I recently heard a theory that cancer is caused by micro parasites, referred to by mainstream cancer researchers as "extracellular vesicles" or
exosomes, which they believe to be particles of cells. (see video).
www.youtube.com...
Mainstream cancer researchers know that people with cancer have more extracellular vesicles.
They also know that these vesicles seem to be the primary way that cancer cells "infect" healthy cells.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
They also know that known parasite species can "communicate" with these extracellular vesicles to further the parasites aims.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
If extracellular vesicles were in fact micro-parasites, it would support the metabolic theory of cancer, which I wholeheartedly agree with. (see
links)
Dr. Thomas Seyfried:
www.youtube.com...
Jeffery Dach MD:
jeffreydachmd.com...
The metabolic theory of cancer states that something is causing the mitochondria in the cell to malfunction, which then causes the nucleus to produce
bad code. Not the other way around (as the mainstream view teaches).
The theory doesn't propose what is causing the mitochondria to fail, but if the cell was being invaded by a extracellular vesicles it could certainly
be a hypothesis to test.
Cancer Treatments with Anti-parasitical drugs:
It is well documented in peer reviewed literature , that the anti-parasitical drugs like Fenbendazolel, Ivermectin, and Artemisinin, Niclosamide,
Hydroxycholorquin work to kill cancer cells, even cancer stem cells.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
www.amazon.com...
Anti parasitical drugs also seem to have the most genuine success stories online one of which being Joe Tippens
www.youtube.com...
Tippens has also developed his own cancer protocol (what to take and how much of it) Using mostly off label drugs and over the counter supplements).
mycancerstory.rocks...
if cancer was cause by microparasites it might explain why some of the other alternative cancer treatments that have been proven to have limited
efficacy against cancer. that is, because those treatments would also be harmful to parasites, such as intravenous vitamin C and Curcumin.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
It could also explain why fasting and ketogenic diets show limited success. That is because many parasites metabolize glucose for energy:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
There appears to be at least 2 types of these extracellular vesicles (other than the "larvae"), which might help to explain why certain antiparasitic
drugs only work on some kinds of cancer, and other types of parasitic drugs work on other types of cancer (Fenben doesnt have much of an effect on
triple negative breast cancer according to Tippens, but Artemisnin and Iron do).
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
That is because there are at least two different types of parasites that are involved, and just like it is with larger parasites.
Different drugs have different methods of action, which may or may not affect certain types.
This is why a systematic protocol followed by cancer diagnostics probably is the way to go, if this theory is anywhere close to accurate.
I don't even think it matters if these tiny vesicles are actually parasites or not.
Because it seems pretty clear that as long you treat cancer as if it was a parasitical disease, you might have better luck. But please research for
yourself
I figure if anyone else is out there that can add this to or even debunk it, I would be glad to know if to pursue this further or let it go.
Any thoughts?
edit on 3-11-2022 by Amenti because: (no reason given)
edit on 3-11-2022 by Amenti because: (no reason
given)
edit on 3-11-2022 by Amenti because: (no reason given)
edit on 3-11-2022 by Amenti because: (no reason
given)
edit on 3-11-2022 by Amenti because: add youtube video
edit on 3-11-2022 by Amenti because: (no reason
given)
edit on 3-11-2022 by Amenti because: (no reason given)
edit on 3-11-2022 by Amenti because: (no reason
given)