President of the European Council: We must mobilize now

originally posted by: DerBeobachter
Who cares about what a non-elected member of an anti-democratic and artificially created fantasy "union" says? These anti-democratic criminals should be good role-models first and send themselves and/or their own daughters and sons to the Ukraine, to fight the "almighty Satan". They should sit in the dark and the cold first for what they did and do to the population. They should spend their exaggerated monthly income to help the people who can´t pa y for food, electric energy etc anymore because of the sanctions against the people in huge parts of Europe.

But what do they do?

They can´t find enough fuel to put it into the fire that´s burning right under our, the peasants a$$es. They have no money problems, these corrupt criminals, they will have no power problems, they will not lose their jobs because their company can´t afford electrical energy anymore. They will not have to close down what they worked hard for, for decades.

They, these corrupt criminals, created the situation we, the peasants, have to deal with now. We, the overwhelming majority of the people, didn´t want that "Russia will not get back on its feet for years" (I don´t care what my voters think-Baerbock, Young Global Leader and transatlantic controlled), we didn´t p!ss ourselves when there slipped a nuclear plant into the sea in Japan because of a Tsunami and wanted to shut down all of nuclear power plants without having adequate replacement.

We, the overwhelming majority of the people, didn´t force and push the green new deal, didn´t fool/brainwash school kids with a millionaires or billionaires child as idol to learn less but jump more for the government, not even noticing that fact. It were always little, brainwashed circles of people who supported everything the "rulers" needed to push the BS that brought us to where we are now. We didn´t start to swing the wrecking ball in 2020, to destroy midsize companies, culture and everything that was once part of a normal life.

We didn´t create a labor market that is proud to be the biggest low wage slaves labor market in the world(Germany), we didn´t do everything to get less and less money but make the rich richer, money that is worth less and less day by day, money we had no chance to vote against when these criminals wanted us to use their new BS EU-currency. We have not creepingly undermined and de facto abolished democracy, we are not ignoring oaths, constitutions and existing laws. We, the people here, didn´t and don´t support the USA first agenda all these corrupt and foreign controlled transatlantics push to the detriment of Europe and its inhabitants.

It were always the so called "elites", the Bilderger, the Davos, the NATO, the WEF, the G7 and whatever BS, the money bin "elites" who did all this to bring us into the situation we are trapped in now. Supported by a brainwashed minority but with the help of their MSM these criminals made it look as if it was and is the majority who support the corrupt criminals agenda to fill the money bins of the rich, especially those money bins overseas.

I couldn´t care less about what one of these criminals thinks and says, these criminal and corrupt, foreign controlled warhawks can lick my back till their tongues bleed. And with their bleeding tongues they can beg for forgiveness then, for everything they did to millions of people especially since 2020 until today and for everything they will do in the future to make everything worse for us people, until we are happy in 2030 about all that.

Let me Guess Comrade, you live in East Berlin lol

World War 3Z 🤣

originally posted by: TritonTaranis

originally posted by: MetalChickAmy
a reply to: TritonTaranis

Putin played dirty and won by annexing the territory. Nobody ever said war was fair. I am not a defeatist, I want to stay alive. Maybe you are happy to watch the world burn along with Zelensky.

Putin won what?

You said Putin won by annexing Ukraine

But its ukraine/Zelinski who wants the world to burn? LMAO ok comrade Amyski

I suppose Hitler played dirty and won by annexing the territory to right? know who you are yet?

There are more than a few ways to look at this and given the narrative that’s being peddled it LOOKS like the west’s peasants are being prepared for the ‘war against a bully’… or more likely the fallout from it.

Perhaps be kinder in your exchanges? We’re all in the same boat.

To my mind EITHER; the narrative is correct (broadly) evil Russia hero Europe OR; it’s all bull# and we’re wasting time flapping our jaws while the NWO clock counts down to the great reset. Or, OR; the events that are bringing us to this pivotal point in our near history are more complicated than a few lines on a net forum and we barely even have the broad strokes.

I suggest we all be as kind and respectful to each other as we can be with as long or as short a time as we have left before it kicks off…

That’s the nice part of this post over; for a little controversy I’m going to tag on at the end- I hope if it does have to go nuclear that someone saves a 30kt’r for vatican City

Lolz

Peace

a reply to: TritonTaranis

I didn't knew that Cologne is in East Berlin. You not only suck at logic but geographic too.

a reply to: TritonTaranis

Whatever, apparently people dont' understand how war works..

When a country is at war with another country and claims their land. They DO NOT HAVE TO RETURN SAID LAND.
It sucks but it's an actuality and fact about war..

US Land Claims victory of war

Georgia. Georgia, possessor of the weakest claim to western lands, held out the longest. The area that later became Alabama and Mississippi were given up in 1802,which completed the process of surrender.

I mean look at the history of Australia, they went to war with the natives there. Killed them in droves and took the land. Did they return said land? No.

So anyone who thinks land that is won during ANY war or attack should be returned is nothing more then a hypocrite.

Conquest of California

Mexican Cession

USA Independance Day

American Revolution, also called United States War of Independence or American Revolutionary War, (1775–83), insurrection by which 13 of Great Britain’s North American colonies won political independence and went on to form the United States of America.

Did we return the land to England? No, we won the war and created the US - so please get over yourself if you think RUSSIA should return the land to Ukraine that they legit won.

"Do as I say, not as I do" you guys starting to sound like the Democratic party just by thoughts alone. Nice to see their war brainwashing makes you agree with them. There are COUNTLESS more examples I could put, where land was won through war or genocide. Which Russia has NOT actually done to the civilians of Ukraine. But is technically 'within their right'. As far as conquest goes, and no it ain't a war crime to clean kill people.It is a war crime to torture, mutilate, genocide which the UKRAINIANS have proudly posted those torture video's of captives online.
Russia let MILLIONS leave Ukraine, there for by definition they can NOT perform a genocide. But our media has you brainwashed into thinking that they are apparently doing so.


Sad facts of reality, real wars are messy.

England vs Viking war back and forth land claiming for decades.

Battle of Basing

Here's a huge list of Brit wars only where land was claimed
www.britannica.com...
So do your damn homework.. and stop being a biased hypocrite.

In reality the war that is going on between Ukraine and Russia is equivalent to handing your enemy a black rose banquet. As 'messy' as it may appear, it's very mellow when you consider 2 things. Russia has been rebuilding area's they have claimed, and Russia could of easily just nuked the area before ALL THE PEOPLE LEFT. Making that area 100% unsafe for anyone to live. So Russia's actions have proven without a doubt that they are trying NOT TO KILL CIVILIANS. But # happens, it's a war.

Where was the outcry when OBAMA drone bombed a wedding killing men, women and children in a war that wasn't even in existence? On a 'guess' that someone 'might' be there. Which turned out was never even there to begin with, let alone related to anyone at said wedding.

harvardpolitics.com...

Let’s clarify: President Obama is not a pioneer of the illegal and offensive wars that the United States has engaged in during the last 20 years. Even still, he is an expansionist, reflected clearly in the development of his drone program. During his presidency, Obama approved the use of 563 drone strikes that killed approximately 3,797 people. In fact, Obama authorized 54 drone strikes alone in Pakistan during his first year in office. One of the first CIA drone strikes under President Obama was at a funeral, murdering as many as 41 Pakistani civilians. The following year, Obama led 128 CIA drone strikes in Pakistan that killed at least 89 civilians. Just two years into his presidency, it was clear that the “hope” that President Obama offered during his 2008 campaign could not escape U.S. imperialism.

ex·pan·sion·ist
[ikˈspan(t)SH(ə)nəst]
NOUN
a follower or advocate of a policy of territorial or economic expansion:
"he was an aggressive expansionist"
ADJECTIVE
relating to or characteristic of a policy of territorial or economic expansion:
"the imperial government became increasingly bent on expansionist policies"

So honestly, just stop it makes you look like an uneducated idiot to sit there and tout 'return the land to Ukraine'. No wonder why Putin has claimed that the 'communist' won and are in our political offices. They have the public brainwashed into thinking war is nothing more then a game. Turn off your COD and other wargames.. and open your damn eyes to see it's clearly a case of "UK and US governments can do whatever they want, and everyone else has to suffer for it."

You know it's bad when the morale(genocidal) KING China steps in and goes 'calm down'.

a reply to: TritonTaranis
"Let me Guess Comrade, you live in East Berlin lol"
Grow up, Hunter. And leave the Obama kids alone.

You can´t be more wrong about where i live in Germany. But could you do me one favor? Please tell me what made me a "comrade" with what i said in my comment? And is that all you have when your ideology and your bubble-reality is smashed with facts nobody can deny, calling other people stupid names like childs in a kindergarten?

Again, grow up and come back when you at least have two decades of life experience on your hump. No time to mess around with little brainwashed kids, the situation is too serious to waste time with little current thing supporters, YANKEE...

originally posted by: TDDAgain
a reply to: TritonTaranis
Correction:
Russia has not launched a "energy missile" at Europe. It was the European Union member states politicians as well as the US that wanted these energy sanctions.

It's dishonest to act like Russia is holding EU states hostage via energy, it's EU states politicians -not the people- that wanted no more Russian oil and gas. Don't let yourself be gaslighted about this!

This comment is only about that part, it's undeniable and no amount of goal post moving will change this fact.

Somewhat true. In Russia's aggressiveness we needed to stop buying from them since that would fuel their war, so yes it was a decision EU made, but it was made because of Russia's acts. So in the end was there really another choice?

a reply to: TritonTaranis

It was Europe with the pressure of both the US/UK officials that forced them to push through the sanctions. The scantions are hurting Eupore and it shows how dersapte the EU officals had becoming in their tough talks agaisnt Russia.

Despite the rising costs of electricity and high inflation rising in many Eurozone countries.

The same EU countries that first imposed the sanctions agaisnt Russia in the first place are the ones now facing.

-High rising inflation.
-Living costs rising, food prices are rising in among several EU countries which also imposed the sanctions agaisnt Russia and it shows how its backfiring.

Its almost winter.

a reply to: TritonTaranis

President Putin has decided on Russia's illegal annexation of the Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson.

The same EU, US had no issues of recognizing Kosovo's illegal indepence which was also supported by the UN. The same UN which had no issues in endorsing Israeli's illegal annexation of Syria's Golan Height.

global battle to protect the rules based international order

You are right we are ready to fight for the same New World Order, Based order which GW Bush's father spoke about at the UN.

Several years ago.

a reply to: KindraLabelle2

Do you think that would be a bad thing?

a reply to: DerBeobachter

What made you a "comrade"?

The tiniest hint you are somehow not 100% buying into his narrative makes you one.

a reply to: Xtrozero
I knew someone would try it with that twist and bend.

It's still dishonest to claim that Russia is weaponizing energy. It was the EU states and the USA gov that picked energy for sanctions. Said they don't want it.

When you claim that Russia weaponized energy supply against the EU, it's just not true. Takes a lot of bending the truth to say Russia is waging an energy war when it's the other side that choose that peril.

That is why a new Energy Union must be developed now, with a real common strategy. Because there is no alternative, if we want to guarantee security of supply, affordable prices, and the climate transition. Today, all of us, we must understand that we have entered a new world, where many of our points of reference have been turned upside down. We must face this situation with clarity.

Here it is, the foundation of the social credit score/ ESG & 'Great Reset' narrative.

Nothing insidious here, nothing at all. Just 'every citizen playing their part' (paying the ridiculous energy prices is our 'important role' in this matter, of course).

originally posted by: TDDAgain

It's still dishonest to claim that Russia is weaponizing energy. It was the EU states and the USA gov that picked energy for sanctions. Said they don't want it.

When you claim that Russia weaponized energy supply against the EU, it's just not true. Takes a lot of bending the truth to say Russia is waging an energy war when it's the other side that choose that peril.

So are you suggesting that Russia didn't used the fact that they provide EU its energy in their decision to invade in the first place? You don't think they looked at it and thought, boy we can take Ukraine because EU will be in a world of hurt if they get involved. So EU had only two choices here to not get involved and still buy Russian's energy, or get involved and not buy Russian's energy.

I didn't twist or bend anything as I said you were somewhat true in the fact that Russia didn't physically turn it off, well unless they blew up their own pipe line, but in forcing EU to decide it was about the same as them turning it off.

a reply to: Xtrozero

Of course they were aware of all that.

However the decision to not get gas and oil from Russia was solely made by the EU. Therefor it's dishonest to say that Russia "has sent an energy missle" or implying Russia is holding EU at hostage.

The EU cut itself loose, you can argue from any angle you want, that will not change that fact.

originally posted by: TDDAgain

Of course they were aware of all that.

However the decision to not get gas and oil from Russia was solely made by the EU. Therefor it's dishonest to say that Russia "has sent an energy missle" or implying Russia is holding EU at hostage.

The EU cut itself loose, you can argue from any angle you want, that will not change that fact.

I think you are over hyping all this. Russia was the invader and we need to not forget that or minimize it. Russia continually states total lies and you seem to get triggered over this one line out of a full speech. Russian's action were like dominos in all this and energy was one of those dominos. So you do not like the term "energy missile" then good for you, don't really care though.

It also seems you didn't know about this last year...

Russian energy giant Gazprom has drastically cut gas deliveries to Europe via the Nord Stream pipeline to about 20 percent of its capacity, German authorities said.

The Russian state-run company had announced Monday that it would reduce supply to 33 million cubic metres a day – half the amount it has been delivering since service resumed last week after 10 days of maintenance work.

Russia did cut gas supplies to EU down to 20% and is the one to gain the most from the NS1/2 sabotage, so you tell me...

a reply to: TritonTaranis

Charles Michael talks like a U.S. Democrat. Europe created their own problems with energy. They're probably knee deep in the "green" bullsh'it too.

Let them suffer enough and they will ignore Russia vs Ukraine, and focus 100% on becoming self-sustaining in all things....including the ability to fight Russia (or any other nation), if invaded.

Every nation in Europe should focus on doing what ITALY just did. Elect leaders who look out for their country first and foremost.

a reply to: Xtrozero

I think you are over hyping all this.

No I don't, I just state the unwashed truth.

Russia was the invader and we need to not forget that or minimize it.

True, agreed.

Russia continually states total lies and you seem to get triggered over this one line out of a full speech.

No, I am not triggered, I just uphold the truth and will not back down. If that's being "triggered" to you, I can not help you other than repeating that you are dishonest when you support the claim that Russia is using Energy to coerce or hurt the EU, when it was the EU that made this decision on their own.

Since you interjected yourself, you could not refute what I wrote, instead you argue from different angles and try put a spin on it.

Russia did cut gas supplies to EU down to 20% and is the one to gain the most from the NS1/2 sabotage, so you tell me...

Did they break a contract by doing that? Do your research and try answering that question to me.

Listen, I am not partisan about this, what I just don't like is being partisan hack like you and try shaping the narrative like you and your pal do about how Russia did this and that, when it isn't the truth.

is the one to gain the most from the NS1/2 sabotage, so you tell me...

Explain what they gain. I keep reading this but not one that claimed this has explained what they gain. People that are arguing from your point of view are getting a chuckle how Russia loosens millions a day yet when it fits the narrative, they gain something out of it? What do they gain, explain.

originally posted by: TDDAgain
Did they break a contract by doing that? Do your research and try answering that question to me.

Germany reported they cut back to 20% with no reason other than the war. That is physically less gas going to EU, pretty simple...

partisan hack

I said not a single thing incorrect...

Explain what they gain. I keep reading this but not one that claimed this has explained what they gain.

Were you the one that said "Do your research and try answering that question to me" well....

a reply to: Xtrozero

There was no war in 2021 when it was cut back. Try get your facts straight.