These COVID Statistics Are Mind Blowing

It was probably a test to see how far they can control things . They also want to reset a lot of the way things are done.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

maybe because .......
IT WAS A FAKE PANDEMIC FROM THOSE ELITES AT DAVOS..
called EVENT 201, FROM JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY.

however, now that they combined these 2 strains,
either it will be released just in time for midterms,,,,
or
HELD IN WAIT IN CASE REPUBLICANS TAKE PRESIDENCY IN 2024
www.rt.com...

Statistics at a global level are never going to be accurate. What I can say from personal experience is that I don’t know a single person who’s either been hospitalised or died from Covid. Considering the vast majority of my family are unvaccinated and that my company has 400 employees I find that telling. Most of the people that died were already in care homes or hospitals for other ailments and at the end of their lives.

The pandemic was blown totally out of proportion and the virus is no worse than the common flu.

Trying to twist figures and lies to fit the narrative is wearing thin. You guys swallowed the BS and now you’re trying to justify the hysteria that you promoted.

Keep on gobbling it up, it’s actually become entertaining at the stupidity of people defending the pandemic response. Big government shills clearly don’t know when to give up.

a reply to: cappie

I fear you might be onto something here. It was more a political tool than anything, covid is a psychological disease. The timing and origins are highly convenient and suspicious.

Since the title of this thread is:

"These COVID Statistics Are Mind Blowing"

I would like to share some mind blowing statistics from Australia:

If we believe the statisticians

- Australia has a population of just under 26 million

- 10.3 million got covid ( with a potential pcr false positive rate of up to 96%)
www.abs.gov.au...

- 15,490 people died WITH covid, BUT the overwhelming majority, at least 70%, had an average of 1.6 comorbidities
www1.racgp.org.au...


- The median age for those who died from COVID-19 was 83.7 years (81.2 years for males, 86.0 years for females).
www.abs.gov.au...

- Median Life expectancy in Australia is 83.9 years
www.aihw.gov.au...

- on the subject of IFR the following is touted by some experts:
:.....One meta-analysis published in December 2020 estimated a global IFR of 0.68 per cent, while another published in October gave a median of 0.27 per cent across 51 locations. Both noted that the fatality rates differed greatly between countries based on their demographics and their numbers of deaths due to the disease."

www.aap.com.au...

This was almost 2 years ago, we can argue about IFR, CFR, or RO number but the summary below makes the whole pandemic to be a show that is almost certainly about control and how far you can push a group of people before they fight back.

So in summary, In Australia, a wealthy Western nation with an ageing population, the average age of death with, not of, covid-19, is almost identical to the median life expectancy, around 83, BUT with at least 1 comorbidity in at least 70% of "victims".

Sidenote, the flu in 2017 in Australia in 6 months killed more people than Covid did in the whole of 2020

www.abc.net.au...

www.health.gov.au...

Sidenote 2: we have had influenza since at least 1173:

en.wikipedia.org...

Then flu disappears and coronavirus appears

The a few years later coronavirus starts to become old news and all of a sudden there are predictions of a bumper flu season after it's mysterious hiatus.

It's a strange strange world peeps ....

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
For an overall IFR of .15%.

Already stated so many times but indeed!
IFR=0.15%

But if you look at the tables for a moment you will see that for the age group 0-19 the chances you die from Covid is 0.0003% i.e 3 deaths in a million infections.

The next group 20-29 has 0.003% i.e 3 deaths in 100,000 infections.

30-39 the chance is 1 in 10,000

The numbers debunk all measures that have been taken including closing schools, universities, coffee shops, libraries, etc, where many young and healthy people spend their time.

The numbers above are for the general populations and I suppose they include everyone in the group with all health conditions. However they don't differentiate between healthy individuals and those who may have underlying health conditions.

If you are healthy and in any of these groups the chance you die from Covid is effectively zero.

originally posted by: Blue_Jay33

The infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19 among non-elderly people in the absence of vaccination or prior infection is important to estimate accurately, since 94% of the global population is younger than 70 years and 86% is younger than 60 years.

Fatality Rate of covid in non-elderly people PRE-VACCINATION was lower than previously suggested.

0.0003% - 0-19yrs
0.003% - 20-29yrs
0.011% - 30-39yrs
0.035% - 40-49yrs
0.129% - 50-59yrs
0.501% - 60-69yrs

And we shut down the world, fired people from jobs, forced people to get jabs, made little kids wear masks, shut schools down, when the true fatality rate was 1/2 percent for everybody under 69........how insane is that?
Everybody of school age .0003% IFR rate, why would we ever force them, of all people, the risks were way higher than the any possible rewards for them. What a bogus sham.

LINK
IFR ARTICLE

Statistically; is this the least lethal pandemic in the history of the world ?

Doesn’t make sense does it? But something does.

a reply to: Asmodeus3

10% IFR vs .15% IFR

Statistics don't lie, one is a real pandemic the other a propaganda pandemic no worse than a bad cold/flu season, remember in years gone buy, when it seemed everybody was getting sick, some worse than other. I remember those years.
And even this IFR is jacked up with 75% dying from 4 other co-morbidities according to the CDC, Covid was the fifth and final nail in the coffin, these same people with those same co-morbidities would be dying from influenzas in previous years, these types of deaths have gone on for decades and nobody ever freaked out, especially with older people.

Who still remembers all the people on this very site freaking out and then being very hateful towards people who remained rational? And now those same people are acting like they never went full tilt into fear mode and are now acting like they were always rational and in many cases say they were never supportive of the mandates even though they were doing they're damndest to push the vaccines through appeals to emotions and other forms of social coercion..

lmao

originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: Asmodeus3

10% IFR vs .15% IFR

Statistics don't lie, one is a real pandemic the other a propaganda pandemic no worse than a bad cold/flu season, remember in years gone buy, when it seemed everybody was getting sick, some worse than other. I remember those years.
And even this IFR is jacked up with 75% dying from 4 other co-morbidities according to the CDC, Covid was the fifth and final nail in the coffin, these same people with those same co-morbidities would be dying from influenzas in previous years, these types of deaths have gone on for decades and nobody ever freaked out, especially with older people.

The issue is that most people are not informed well and certainly don't understand even basic statistics. There is a massive gap in knowledge and understanding of the basics and this is why the can be easily manipulated.

Initially Covid was sold as if it was the Spanish Flu. Anyone with a bit of knowledge and common sense should have said no to everything they was emerging from the mainstream propaganda machine.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33
They should bring out the increased numbers of cancer after a year and on this moment in time from people who got cancer or cancer that speeded after those damn vaccines, people are dying by the numbers around me from that disease.

And I fear for my own life because of taking that gd vaccine

originally posted by: Edumakated
50 years from now people will look back on the Covid Pandemic as a form of mass hysteria.

As I've stated from the beginning, you have to ask why there was such an over reaction from authorities? The most obvious answer is that the govt knew C19 was a man-made virus. They most likely had no idea how bad it could get (or not). So they over reacted in order to try to protect the public. This is also why they were so eager as well to squash dissent and censor.

Basically, they were responding with the goal of actually protecting the public and trying to prevent the spread, but at the same time, they were also trying to cover up the origins of the virus and prevent implicating themselves in its development.

No doubt about that, agreed totally... Why did all the governments agree to do it is the bizarre thing to ask. For their New World Order which failed terribly if you ask me.. I think it had something to do with the Trump/Clinton election and Hillary losing..