It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RAY1990
Feels like there's metal teeth hiding in the grass somewhere or it's a huge massive derp.
• "The opposite conclusion could have been drawn from The Condon Report's content, namely, that a phenomenon with such a high ratio of unexplained cases (about 30 percent) should arouse sufficient scientific curiosity to continue its study.. From a scientific and engineering standpoint, it is unacceptable to simply ignore substantial numbers of unexplained observations.. the only promising approach is a continuing moderate-level effort with emphasis on improved data collection by objective means.. involving available remote sensing capabilities and certain software changes."
Ronald D. Story - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics UFO Subcommittee - New York: Doubleday, 1980.
Link
originally posted by: 38181
I don’t understand the threat of UAP to aviation safety..
originally posted by: RAY1990
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
I'll never knock an honest approach though! Cheers for posting this, it's very interesting isn't it?
originally posted by: 38181
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
I don’t understand the threat of UAP to aviation safety. When was the last time an aircraft, General Aviation or Commercial or military have a mid-air incident and crashed due to a confirmed UAP?
originally posted by: RAY1990
The reality could be flying tea cups..
• "The government has manipulated the results scientific studies, such as the one done by Battelle, to show that they found noting when in fact they did. In other cases it has set up panels that purported to scientifically examine the subject, but instead used them to debunk the phenomena, such as those of Robertson and Condon."
Battelle Researcher Dr. Irena Scott Ph.D.
• "This was a good report, but the Air Force deliberately tried to mislead the public. The report actually showed that 21.5% of the sightings were unknowns."
Stanton Friedman, Physicist.
Video
originally posted by: 38181
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
I don’t understand the threat of UAP to aviation safety. When was the last time an aircraft, General Aviation or Commercial or military have a mid-air incident and crashed due to a confirmed UAP?
originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
a reply to: VulcanWerks
Kindly keep us posted….if you’d like……unless of course they make you sign NDA(s)
👽
originally posted by: 38181
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
I don’t understand the threat of UAP to aviation safety. When was the last time an aircraft, General Aviation or Commercial or military have a mid-air incident and crashed due to a confirmed UAP?