Massive Conspiracy BREAKING NEWS! HARD EVIDENCE U.S. Gov Conspired With Big Tech

a reply to: network dude

Yep. It wasn't for free. They were paid very well. There's a lot of outside money being funneled into US politics. Most of it to the Democrats. Some of it to these tech companies. Why else would Zuckerberg kick in over $400 million dollars to influence the 2020 election?

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: MykeNukem

Well it's finally out there for ALL to see, even the deniers.

I wonder what the response will be now?

I wonder if Elon Musk will be able to add a few juicy details once he has a chance to really dig into Twitter operations... especially after clearing out the deadwood in the company.

And if so, if and how it will affect this election.

It will be interesting to see.

Oh yes !!

Elon-Musk™ is gonna save us all !!!

Yea !!!

It's basically the exact same thing Hitler did, only way better tech to exploit nowadays.

a reply to: Nothin

Oh yes !!

Elon-Musk™ is gonna save us all !!!

Yea !!!

LOLing in the best way... I love to take an idea and "spiral"... just let my pondering go where it will... and this is just spectacular!

From my "a few juicy details" to this. I love it!

originally posted by: Nothin

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: MykeNukem

Well it's finally out there for ALL to see, even the deniers.

I wonder what the response will be now?

I wonder if Elon Musk will be able to add a few juicy details once he has a chance to really dig into Twitter operations... especially after clearing out the deadwood in the company.

And if so, if and how it will affect this election.

It will be interesting to see.

Oh yes !!

Elon-Musk™ is gonna save us all !!!

Yea !!!

Slow your roll there, sparky.

Who said any of that?

originally posted by: network dude
Just so I fully grasp all this, all the tech companies were working hand in hand with government agencies to benefit the Democratic party. And they all did this for free. Nobody paid anyone, and it was all just a little misunderstanding as to the comprehension of the first amendment. Is that the official narrative?

Pretty much.

There have to be some sort of control of online public shared information.
If anyone suggest otherwise they should take a trip to the dark web and experience why that is a good thing.

There have to be, you know, some controls...
or we wind up in the dark web. Ever been there?
You don't even know what to think and
It's dark.

Nice set of controls there, even counts the ballots,
and sets the gain of fear function factor by using biolabs...

I believe they think we're morons.

Well, some of us anyway.

At the crack of Trump victory, all this big tech action was re-avowed,
at the google private insider employee meeting,
immediately after they failed to plant Hillary.

Sergei and his exec budds were wearing matching complementary colored
baby blue and spring yellow T shirts, long sleeve, with huge ass explosions of sweat in every armpit
on stage, in the private amphitheater, to discuss the path the company must now accelerate.

There was the Indian guy, and the caucasian older guy w with the greying short hair,
arranged like a triumvirate, with Brin on the left, as one would face the speakers.
These faces, lips, were mortified with fear since they did not pull the cheat.
Next time would be different.

As for strategies, Sergei said simply 'we know what we must do, to do the right thing....'

I remember his performance the most, because without proper makeup, preparation, and camera angle,
he looked both spindly and huge; fine beads of oilsweat, sheened his nose like a rockface in profile,
atop his spindly tall and hunched frame. I think he had an Art Garfunkle hair thing going on here.
But
No matter where the cameras swept or
were set it looked Biblical, a peek into the infidel camp. Drenched in secrecy and sweat, all of them,
because the sole cause they had by which to celebrate, and work with, was their power to corrupt due process.

Hence, Google et al. would be just one component of all the big tech
behind all the Trump witch hunting, and would culminate to include the
intended media announcements that rounding up Trump supporters was certainly on the table.
They have got to acclimate, gaslight us, into expecting it. Even last month, WGN sextrafficking
crew explained to me that anyone still affiliating with Donald Trump, would 'face ruin', this shortly
after they pawed Melania's panties....

The entire audience, a sea of employees,
wore the company beanies, and to a man, set to double down on cultural and political
racketeering, to which none dared call it conspiracy.

# 1641

a reply to: Scrable

Trump did appoint the leaders of those organizations after all.

when living / swimming in a swamp, your limited to the wildlife of that habitat.

in other words he had to pick the lesser of evil that could pass muster of the psycho pants in congress.

a reply to: XXXN3O

That's pretty funny and sadly realistic.

a reply to: imitator

lol Good one. Mark Zuckerberg doesn't even need makeup. He's legitimately creepy. Even his Meta chatbot said so lol

a reply to: Boadicea

My apologies if you already viewed him as just another scumbag Technocrat™.

Then the him giving us "a few juicy details" went right over my head.

There have been many comments on ATS™ over the years, extolling him as some kind of good guy, and many recently with all of his Twitter™ nonsense.

a reply to: MykeNukem

Fine with me if his local fan-club has gone out-of business.

Ain't no white on his hat.

originally posted by: Nothin
a reply to: MykeNukem

Fine with me if his local fan-club has gone out-of business.

Ain't no white on his hat.

Yea, I like George Soros much better anyway.

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
This is why I'm a moon landing denier. Mostly out of spite. Why should I believe?

Some of us aren't going that far.

Fox Mulder on the X files had that poster behind him on the wall at his desk that read "I want to believe". Well I want to believe we went to the moon. But like Mulder was implying, we need something in the data to help us believe. A lot of things we can't prove from here but those pictures of the planets in our Solar system and the up close landings on the comet recently suggest we have a solar system and not a glass dome. I am open to the flat Earth as far as it is not 100% disproved and we should not totally dismiss the possibility. I just think the clues lead me to agree with the Earth is a ball concept.

The bible does lend clues to the flat earth with a glass ceiling, and it would not a total shock for this to need to be hidden to the public at large to project the hoaxes they need to gain power over humanity once and for all. As far as they are concerned..

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: Nothin
a reply to: MykeNukem

Fine with me if his local fan-club has gone out-of business.

Ain't no white on his hat.

Yea, I like George Soros much better anyway.

Agreed that the Georges-Fan-Club™ has a lot more going for them, than the Elons-Fan-Club™.

Soros™, Bushy™, and Floyd™, good old George-Costanza™, and of course : George-Foreman™ !

Sorry to be off-topic LCH², and thanks for the thread.

originally posted by: Nothin

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: Nothin
a reply to: MykeNukem

Fine with me if his local fan-club has gone out-of business.

Ain't no white on his hat.

Yea, I like George Soros much better anyway.

George-Costanza™

Not sure what you're on about, but...

You mean George "Can'tStandYa"? LOL

...By Mennen™

originally posted by: Athetos
Literally everything there is already illegal and wouldn’t be protected under the free speech. Nice straw man. Only and idiot would give your sentiment a thumbs up.

No one is suggesting the proliferation of any degenerate act or illegal activity that would already be criminal by law. What we are talking about here is silencing political opponents using big tech platforms.

How could you possibly confuse the two unless your who entire world view is some kind of click bait knee jerk reaction.
a reply to: Spacespider

Hey the theme of my reply was "censoring" in general and where to draw the line, I thought you caught that.
Either your a kid or one of those short tempered road rage guys that drives confused around and calls everyone idiot to make you sound superior to everyone else.

a reply to: Nothin

No worries! I'm not a Musk fan. I don't think he's at a Zuckerberg or Gates level yet.... but give him time and who knows, right?

Musk serves Musk. If it serves Musk to spill some of Twitter's dirty secrets, he will. If it doesn't, he won't.

originally posted by: Justoneman

I am open to the flat Earth as far as it is not 100% disproved and we should not totally dismiss the possibility. I just think the clues lead me to agree with the Earth is a ball concept.

I've been up high enough that the curvature of the Earth was visible. So I'll deny a "flat Earth".

Massive Conspiracy BREAKING NEWS! HARD EVIDENCE U.S. Gov Conspired With Big Tech

So in order to save democracy they're literally burning books they don't like.

Take a real God damn look at who the real nazi's are.

a reply to: network dude

It goes beyond that. Literally every local news station brought on a "constitutional" lawyer to tell people the constitution allows medical descrimination.