It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: gortex
For decades, all we've heard is how bad-ass Russia's military is, and how dangerous Russia is to the rest of the world. Now all I hear is how impotent they are. Something is wrong with this picture.
I'm now supposed to believe that one of the most powerful countries in the world has a rag-tag military with leadership that can't plan and run a military campaign. They couldn't collect enough intelligence beforehand to know what they were up against and what they needed to do to achieve the endgame against a small country with a small military and no real armaments to speak of.
Either much of what we are hearing is war time propaganda, or Russia was never a major military threat to begin with. They've just relied on their nuclear arsenal as a deterrent for decades.
The honest answer? We underestimated the corruption of the Russian military. Putin had made a point of cracking down on corruption in the military and overhauling their arsenal. I think it's pretty clear he failed on both counts.
The only reason Russia is still a player on the world stage is their nukes and memories of the Cold War. They have no projection. Their economy is minuscule. And as we're learning, their military is woefully behind the times.
Putin has cultivated a reputation of being the world's premier leader but it's starting to seem like he's more the world's premier used car salesman. He's built an illusion around Russia, but now the illusion is crumbling as it's being tested for the first time.
originally posted by: Nexttimemaybe
I hope you and you nearest and dearest enjoy a wonderfully long and cold winter.
originally posted by: Nexttimemaybe
originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: Nexttimemaybe
No we haven't. It was clear from the start it was a minimal incursion designed to limit damage.
Your true colours have now be revealed. You are in fact a Russian.
As for the rest of your post, you just carry on living your daydream.
That was a no we haven't been hearing it for 6 months, learn English structure better.
I'm not russian. Although I would be more proud to be russian than the # hole you come from.
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: gortex
For decades, all we've heard is how bad-ass Russia's military is, and how dangerous Russia is to the rest of the world. Now all I hear is how impotent they are. Something is wrong with this picture.
I'm now supposed to believe that one of the most powerful countries in the world has a rag-tag military with leadership that can't plan and run a military campaign. They couldn't collect enough intelligence beforehand to know what they were up against and what they needed to do to achieve the endgame against a small country with a small military and no real armaments to speak of.
Either much of what we are hearing is war time propaganda, or Russia was never a major military threat to begin with. They've just relied on their nuclear arsenal as a deterrent for decades.
As of March 2021, COVID costs totaled $5.2 trillion. World War II cost $4.7 trillion (in today’s dollars).
All-in money printing totaled $13 trillion: $5.2 for COVID + $4.5 for quantitative easing + $3 for infrastructure. Mountains of money cause inflation
Inflation causes increases in interest rates, lowering bond prices
Increases in interest rates cause reductions in stock values
All-in spending was approaching $13 trillion as of mid-2021. That’s more than the US spent in it’s 13 most expensive wars combined. We use wars because they’re the most expensive things we can think of. Money printing for Quantitative Easing (QE) appears to have worked, so the plan is to load on a bunch more paper money. Is there no limit?
The major tax proposals include:
higher top rates for individual income, corporate income, and capital gains income;
ending step-up in basis by making death a taxable event;
expanding the base of the Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT) to apply to active pass-through income and making the active pass-through business loss limitation permanent;
major changes to international taxation; and,
a laundry list of new minimum taxes for individuals, businesses, and international corporations.
Another revenue raiser includes government-set pricing for certain prescription drugs, enforced by an excise tax of 1,900 percent on drug sales.
The tax increases in BBBA alone would reduce long-run GDP by 0.5 percent, and the tax increases in the budget, including a higher corporate tax rate of 28 percent (up from the current 21 percent) and international tax changes, would further discourage domestic investment and reduce the productive capacity of the United States. For example, raising the corporate tax rate to 28 percent would reduce long-run GDP by 0.7 percent and eliminate 138,000 jobs.
The magnitude of the tax and revenue increases on the table is unprecedented. The Tax Foundation estimated BBBA would raise $1.7 trillion of gross revenue over the next decade:
$470 billion from corporate and international tax changes;
$516 billion from individual tax changes (excluding changes to the State and Local Tax deduction);
$517 billion from other revenue increases; and,
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: gortex
For decades, all we've heard is how bad-ass Russia's military is, and how dangerous Russia is to the rest of the world. Now all I hear is how impotent they are. Something is wrong with this picture.
I'm now supposed to believe that one of the most powerful countries in the world has a rag-tag military with leadership that can't plan and run a military campaign. They couldn't collect enough intelligence beforehand to know what they were up against and what they needed to do to achieve the endgame against a small country with a small military and no real armaments to speak of.
Either much of what we are hearing is war time propaganda, or Russia was never a major military threat to begin with. They've just relied on their nuclear arsenal as a deterrent for decades.
The honest answer? We underestimated the corruption of the Russian military. Putin had made a point of cracking down on corruption in the military and overhauling their arsenal. I think it's pretty clear he failed on both counts.
The only reason Russia is still a player on the world stage is their nukes and memories of the Cold War. They have no projection. Their economy is minuscule. And as we're learning, their military is woefully behind the times.
Putin has cultivated a reputation of being the world's premier leader but it's starting to seem like he's more the world's premier used car salesman. He's built an illusion around Russia, but now the illusion is crumbling as it's being tested for the first time.
So, are we supposed to just pretend that Ukraine hasn't been treating it's former Russian people terribly?
A narrative alleging the Ukrainian government was slaughtering Russian speakers in the east of the country was created by the media in Moscow, Mr Berlusconi told Italian TV.
He said the reporting, pushed by separatist forces and nationalist politicians in the Russian government, had left Mr Putin with no choice but to launch a limited invasion.
"Putin was pushed by the Russian population, by his party and by his ministers to invent this special operation," he said.
www.bbc.co.uk...
How would the people supporting Ukrainian actions the past several years view similar situations in other parts of the world?
Russia's military has been a joke for a long time.
originally posted by: MidnightWatcher
a reply to: BlackArrow
So perhaps russians should go back to russia then?
Is anyone besides putin preventing that?
In related news - only russia went on back to back land grabbing invasions.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: MidnightWatcher
In related news - only russia went on back to back land grabbing invasions.
Don't sell Russia short. It's more like back-to-back-to-back-to-back land grabbing invasions if we include South Ossetia and Transnistria.