It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The people familiar with the investigation said agents have gathered witness accounts indicating that, after Trump advisers received a subpoena in May for any classified documents that remained at Mar-a-Lago, Trump told people to move boxes to his residence at the property. That description of events was corroborated by the security-camera footage, which showed people moving the boxes, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: network dude
Well, there's the original WaPo article:
The people familiar with the investigation said agents have gathered witness accounts indicating that, after Trump advisers received a subpoena in May for any classified documents that remained at Mar-a-Lago, Trump told people to move boxes to his residence at the property. That description of events was corroborated by the security-camera footage, which showed people moving the boxes, said the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation.
Let's not also forget that PRESIDENT Obama had been sending (and presumably receiving) pseudonymous emails on that very same server, bypassing the same laws and regs for preservation of the PRESIDENT's correspondence and documents.
And those emails are still sealed to this day.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: ElectricUniverse
Boxes full of classified documents are hearsay? What's your definition of physical evidence?
originally posted by: fencesitter85
So after pages of the usual and expected "lol sources lmao" can we try one thing: let's assume it is true. Let's assume the sources come through, the video gets released and corroborates the story.
What do the pro trump crew think then? Honestly what would be your view? Without referencing Biden, Obama or any Clintons. What would you actually think and say in response?
Rep. James Comer, the top Republican on the House Oversight and Reform Committee, and Rep. Jim Jordan, the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, request a tranche of documents be turned over to them in a letter to acting Archivist Debra Steidel Wall, saying they have suspicions there was collusion between her agency and congressional Democrats in the effort to get the FBI to investigate allegations Trump possessed records with classified markings on them.
"Committee Republicans have learned that NARA's actions initiated the Department of Justice's (DOJ) criminal investigation against the former president the same day committee Democrats inquired about whether a referral to DOJ had been made," the two lawmakers wrote.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: olaru12
What "evidence" say you?...
The "Russian collusion hoax"? Which came from...Russian officials and Russian spies because a foreign agent paid by Hillary and the DNC, Christopher Steele, decided to pay his Russian friends so they could lie about President Trump because the Russian's/Putin didn't want Trump as POTUS, they wanted Hillary?...
Or any of the what now, dozens upon dozens of hoaxes and lies you/anti-Trump cultists keep regurgitating?
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: olaru12
What "evidence" say you?...
The "Russian collusion hoax"? Which came from...Russian officials and Russian spies because a foreign agent paid by Hillary and the DNC, Christopher Steele, decided to pay his Russian friends so they could lie about President Trump because the Russian's/Putin didn't want Trump as POTUS, they wanted Hillary?...
Or any of the what now, dozens upon dozens of hoaxes and lies you/anti-Trump cultists keep regurgitating?
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. I on the other hand think the "evidence" points to trump fostering a failed insurrection, designed to throw the constitution in the trash in favor of a dictatorship; In fact treason against the Republic.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: olaru12
What "evidence" say you?...
The "Russian collusion hoax"? Which came from...Russian officials and Russian spies because a foreign agent paid by Hillary and the DNC, Christopher Steele, decided to pay his Russian friends so they could lie about President Trump because the Russian's/Putin didn't want Trump as POTUS, they wanted Hillary?...
Or any of the what now, dozens upon dozens of hoaxes and lies you/anti-Trump cultists keep regurgitating?
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. I on the other hand I think the "evidence" points to trump fostering a failed insurrection, designed to throw the constitution in the trash in favor of a dictatorship; In fact treason against the Republic.