They did a real job on Laetrile as well.

Back in the late sixties and seventies, they made laetrile illegal, in the USA and Canada, So people went to Mexico. Sloane Kettering did some rigorous trials on the apricot seed extract. One of the Docs actually saw the results of the trials , But what came out in the MSM was nothing that had anything to do with the trials, which is a bit strange as it showed rather good results in the little mice with tumors. But it looks like these doctor scientists just go with where their paycheck comes from and know what the score is. If you don't toe the line you will get the sack. So it rather does look like the modern pharmacopeia is designed firstly to make money even if the present mode of treatment is a bit ho hum. An interesting story that seems relevant in the present medical environment. www.bitchute.com...

a reply to: anonentity

But it looks like these doctor scientists just go with where their paycheck comes from and know what the score is.

It's not illegal in the U.S. It's banned which is different than illegal. Meaning that hospitals and doctors that accept government money do not use it because doing so would make them ineligible for the government money.

This page has a list of alternative medicine cancer centers that will offer it as a treatment. (most are in the U.S.)
The Best 13 Integrative Cancer Treatment Centers that offer Laetrile

I know you are in New Zealand. It may be different there.

Here is a valid source regarding laetrile:

www.cancer.gov...

One of the main points in the above article is as follows:
Laetrile has shown little anticancer effect in clinical studies

I don't consider anything from a site like Bitchute remotely credible.

a reply to: ChiefD

Then you would agree CNN is the go-to place for good unbiased news reporting?