Stephen Colbert interviewing an Obama supporter about the plan for Ukraine in 2014

Here is a tweet from Jack Posobiec.

Regarding Stephen Colbert interviewing an Obama supporter for the plan for Ukraine in 2014.
There are those who keep saying Russia started the conflict you are quite wrong.

The Plan for Ukraine 2014 With Obama supporter

As someone mentioned.
There goes a plan something the following.

US wants to destroy Russia and weaken western nations. Look what is happening with other currencies like how the Japanese yen for example is falling with the Euro.

Yet you have the USD dollar rising.
Having weakening other western nations in Europe or Asia like Japan.

This would give the US can have an leverage over them selling gas.

Keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down' - those were the words of Nato's first Secretary General, Lord Ismay

One America News Network (OANN) correspondent Jack Posobiec tweeted 28 times over a span of ten months links to a website the U.S. government says is backed by Russian intelligence.

Posobiec repeatedly linked on Twitter to the obscure website “SouthFront,” which the U.S. Department of the Treasury named on April 15 in a statement explaining its enactment of sanctions on the Russian government, Hatewatch found. SouthFront, in turn, made posts promoting Posobiec. Southfront also cited Posobiec’s tweets in their posts, as they did in February when announcing that Senate Republicans acquitted President Trump on charges related to his role in the Jan. 6 insurrection. Posobiec has used Twitter to promote Russian intelligence-backed propaganda before, as when he served as a central figure in spreading a hack of Emmanuel Macron’s emails in May 2017, as Hatewatch has previously reported.

a reply to: Kenzo

Well, if the SPLC says so.........
and our gov says so.......
and twitter says so.....

a reply to: Kenzo

Your source is Southern Poverty Law Center not very reliable considering how openly Pro BLM they were during the 2020/2019 protests.

Black Lives Matter Meets the Moment

Seven years after its founding, Black Lives Matter has awakened an anti-racist movement that now spans the globe

Currently in 2022.
The BLM faces scandals of wrong doing but not limited to fundraiser/donation scandals.



By the way you didn't watch see the video.

If you did you wouldn't post the link to Southern Poverty Law Center.

WOW, can't believe this isn't getting any traction on here at all!! 😳

originally posted by: vNex92
Here is a tweet from Jack Posobiec.

Regarding Stephen Colbert interviewing an Obama supporter for the plan for Ukraine in 2014.
There are those who keep saying Russia started the conflict you are quite wrong.

The Plan for Ukraine 2014 With Obama supporter

This is the long game. Ukraine was the CENTER of Rus population for centuries. Russians are Rus, period. Kiev was ALWAYS Rus and therefore Russian people. The media wants us to think otherwise.

a reply to: Kenzo

Is Colbert Russian sponsored disinfo too?

Look at you, being a good little parrot for the regime.

You get an extra brownie point for your social credit score.

Russia invaded Ukraine (twice).

You started the conflict.

Not sure how how a comedy interview about how Ukraine wants to be more westernised changes that.

I can't find the tweets now (deleted) but I remember Posobiec tweeting early during Trump's administration that Trump was being drugged to make him sluggish and controllable. He also blocks you on twitter if you remind him of weird stuff he's reported before he cleaned his image up to be more of a respectable commentator.

He still triggers the old BS detector.

I'm getting tired of people calling Ukraine's realignment a "provocation"

War cannot be provoked by anything but war. Absolutely never is anything but fired shots, or the imminent expectation of fired shots EVER a good enough reason to go to war.

The USA's last two wars were triggered by the death of 3000 citizens. Basically fired shots. How many Russian citizens had died for this war to begin?


The civil war in Donbass is the closest thing Russia has experienced. And it was clearly started by thugs who had been paid by someone to start running around with rifles. Where do you think they got the money to do that? Do think these guys are independently wealthy to the point where they can take that much time off of work? (In Ukraine, of all places?)

What I see is: Russia hires some mercenaries to shoot guns at people in Donbass. Ukrainian military responds to those people by shelling the location they are holed up at. Putin argues that the mercenaries he hired are ethnic Russians, and that all ethnic Russians are ultimately Russian citizens (even though they do not have the right to legally enter and settle inside the borders of Russia.....)

a reply to: bloodymarvelous

Russia hires some mercenaries to shoot guns at people in Donbass

The US used NATO as air support for the Kosovo Liberation Army which also committing war crimes agaisnt Serbian Civilian minorities.

But its never the US at fault its always Russia as i would expect you would never blame the US.

I see the usual suspects are back with the same argument as before.

No Matter the facts or the evidence with article provided.

Russia invaded Ukraine (twice).

Russia hires some mercenaries to shoot guns at people in Donbass

That is the same claims you used agaisnt Russians for Crimea.

"Russia has send little Green men to Crimea with guns over people's head"

No such videos, evidences of this had ever come out.


Despite the fact the majority of the ethnicity in Crimea is Ukrainian/Russian.

a reply to: bloodymarvelous

I'm getting tired of people calling Ukraine's realignment a "provocation"

It is indeed an provocation.

Its clear what the objective of the US/NATO are in this war in Ukraine remove anything Russian, whatever culturally or not.

Instated of sending US ground troops to Ukraine the US/NATO are using Ukraine to fight Russia

The civil war in Donbass is the closest thing Russia has experienced. And it was clearly started by thugs who had been paid by someone to start running around with rifles. Where do you think they got the money to do that? Do think these guys are independently wealthy to the point where they can take that much time off of work? (In Ukraine, of all places?)

That is exactly not how it started.


Its sad how some people actually this is how the civil war in Donbass.


Where do you think they got the money to do that?
You really want to go that far eh?

Guess whose funding all those far right militia in Ukraine that are fighting Russians and are attacking minorities in Ukraine on the street side walks?

a reply to: vNex92

Your link is to a comedy interview that shows nothing to contradict the fact that Russia has invaded Ukraine.

You seem to have zero concept of what facts and evidence are.

a reply to: ScepticScot

how Ukraine wants to be more westernised changes that.

You more westernized like how the US currently is with the gender-affirming ideology? is this what Ukraine wants? telling their youth what pronouns they have?

a reply to: ScepticScot

Your link is to a comedy interview that shows nothing to contradict

Its because it fit your reality, nor your narrative, thus you are attacking/criticizing the link.

Unless its something that goes with your "NARRATIVE" Than i am sure you would come to agreement.


I had seen this before..

No matter what i post you will just brush it off.

You already have chosen your side.

a reply to: ScepticScot

Russia has invaded Ukraine.

It was US/NATO that provoked Russia into the conflict.


It wasn't as unprovoked as some of you claim.

originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: bloodymarvelous

I'm getting tired of people calling Ukraine's realignment a "provocation"

It is indeed an provocation.

Its clear what the objective of the US/NATO are in this war in Ukraine remove anything Russian, whatever culturally or not.

Instated of sending US ground troops to Ukraine the US/NATO are using Ukraine to fight Russia

In America, if someone is taking all of your customers away with better prices/service, and running you out of business, that doesn't mean it's ok to go rob them.

In commerce, you have to be able to handle losing, without getting violent about it.

So, from an American perspective, Ukraine deciding to work with us instead of Russia just means we did a better job of being their friend.

It's not something that it's ok to get violent about. And therefore cannot be considered "provocation" to violence. At most it should have warranted some name calling, or severing trade relationships.

The civil war in Donbass is the closest thing Russia has experienced. And it was clearly started by thugs who had been paid by someone to start running around with rifles. Where do you think they got the money to do that? Do think these guys are independently wealthy to the point where they can take that much time off of work? (In Ukraine, of all places?)

That is exactly not how it started.

It happened EXACTLY when Crimea seceded. You actually expect me to believe that was coincidence?

Not coordination. Random timing? C'mon. You must think I was born yesterday.

Its sad how some people actually this is how the civil war in Donbass.


Where do you think they got the money to do that?
You really want to go that far eh?

Guess whose funding all those far right militia in Ukraine that are fighting Russians and are attacking minorities in Ukraine on the street side walks?

The Azov battalion volunteered to fight in a time of difficulty. Ukraine should have refused their help, seeing what their ideals were like. This is true.

But they didn't have a whole lot of better options available at the time.

originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: ScepticScot

how Ukraine wants to be more westernised changes that.

You more westernized like how the US currently is with the gender-affirming ideology? is this what Ukraine wants? telling their youth what pronouns they have?

Westernised as in better standard of living, human rights, democracy. Little things like that

And yes apparently it is what Ukraine wants