'Conspiracy Author' David Icke Banned From EU, Labeled A "Terrorist"

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Maxmars

Must have been the reptilians or the archons.

I have no qualms with the observation, snarky though it may seem. However, attacking Icke like this has become a tired old trope to me. We often allow for the interpretation of things we want to hear to forgo such challenges, because we want to hear them. His message is not mine. His past messages aren't either; they are not the point of the OP.

But I agree, that particular characterization of the circumstance of our world does not lend itself to be embraced by me either.

The matter at hand is... Is it terrorism? Do the EU/Dutch leaders feel the public is incapable of making reasonable distinctions when it comes to such 'theories.' Just how little do the leaders trust those who gave them leadership; and were they given those roles because they "know" better, or just because they were better marketed?

This story has value in that it serves as an example of something we have all been witnessing right here at home.

If they can malign contrary-minded individual to the point of creating a criminal... Is it not realistic to assume it has been done before, or is being done today, or will be done tomorrow - for the benefit of the controlling hierarchy?

And all this because of the underlying hierarchy seems deathly afraid of a conversation they don't control.

a reply to: MykeNukem
Nah, they just mention stuff like "he was already under watch because of antisemitic views"
from some newspapers such as the one I posted under OP post (france24)
the usual golden trigger for the idiots (using "passe-partout" words such as antisemitism)
They are actually (according to MSM) afraid that - with all the violence and threats the gov and politicians suffers, he will bring more oil to the fire. Which is correct if you watch this recent video (1 minute video)
Netherland politicians for sure were quite stressed out over him coming with such truth
twitter.com...

originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I've no idea on his notions in that direction; BUT, if that be the case, it is reasonable to expect the EU or EU nation(s) to ban him for whatever they perceive he is guilty of, and NOT being a 'terrorist'. That is a significant distortion of the meaning of the word.

Cheers

They should just have a "we don't like you" list. LOL

I am curious by nature and try really hard to understand others beliefs; I've read quite a bit of Ikes' work and he seems a bit of a nut to me, but who knows? Maybe information will come forth in the future to prove him right all along, tho I doubt it.

Way out - even whacko thinking- entertains me. It makes me think in broader terms and opens new avenues for my mind to wander through.

Thinking 'outside of the box' has brought us the likes of Einstein, A. G. Bell, Tesla, Jung, Benz and so many others who changed the direction of the world. What happens when we're all forced to think the same thoughts and never explore alternative ideas for fear of non-compliance retribution?

Never mind; I already know the answer.

a reply to: MykeNukem

They have.....

a reply to: n00ne

it seems to many saying globalist is now anti-Semitic, which it appears the establishment want to use as another way to enforce compelled speech and compelled thinking..

as paths go its very dangerous to start policing peoples thinking as it'll create the very thing it tries to prevent..

a reply to: MykeNukem

or simply a naughty step list of people they think are poopoo heads..

originally posted by: n00ne
a reply to: MykeNukem
Nah, they just mention stuff like "he was already under watch because of antisemitic views"
from some newspapers such as the one I posted under OP post (france24)
the usual golden trigger for the idiots (using "passe-partout" words such as antisemitism)
They are actually (according to MSM) afraid that - with all the violence and threats the gov and politicians suffers, he will bring more oil to the fire. Which is correct if you watch this recent video (1 minute video)
Netherland politicians for sure were quite stressed out over him coming with such truth
twitter.com...

I bet they are stressed out, especially with all the manure fires and raging farmers, lol.

Governments of the world are scared, scared that the veil they had pulled over the public's eyes is being slowly lifted.

That's why they have to resort to stuff like this.

dang... just when mr Icke starts sounding saner than in his past

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

It looks like this may have been a translation error as there is no such things as a "level three terrorist". There is a "level three terror alert" in Europe.

I agree, everything I've seen so far suggests that his visa was denied because he made antisemitic statements, he thinks that Jewish bankers deliberately sabotaged the economy.

Thank you so much for that. I, for one, find that kind of perspective invaluable.

Words are all we have... and a casual mistranslation can engender what others can later describe as egregious misinformation. I accept that such can be innocent, but I know sometimes it can be employed maliciously.

I am eager to find out which this time.

originally posted by: nickyw
a reply to: MykeNukem

or simply a naughty step list of people they think are poopoo heads..

You sound like a "neaner meaner".

a reply to: MykeNukem

Methinks the Eurocracy may be just a tad arbitrary in their functioning.

Cheers

a reply to: nugget1
Einstein, A. G. Bell, Tesla, Jung, Benz

Einstein, A. G. Bell, Tesla, Jung, Benz..........Icke?

I think your list brokeded. LOL

ETA: I'll be not too impressed if they shed their skin now....and it turns out he's right!

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Maxmars

Seems a bit uneccesary but am I missing the bit where they called him a "terrorist"?

I value your comment/question, but ...

Do you find the inference unreasonable? When a designated terror threat becomes the authoritative factor that restricts our movements, I at least, would be curious as to (barring a threat to myself) what is the contextual sense of the 'officially sanctioned' restriction. Applying a litigious approach to the question, in my opinion, does not evoke a 'complete' analysis of the topic. Although I understand the impetus to do so, it doesn't bring me to a conclusion of dismissal.

a reply to: Maxmars

the issues though might be simpler that they know they done wrong and have managed to radicalised their own populations the EU like the US and UK now they fear anyone speaking outside of permitted thoughts incase people start seeing their countries for the failed states they are (I inc US and UK in that)

In terms of historical similarity I tend to think we are repeating the very process that led to the reformation which crushed the imagined golden humanist age..

a reply to: MykeNukem

it really feels like these supranational entities are behaving like kids in the infants playground..

originally posted by: ArMaP
They mention the Schengen area, which is not exactly the EU, it's the EU minus Ireland, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania. There are also four countries that are not in the EU but have an agreement regarding the Schengen Area: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland.
Beside those, there are also Monaco, San Marino and the Vatican City, which, being surrounded by Schengen Area countries act as de facto Schengen Area members.

PS: the letter states he can object and/or request the alert to be lifted.

Lets see how this evolves.

Bless you, bless you, bless you. My education is sorely lacking in the regional constructs of the area. This does translate into relevancy for a complete analytical effort. There could be many aspects of this banning based upon regional matters of which I am simply ignorant.

a reply to: nickyw

Interesting assessment.

I've never thought of it as comparable to the Reformation, but I can see the similarities, especially with us "heretics" or "terrorists" if you prefer.

originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: Maxmars

Bizarre. How is he a 'terrorist' ?

Cheers

He's a level 3 terrorist...whatever the hell that is.

Do they have level 4 and 5 or 6 terrorists?

a reply to: Maxmars

Eh? I simply asked where was the bit where he was actually called a "terrorist"?

As the thread title suggests.

It was a simple and straightforward query and in no way "litigious"?

Blimey, mate. Lighten up?

For what it's worth, I think Icke is a bit eccentric but harmless and no, I don't think he is even remotely a "terrorist" nor should he be banned from anywhere.