An interesting court case in Austraila where No consent to contract is used.

I found this interesting, where the plaintiff is charged with violating the Australian lockdown laws and went to court. When the charges were read, she makes it quite plain that she did not want to enter into a contract with the court where under common law is her right. As they have to have consent to govern. The Magistrate tries to ignore her statement by brushing it off with "OK" But in the end, the prosecutor knows she is in the right as far as the law is concerned and drops the charges, because simply if it kept going further it would have been a waste of time as at some stage it would have hit a judge who would have to agree, that in this matter no contract to engage was given or inferred. www.bitchute.com...

Interesting to see it put into action

a reply to: anonentity

a reply to: anonentity

Perhaps the old 'Common Law' defence might have some traction given the ongoing mess that the lock down caused. However bringing up Common Law in any other case will be ignored by the court. People have been trying to use the 'no contract' for years to no real effect. I think it can be used regarding debt collection but courts follow Admiralty Law.

They know she'd be a major pain in the tits to deal with so they just said "f@$k it"

originally posted by: oikos
They know she'd be a major pain in the tits to deal with so they just said "f@$k it"

nah man global warming. Buy an EV so this can be avoided, or be assimilated

the concept of this is if you plead then your stuff becomes forfeit...

In pleading you accept not the law but that they can take your stuff..

the idea behind Peine forte et dure is that by hook/crook or torture they wanted compliance to take your families stuff..

the last case of Peine forte et dure in my neck of the woods was at Horsham gaol in 1735.. the state will always find a way to make you plead even if it kills you..

Horrible Horsham History

extract

One of Horsham’s more infamous claims to fame was that it was the last place* in England to carry out the ‘peine forte et dure’ (hard and severe punishment). Even in those days a euphemism was required to describe being crushed to death. In 1735 John Weeks of Fittleworth was accused of the murder of Elizabeth Symonds near to Petworth. Weeks declined to offer a plea and, according to the law, the courts had no jurisdiction over him. Weeks was found guilty of ‘standing mute through malice’ and was sentenced to the peine forte et dure to persuade him to enter a plea. This should have taken place within a prison cell but instead it was carried out in full public view in the gaol grounds. Weeks was laid down with a board over him, a prison door according to some reports. Onto the door was piled 100 weights, then another 100 then a third. Weeks appeared to be dying and another 50 weights were added. Finally the 16 stone gaoler laid on the board and Weeks passed away