It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: MidnightWatcher
Of course they haven't...the west pays their checks.
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: MidnightWatcher
Of course they haven't...the west pays their checks.
Then why did you just claim they had?
originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: MidnightWatcher
The biggest problem I have is I don't trust either side.
There's an actor as president there taking trillions, while Pelosi, Romney, Kerry and Biden all have children on oil boards there, while driving up oil costs, all while the silicone valley superpropaganda arm pushes Ukrain victim, evil Russians, need money etc....
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: MidnightWatcher
The UN would not say if the Russians were in control of the plant, shelling themselves or the Ukrainians. But apparently it has stopped.
originally posted by: musicismagic
Yes, it is under Russian control. Someone wants to end civilization at all cost.
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: TritonTaranis
Knew it wouldn't be too long before someone floated the dumbassed idea russia did it themselves...
More like russia is pretending anyone attacked the nuke plant at all.
It isn't even what russia claimed, they claimed that the input power is no longer reliable - right after russia hit the grid with missiles all over the country.
“The resumption of shelling, hitting the plant’s sole source of external power, is tremendously irresponsible,” IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi said in a statement.