exceptionally timid, they need a positive state of mind