Dr Malhotra: Facebook is an enemy of Democracy!!!

Dr Malhotra has written a research paper which was peer-reviewed and published on the Journal of Insulin Resistance with title:

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part1

insulinresistance.org...

In his review he argues that the vaccination program should be paused at a global level due to serious health and safety issues associated with mRNA vaccines and especially for the non-elderly populations for which there is a greater risk of serious adverse events from the vaccines than being hospitalised from COVID-19.

Dr Malhotra's Facebook account was suspended for 3 days because of a post he put up two weeks ago making a reference to his peer-reviewed paper above on the subject of the pandemic of misinformation.

Prior to this event his account was suspended for 24hours for a post he shared in relation to Florida's Surgeon General Dr Ladapo who has recommended that 18-39 year old males should not use the mRNA products due to an increased risk in cardiac deaths. New guidance now exists as a result of these recommendations from the Department of Health in Florida

content.govdelivery.com...


Dr Malhotra adds further that what happened to him is a symptom of system failure that we are currently going through which encourages good people to do bad things, a system that puts the private interests of big corporations ahead of patients, public interest, and public health, and a system where this legal entity (corporation) has too much unchecked power over media & social media.


And what this ultimately means is that we don't just have suppression of free speech but deliberate suppression of the truth


Facebook has even called one of the most important stories of the pandemic as 'misinformation' in relation to the BMJ's investigation into fraud (alleged by a Pfizer whistleblower). The BMJ editorial team had to write back expressing how incompetent the 'fact-checkers' are. Nothing new here as the arbiters of truth fact-check only in one direction to preserve the narrative and dogma.

So as far as Dr Malhotra is concerned:
Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are enemies of Democracy


youtu.be...


(*) The last part of the video is also very interesting and very worrying as there is a discussion about the pharmaceutical company Merck. Facebook has partnered with Merck to handle vaccine misinformation on their platform. Merck is a pharmaceutical company which is known to have committed fraud and paid $1bn in fines in 2011 for promoting and suppressing data around their anti-inflammatory drug vioxx for arthritis and chronic pian which was estimated to have killed over 60,000 Americans due to its increased cardiovascular risks.

Interestingly, the scientists who conducted the research knew about the serious adverse reactions of this drug and the increase cardiovascular risks it poses. However the drug was marketed as safe & effective and was rolled out in the general population.(*)


Needless to make further comments.

Dr Malhotra: Facebook is an enemy of Democracy!!!

I concur , but I would add "an enemy of the people"

I jumped on FB years ago when my kids went off to school, etc and I could still be a part of their lives thru their posts, (most of which I Approved) plus seeing friends lives and exploits....oh and a cat vid here and there...and I even posted some of my artwork and photos.
I'm not saying everyone should be like me, but in my opinion its too bad people turned FB into an opinion/comment/rant on all things political/social.

A further video from Dr Malhotra here on the subject of vaccine safety and medical corruption.

youtu.be...

originally posted by: Gothmog

Dr Malhotra: Facebook is an enemy of Democracy!!!

I concur , but I would add "an enemy of the people"

I don't have a FB account and never needed one.
Eventhough connecting with others through whatever platform is usually wonderful and a luxury they didn't exist a few decades ago, when these platforms loose their purpose they need to be CANCELLED

I.e let the platform die off.

Alternative platforms should emerge and nobody needs Facebook if they are to suppress information and censor citizens and scientist.

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Gothmog

Dr Malhotra: Facebook is an enemy of Democracy!!!

I concur , but I would add "an enemy of the people"

I don't have a FB account and never needed one.
Eventhough connecting with others through whatever platform is usually wonderful and a luxury they didn't exist a few decades ago, when these platforms loose their purpose they need to be CANCELLED

I.e let the platform die off.

Alternative platforms should emerge and nobody needs Facebook if they are to suppress information and censor citizens and scientist.

I just call .
Or better yet , ask them over or meet them somewhere.
If someone texts me , I just ignore da hell out of em .

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Asmodeus3

originally posted by: Gothmog

Dr Malhotra: Facebook is an enemy of Democracy!!!

I concur , but I would add "an enemy of the people"

I don't have a FB account and never needed one.
Eventhough connecting with others through whatever platform is usually wonderful and a luxury they didn't exist a few decades ago, when these platforms loose their purpose they need to be CANCELLED

I.e let the platform die off.

Alternative platforms should emerge and nobody needs Facebook if they are to suppress information and censor citizens and scientist.

I just call .
Or better yet , ask them over or meet them somewhere.
If someone texts me , I just ignore da hell out of em .

Very good and very effective ways of communication. Classical!!

originally posted by: Zrtst
I jumped on FB years ago when my kids went off to school, etc and I could still be a part of their lives thru their posts, (most of which I Approved) plus seeing friends lives and exploits....oh and a cat vid here and there...and I even posted some of my artwork and photos.
I'm not saying everyone should be like me, but in my opinion its too bad people turned FB into an opinion/comment/rant on all things political/social.

Facebook has become a tool for propaganda and it actually censors whoever doesn't follow the narrative. They didn't have any problem suspending Dr Malhotra's account on two occasions accusing him for 'misinformation'.

Fact-checkers who have probably no education or qualifications and are not comparable to Dr Malhotra but have the audacity to present his peer reviewed paper and the reference he made in it as 'misinformation' and suspend his account.

Dr Malhotra used the insulinresistance organisation to promote his own personal quest because of the death of his father Dr Kailash Chand.

This Doctor, David H. Gorski, MD, PhD, FACS wrote a very good article about the issues with Dr Malhotra on The Science Based Medicine Organisation website posted 3rd October 2022.
Link

Was there anything about immunology, infectious disease, coronaviruses, public health, or anything similar? Funny, but I must have missed it. In fact, as Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz has pointed out, very little has been published in this “journal” since 2016, and at least half of it was published by members of the editorial board, all of which raises red flags for this being an ideology journal disguised as a medical journal:

Unfortunately, in the age of the pandemic, most of these problems just don’t apply in the way that Dr. Malhotra thinks that they do. For instance, COVID-19 cranks (like Dr. Malhotra) take advantage of the low quality and reliability of a lot of medical research to contribute even more to that low reliability by publishing propaganda in journals like The Journal of Insulin Resistance. Indeed, I once called this phenomenon scientific review articles weaponized as disinformation, a label that describes Dr. Malhotra’s two part “narrative review” quite well.

Looking back at both articles, it’s clear to me that the first article was intended to sow doubt about COVID-19 vaccines through the use of a compelling anecdote about his father followed by cherry-picked data. As much as I might feel sorry for Dr. Malhotra because of his loss, I cannot allow that feeling to prevent my directly addressing his misuse of the anecdote of his father’s death to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt about vaccines. The second article is more of a generalized antivaccine rant that uses tried and untrue techniques that try to paint big pharma and government regulatory entities as so completely corrupt (as well as ideology- and profit-driven) that they ignore evidence of harm.

One of the companies I worked for insisted we have social media accounts Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Tik Tok, and others.

It does have some useful features but even business-wise, I'm not sure its positives outweigh the negatives. Many say they don't read it all, or have time to even look at it. So where initially you think you are able to communicate directly to the owner, many times they aren't even paying attention.

originally posted by: Kurokage
Dr Malhotra used the insulinresistance organisation to promote his own personal quest because of the death of his father Dr Kailash Chand.

This Doctor, David H. Gorski, MD, PhD, FACS wrote a very good article about the issues with Dr Malhotra on The Science Based Medicine Organisation website posted 3rd October 2022.
Link

Was there anything about immunology, infectious disease, coronaviruses, public health, or anything similar? Funny, but I must have missed it. In fact, as Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz has pointed out, very little has been published in this “journal” since 2016, and at least half of it was published by members of the editorial board, all of which raises red flags for this being an ideology journal disguised as a medical journal:

Unfortunately, in the age of the pandemic, most of these problems just don’t apply in the way that Dr. Malhotra thinks that they do. For instance, COVID-19 cranks (like Dr. Malhotra) take advantage of the low quality and reliability of a lot of medical research to contribute even more to that low reliability by publishing propaganda in journals like The Journal of Insulin Resistance. Indeed, I once called this phenomenon scientific review articles weaponized as disinformation, a label that describes Dr. Malhotra’s two part “narrative review” quite well.

Looking back at both articles, it’s clear to me that the first article was intended to sow doubt about COVID-19 vaccines through the use of a compelling anecdote about his father followed by cherry-picked data. As much as I might feel sorry for Dr. Malhotra because of his loss, I cannot allow that feeling to prevent my directly addressing his misuse of the anecdote of his father’s death to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt about vaccines. The second article is more of a generalized antivaccine rant that uses tried and untrue techniques that try to paint big pharma and government regulatory entities as so completely corrupt (as well as ideology- and profit-driven) that they ignore evidence of harm.

Yes anyone who challenges the narrative has some agenda. How did you discover it? Let's go over each one of the thousands of people.

originally posted by: Kurokage
Dr Malhotra used the insulinresistance organisation to promote his own personal quest because of the death of his father Dr Kailash Chand.

This Doctor, David H. Gorski, MD, PhD, FACS wrote a very good article about the issues with Dr Malhotra on The Science Based Medicine Organisation website posted 3rd October 2022.
Link

Was there anything about immunology, infectious disease, coronaviruses, public health, or anything similar? Funny, but I must have missed it. In fact, as Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz has pointed out, very little has been published in this “journal” since 2016, and at least half of it was published by members of the editorial board, all of which raises red flags for this being an ideology journal disguised as a medical journal:

Unfortunately, in the age of the pandemic, most of these problems just don’t apply in the way that Dr. Malhotra thinks that they do. For instance, COVID-19 cranks (like Dr. Malhotra) take advantage of the low quality and reliability of a lot of medical research to contribute even more to that low reliability by publishing propaganda in journals like The Journal of Insulin Resistance. Indeed, I once called this phenomenon scientific review articles weaponized as disinformation, a label that describes Dr. Malhotra’s two part “narrative review” quite well.

Looking back at both articles, it’s clear to me that the first article was intended to sow doubt about COVID-19 vaccines through the use of a compelling anecdote about his father followed by cherry-picked data. As much as I might feel sorry for Dr. Malhotra because of his loss, I cannot allow that feeling to prevent my directly addressing his misuse of the anecdote of his father’s death to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt about vaccines. The second article is more of a generalized antivaccine rant that uses tried and untrue techniques that try to paint big pharma and government regulatory entities as so completely corrupt (as well as ideology- and profit-driven) that they ignore evidence of harm.

I see that in your post there is a reference to Dr Malhotra being a crank by another scientist. That is more then enough to refute his argument on the basis of personal and unsubstantiated attacks.
Clearly Dr Malhotra isn't a crack.

The loss of his father is a perfectly legitimate motivation for him to look into this matter more and with a more clear mind rather than following the speed of science.

You may not remember that other people have commented that Dr Gorski has closed ties with the pharmaceutical industries and that he has become effectively the online spokesperson and advocate for the vaccine industry.


Hence your argument has been refuted.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: Kurokage
Dr Malhotra used the insulinresistance organisation to promote his own personal quest because of the death of his father Dr Kailash Chand.

This Doctor, David H. Gorski, MD, PhD, FACS wrote a very good article about the issues with Dr Malhotra on The Science Based Medicine Organisation website posted 3rd October 2022.
Link

Was there anything about immunology, infectious disease, coronaviruses, public health, or anything similar? Funny, but I must have missed it. In fact, as Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz has pointed out, very little has been published in this “journal” since 2016, and at least half of it was published by members of the editorial board, all of which raises red flags for this being an ideology journal disguised as a medical journal:

Unfortunately, in the age of the pandemic, most of these problems just don’t apply in the way that Dr. Malhotra thinks that they do. For instance, COVID-19 cranks (like Dr. Malhotra) take advantage of the low quality and reliability of a lot of medical research to contribute even more to that low reliability by publishing propaganda in journals like The Journal of Insulin Resistance. Indeed, I once called this phenomenon scientific review articles weaponized as disinformation, a label that describes Dr. Malhotra’s two part “narrative review” quite well.

Looking back at both articles, it’s clear to me that the first article was intended to sow doubt about COVID-19 vaccines through the use of a compelling anecdote about his father followed by cherry-picked data. As much as I might feel sorry for Dr. Malhotra because of his loss, I cannot allow that feeling to prevent my directly addressing his misuse of the anecdote of his father’s death to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt about vaccines. The second article is more of a generalized antivaccine rant that uses tried and untrue techniques that try to paint big pharma and government regulatory entities as so completely corrupt (as well as ideology- and profit-driven) that they ignore evidence of harm.

Yes anyone who challenges the narrative has some agenda. How did you discover it? Let's go over each one of the thousands of people.

Have a look at the ties this guy Gorski has with the Pharmaceutical Companies. Just a simple Google search will do the job.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

His argument has not been refuted at all.

It has just been dismissed by you as it goes against your beliefs.

There is a big difference.

originally posted by: putnam6
One of the companies I worked for insisted we have social media accounts Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Tik Tok, and others.

It does have some useful features but even business-wise, I'm not sure its positives outweigh the negatives. Many say they don't read it all, or have time to even look at it. So where initially you think you are able to communicate directly to the owner, many times they aren't even paying attention.

Unfortunately FB has become a propaganda machine and needs to be cancelled i.e people need to abandon this platform. As Dr Malhotra said FB is the enemy of democracy.

originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: Asmodeus3

His argument has not been refuted at all.

It has just been dismissed by you as it goes against your beliefs.

There is a big difference.

Thanks for telling us.

But no. It has been refuted as he made claims that Dr Malhotra is a crank through his link. He is not though as everyone knows.

He then presented Gorski as the arbiter of truth, the guy who accused Dr Malhotra, being himself tied to the pharmaceutical companies and a vaccine advocate-spokesperson for the industry.

As for FB it is indeed a platform that needs to be abandoned and de-funded.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

You are trying to speak for everyone again aren't you?

Remember how we talked about how you only speak for yourself and everyone else does the same here?

Doctor Malhotra seemed happy to use facebook right up until they acted in a way that affected him personally.

It seems that facebook and democracy have little to do with this and its more about him getting pulled up again for spouting his baseless claims.

Keep on defending these people if you choose to but don't act surprised when the rest of the world calls them out for being what they are.

originally posted by: nonspecific
a reply to: Asmodeus3
Doctor Malhotra seemed happy to use facebook right up until they acted in a way that affected him personally.

Yeah, that's how things work. You seem happy with your choices until you are proven wrong. Your brother dies 3 days after the vaccine you suggested he get. It either wakes you up or you lie to yourself. When people learn new information they are able to change their opinions about things. Unlike you who never ever changes their mind no matter what you're shown.