Federal investigators indicate they have enough to charge Hunter Biden: report

In other news, FBI agent in Wilmington gets transferred to Nome Alaska(if they are lucky)

a reply to: SuperDave90

Lucky bastard.

originally posted by: SuperDave90
In other news, FBI agent in Wilmington gets transferred to Nome Alaska(if they are lucky)

The district attorney in Delaware will levy the charges, if Garland approves it.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: SuperDave90
In other news, FBI agent in Wilmington gets transferred to Nome Alaska(if they are lucky)

The district attorney in Delaware will levy the charges, if Garland approves it.

"if Garland approves it"

...Thanks, I needed the laugh.

originally posted by: slatesteam

originally posted by: xuenchen

according to a report by The Washington Post on Thursday that cited people familiar with the case.

Perhaps another DOJ hoax to show Hunter is NOT GUILTY !!!!! 😀

Oh. Cool then.

Maybe just go ahead and lay out all the evidence pertaining to personal and business affairs and let a jury of his peers decide?

Rigged !!!!😀

originally posted by: frogs453
Not sure why some are upset by this, but cool. If they have evidence of those crimes, go ahead and indict him. I won't be making excuses or claim the warrant is bad.

Ah yes, your little disclaimer all set up nice and tidy 🤣

originally posted by: frogs453
If they have evidence of those crimes, go ahead and indict him.

the leak is supposedly from investigators. the charging part is up to a US Attorney. one looking to end his career early.

not going to happen. this drip drip drip is just to give people false hope.

a reply to: frogs453

Exactly. I'd think a lot of people are here would be happy. Instead they're trying to make the thread about me.

a reply to: juulzverne

why would he want Hunter to "knock it off"? How else would that cash find it's way to "the big guy"?

"no reasonable prosecutor"

a reply to: Xcalibur254

Ok so is the FBI gonna raid Hunter now or what?

a reply to: Xcalibur254

don't let your head get too big. Hunter may well have done some crimes, in fact, he documented them quite well, but the part most of us are interested in has to do with what Joe knows, knew, and how badly he is compromised and by whom.

But amazingly enough, now that Trump isn't president, the left doesn't seem to care at all about that aspect of things. Almost like they are #tards with no integrity.

In the 80's and 90's guys like Hunter were made out to be the bad guy in fictional media. The corrupted rich kid that gets away with everything until he doesn't. Isn't it odd that to some people instead of being a bad guy that Hunter is portrayed by them as a weird undefinable hero? A misunderstood artist?

No, he is not either of those things. He is a creep that believes (and for good reason) that he is untouchable.

The only thing I have ever read about him that is redeeming is that he is a Bukowski fan. Maybe somewhere in his soul he realizes what a terrible monster he is and the parts of the monster that his father helped build inside of him.

Its about time, people from the top down need to be held accountable for this and ALL of the laundering and trafficking going on in DC I dont care WHO gets caught up, its time people see prison time

a reply to: underpass61

I don't know. Did he withhold evidence after being served with a subpoena?

originally posted by: juulzverne

originally posted by: frogs453
If they have evidence of those crimes, go ahead and indict him.

the leak is supposedly from investigators. the charging part is up to a US Attorney. one looking to end his career early.

not going to happen. this drip drip drip is just to give people false hope.

Cough... Q = Operation Trust... Cough

en.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: juulzverne

why would he want Hunter to "knock it off"? How else would that cash find it's way to "the big guy"?

true, just pointing out how ridiculous it was to say that the president was powerless to stop it.
only two explanations
A) they wanted it to proceed but were pretending to be opposed (to satisfy the media's obligation to sound concerned)
B) this was a ransom payment to whoever has Hunter compromised.

Both are plausible to me. But A is actually the worst one for people who are concerned about the integrity of the office and our democracy.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: underpass61

I don't know. Did he withhold evidence after being served with a subpoena?

Did the 35 Trump associates that were raided withhold subpoenaed evidence?
Ask Mike Lindell if he got a subpoena.

a reply to: Xcalibur254

Is this a Babylon Bee headline?

I'm sure a presidential pardon will be granted before it ever goes to trial.

Hunter feels like a fake persona.
A different Biden target.
Probably doesn't even smoke rock.
Fake crackhead larper.