So did 2000 mules actually have anything?

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian
a reply to: frogs453

Source?

The link is in this thread. Maybe page 3? If you read the thread you'll find it.

Theres 2 links on page 2. This one says nothing about the FBI:
www.washingtonpost.com...

This one just about the fingerprints on envelopes:

www.washingtonpost.com...

Can you help me with a source about the FBI following up or not?

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian
a reply to: frogs453

They wore 1 glove. Not even 2. Are you wearing one?

At that time to pump gas, sure did. Didn't need both hands for the pump.

And when you went voting?

Paying illegals in Arizona to vote, was a real eye opener.

Congress will take it from here.

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian
a reply to: frogs453

Source?

The link is in this thread. Maybe page 3? If you read the thread you'll find it.

Theres 2 links on page 2. This one says nothing about the FBI:
www.washingtonpost.com...

This one just about the fingerprints on envelopes:

www.washingtonpost.com...

Can you help me with a source about the FBI following up or not?

Sure. I apologize. I thought you were seeking the Dinesh interview.

The letter also states that despite claims of "a source" that can prove ballot harvesting, the Georgia GOP chairman and True the Vote have not provided that source to the GBI or Federal Bureau of Investigation "despite repeated requests."

GPB News

a reply to: ElitePlebeian


It was very cold here so I had on both. If it was warm, again I would have used one disposable as I only needed 1 hand to open the box. Then I would have a second left in my pocket or car if I happened to need it later. Saved throwing out an unused one.

When I drop mine off tomorrow, I won't wear any. Not many still wear gloves because of covid anymore. But, again, I will be dropping off four ballots. Thank goodness I don't need to drop off a library book. Otherwise my phone would be stopped at a 2nd drop box.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: CrazyWater

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: S2022
a reply to: ChiefD

Yeah dont think for yourself, just believe what I say

Where we dupe one, we dupe all!

Would that apply to your numerous responses on the Covid and Vaxx threads that are increasingly being shown to be absolutely false?

In regard to my COVID and vax posts, I usually only echo the official and orthodox opinions. I think you will find that, more often than not, I have been correct. Though I do accede that there have been times i have used inappropriate metaphor or allegory.

It is actually fairly funny that I am often accused of being a mindless follower, by numerous doom-porn believing 'conspirasists' who are not even original enough to phrase their counter arguments in their own vocabulary. All the sheep bleat the same.

LOL, it's funny in that you would pretend not to be a mindless drone, but admit to it at the same time.

Having an opinion that aligns with the most strongly evidenced and credible does not mean that I have just taken someone else's word for it.

As explained, I have taken a skeptical approach.

To assume a default that there is some unassailable and always correct source, is to fall for the logical fallacy of argument from authority.

TRUMP WON

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian

originally posted by: frogs453

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian
a reply to: frogs453

Source?

The link is in this thread. Maybe page 3? If you read the thread you'll find it.

Theres 2 links on page 2. This one says nothing about the FBI:
www.washingtonpost.com...

This one just about the fingerprints on envelopes:

www.washingtonpost.com...

Can you help me with a source about the FBI following up or not?

Sure. I apologize. I thought you were seeking the Dinesh interview.

The letter also states that despite claims of "a source" that can prove ballot harvesting, the Georgia GOP chairman and True the Vote have not provided that source to the GBI or Federal Bureau of Investigation "despite repeated requests."

GPB News

Apparantly the reason the witnesses came forward is because they promissed their names wouldnt be disclosed. So for an investigation theyre not going to turn them over, like promissed;

dailyangle.com...

They did however turn over the phone numbers that were suspicious, the letter from the GBI in the tweet on the GPB-site proves as much.

Pretty telling how one state uses the information in the movie to conduct searches (Arizona), but another (Georgia) thinks its just "interesting" but are not willing to use the camera footage, or use the phone numbers that were turned over and find those people themselves, instead they want the names of witnesses who were promissed anonimity...

But since you think voting with one glove and throwing it away in Arizona where its freezing cold is totally normal, I cant expect you to smell the corruption here.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: ElitePlebeian


It was very cold here so I had on both. If it was warm, again I would have used one disposable as I only needed 1 hand to open the box. Then I would have a second left in my pocket or car if I happened to need it later. Saved throwing out an unused one.

When I drop mine off tomorrow, I won't wear any. Not many still wear gloves because of covid anymore. But, again, I will be dropping off four ballots. Thank goodness I don't need to drop off a library book. Otherwise my phone would be stopped at a 2nd drop box.

And then after voting you would throw that one glove away?

a reply to: bloodymarvelous

I'm trying to decide whether to waste the time, and money, to see it.

A performance piece you need to pay for hardly constitutes evidence of the credible sorts.

Else that evidence would have been presented in court and Trump and his team would not have lost more than 63 lawsuits.

a reply to: ElitePlebeian

Really? AZ investigated? With what info?

Last week, Arizona Attorney General Chief Special Agent Reginald Grigsby wrote a memo to the FBI and IRS, recommending they investigate the finances of Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips because they allegedly made false public statements, never delivered evidence of the “2,000 Mules” conspiracy, and raised “considerable sums of money” at the same time.

He added True the Vote publicly claimed they provided the Attorney General and the FBI with data detailing an election fraud scheme, including a hard drive.

“Not only is this patently false,” Grigsby wrote, “TTV acknowledged to us during a meeting with them they had not given us the information."

True the Vote states they no longer trust the AG's Office and is willing to provide a hard drive of the data to any law enforcement agency that produces a subpoena for it.

However, back in August, Phillips and Engelbrecht are seen in a video telling a crowd in Phoenix that Chinese hackers deleted the alleged data connected to "2,000 Mules."

They announced a new website to collect video and evidence from activists and appeared to encourage followers to forget about “2,000 Mules” entirely.

“That is the end of Mules,” Phillips said.

“The end of Mules. And scene. We’re done,” Engelbrecht said.

12 News Arizona


And, someone claims to be a witness to the greatest fraud ever, but eh, doesn't ever want to come forward with the information that is needed to tie together the circumstantial evidence provided to the Feds. Uh...sure. ok.

And yes of course I would throw out a disposable glove once I touched something back then. Why would I keep it? I immediately pulled it off inside out.

a reply to: frogs453

and you take a picture of the drop box as well, right?

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: ElitePlebeian


And, someone claims to be a witness to the greatest fraud ever, but eh, doesn't ever want to come forward with the information that is needed to tie together the circumstantial evidence provided to the Feds. Uh...sure. ok.

Ever thought that the witnesses are the mules themselves, as shown in the movie? Or otherwise its very normal for witnesses who want anonimity that they are afraid of a lawsuit. That is sure yes.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: ElitePlebeian

Really? AZ investigated? With what info?

Last week, Arizona Attorney General Chief Special Agent Reginald Grigsby wrote a memo to the FBI and IRS, recommending they investigate the finances of Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips because they allegedly made false public statements, never delivered evidence of the “2,000 Mules” conspiracy, and raised “considerable sums of money” at the same time.

He added True the Vote publicly claimed they provided the Attorney General and the FBI with data detailing an election fraud scheme, including a hard drive.

“Not only is this patently false,” Grigsby wrote, “TTV acknowledged to us during a meeting with them they had not given us the information."

True the Vote states they no longer trust the AG's Office and is willing to provide a hard drive of the data to any law enforcement agency that produces a subpoena for it.

However, back in August, Phillips and Engelbrecht are seen in a video telling a crowd in Phoenix that Chinese hackers deleted the alleged data connected to "2,000 Mules."

They announced a new website to collect video and evidence from activists and appeared to encourage followers to forget about “2,000 Mules” entirely.

“That is the end of Mules,” Phillips said.

“The end of Mules. And scene. We’re done,” Engelbrecht said.

12 News Arizona

True the votes response;

www.truethevote.org...

So Georgia confirms the data exists, so not sure whats going on in Arizona, but its quite obvious theyre trying to smear Truethevote (who arent even partisan) or worse.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: frogs453

and you take a picture of the drop box as well, right?

Yea and covering your license plate: www.thegatewaypundit.com...

All completely normal voting behaviour.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: frogs453

and you take a picture of the drop box as well, right?

Nah but I'm not a millennial that takes selfies non stop. Like all the ones you can see on Instagram of people with their ballots at drop boxes.

originally posted by: ElitePlebeian

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: frogs453

and you take a picture of the drop box as well, right?

Yea and covering your license plate: www.thegatewaypundit.com...

All completely normal voting behaviour.

Guess you didn't click on the proof in your link, shows that poll watchers are covering their plates as well.

Complaints have been filed that poll watchers are video taping and taking photos of plates of those dropping off ballots. It's gotten so bad people recommend taking an Uber to drop off ballots. Do you want armed people tracking you down just because you voted? Anyway, arrest anyone doing it, or have the police enforce law prohibiting the photos of plates.

a reply to: bloodymarvelous

On Tucker they were saying that the actual election was actually decided by 2150 votes?

a reply to: ElitePlebeian

Yeah you might have missed in the link in the article to the video, that they both state the data is no longer available to give to anyone and they have to do this all over again. I'm sure they are taking donations if you want to help line their pockets some more.

Here is the direct link from the article that takes you to their video months before this statement on their website that states the data was hacked and is now "junk" and 2000 mules is done.

Link

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: ElitePlebeian

Yeah you might have missed in the link in the article to the video, that they both state the data is no longer available to give to anyone and they have to do this all over again. I'm sure they are taking donations if you want to help line their pockets some more.

Here is the direct link from the article that takes you to their video months before this statement on their website that states the data was hacked and is now "junk" and 2000 mules is done.

Link

Irrelvant, fact is GBI confirmed they received the data. Maybe they had a back up made or recovered it after all or something taken out of context, cba to put more time into it and see you make up excuses. Fact is the data is real, and at some point delivered to investigators, who chose to sit on it, because they refused to give them witnesses on top of that.