Ginni Thomas--Wife of Justice Clarence Thomas - Says Democrats Cheated Joe Biden into the Presidency

a reply to: keenmachine

She was the one for the past 2 years posting Q conspiracies and texting Q slogans in the released texts. She was a member of the Lifespring cult when she was a young adult, so it's easy to see that she could fall back into the cult mentality.

www.factcheck.org...
factcheck.org/2020/11/pennsylvania-tv-newscast-graphic-wasnt-evidence-of-voter-fraud/



You decide....

originally posted by: spacedoubt
She can “stand her ground” all she wants.
She got sucked into the Q cult, and pretends she never discusses these things with her supreme hubby.

It also appears that she was helping to orchestrate the illegal Jan 6 attempt to overthrow the govt.

At best, she is unreliable due to her adherence to the cult mentality. At worst, handcuffs and a jail cell.

And Clarence, dropped from the court, he cannot be unbiased.

No overthrow happened. Nothing but a riot went on. the votes were never in danger,as they had off site back ups/copies.
ANd just because she discussed it,unless it actually was done,its not a crime to just talk.
And ALL JUDGES are biased btw. A man an dwoman just because they are married are not liable for a crime the other commits if they do so and do not try to protect them.

originally posted by: FlyingFox

Phone numbers are not required as part of a voter record or as part of voter registration, but some municipalities may have required a phone number in their own voter registration systems prior to the creation of SVRS and WisVote.

The reality is that nearly all of those records referenced are Inactive Voter Records tied to voters who have been inactive for many years. The phone number in question is a city of Racine number that appeared in the Racine legacy system, a number that was entered as a default when a voter did not provide a phone number during registration.

It is unclear why the municipality, pre-2005, chose to have a phone number be a required field in their registration system, which required a default number to be entered if none was provided by the voter. There are 384 active voters in Racine who have this default phone number listed in WisVote. Those voters have not updated their phone number since the city assigned the default number prior to statewide voter registration being required after 2005. It should be noted that a phone number has no bearing on a voter’s eligibility. WEC staff have analyzed the data associated with the 384 active voters in WisVote that contain the default phone number and there is nothing else unusual about the records or other data fields in common.

Many voters do not provide a phone number during registration to avoid being contacted by campaigns and other organizations that purchase voter registration data from the WEC. So, it is likely that these remaining voters have had no reason to update their voter record since they originally registered and therefore the default number remains in place.

WI.gov

So this was just now an issue? Not at all since 2005? What about in 2016 when the state went for Trump?

originally posted by: FlyingFox
www.factcheck.org...
factcheck.org/2020/11/pennsylvania-tv-newscast-graphic-wasnt-evidence-of-voter-fraud/

You decide....

The fact check clearly states the graphic was wrong. You do know this occurs right? Often. I can't post images, but if we follow your logic then the Temps really were over 2000 degrees in these cities?

Or a graph is wrong in that case but of course is not wrong in this case?

Newscast Studio

a reply to: frogs453

Of course, the proven to lie to you and me "fact checkers" lied again. In fact, they are "fact scrubbers".


You have to be some kind of an idiot OR a real SHILL to believe we who are literally too numerous for you to count can't trust our own eyes on the night of the election.

You can live in fantasy land despite all the data you ignore all you want, but it is hurting you and your family. IF you even have one and are not a bot.

a reply to: frogs453
This guy reported dead too?

From your sources?

a reply to: frogs453
well the three things mentioned when trying to discredit someone is Q, Jan 6 and Russia. It's been in the playbook for years. I've seen it here at ATS for a while now. Though Q and Russia have lost their luster Jan 6 insurrectionist still going strong. Maybe it actually applies somehow somewhere but it's been used so often most tune out when hearing these overused talking points. As far as cult mentality it's all around you, vax, anti vax, pro life, pro choice those who support Trump, those who hate him with such a passion they would watch the world burn as long as he isn't president etc etc. Hard to find a candidate or anyone in politics who hasn't picked a side and became a member of one "cult" or the other.

a reply to: FlyingFox

Even the man on the corner handing out "end of the world" literature will be RIGHT, eventually.

Ginni Thomas is RIGHT TODAY, about Biden being cheated into the White House.

Over 50% of Americans Agree with her. (That belief matters as votes are cast.)

a reply to: keenmachine

"They" never point out that huge support of Q's statements being true, comes directly from the U.S. Congress.

Look: www.congress.gov...

If Congress takes the extraordinary step of condemning "disinformation/fiction" statements and people, they must be on to something HUGE.

Take a look at these qalerts.app... revelations, thoughts from Q, and you'll see why. EXACTLY WHY.

Think about it.

originally posted by: StarsInDust

The MAJORITY of Americans Now Believe Democrats CHEATED Joe Biden into the White House: www.westernjournal.com...
(And that percentage is increasing, as Biden continues demonstrating his unsuitability, and more Americans who voted for him, feel they were duped.)

Not just Americans are coming to believe that this election was stolen, but we have an entire world that is quickly coming to that conclusion. America has lost all respect with this illegitimate, senile president at the helm. Oh, how we have fallen in the eyes of the world, since the (legitimate) President Trump left Washington DC.

Seems to me they will let you vote if they can predict how you're voting and X amount of manipulation secures it. Thing is, I think Trump threw off their machine a bit too much. People denied liking him, but turned around and voted for him and it was down right shocking judging by their actions with social and Mainstream media. The illusion of democracy is important and I think everyone is so cynical now that it's almost beyond repair. We need a nuclear level event to shake us up enough to come together as a nation again before we self destruct. Brandon is just the guy.

a reply to: Paschar0

Seems to me they will let you vote if they can predict how you're voting and X amount of manipulation secures it. Thing is, I think Trump threw off their machine a bit too much. People denied liking him, but turned around and voted for him and it was down right shocking judging by their actions with social and Mainstream media. The illusion of democracy is important and I think everyone is so cynical now that it's almost beyond repair. We need a nuclear level event to shake us up enough to come together as a nation again before we self destruct. Brandon is just the guy.

Well, I kind-of disagree with you on a needed nuclear event. With psychopaths running this ding-dang planet. They will just view one nuclear event as a way to one-up one another. This planet will end up cracking in half, denigrating into dust and becoming a rock field orbiting round the sun.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: keenmachine

She was the one for the past 2 years posting Q conspiracies and texting Q slogans in the released texts. She was a member of the Lifespring cult when she was a young adult, so it's easy to see that she could fall back into the cult mentality.

That doesn't mean she is in any way wrong about what she stated in this case. Most everyone already knows it is true, so it's actually irrelevant what she said anyways. Nobody needs confirmation that democrats helped cheat him in. What is needed is ACTION to make sure they can't do it next time, and severe prosecution for what was already done.

outlawing dissent is not a substitute for a functioning and auditable election process. it's obvious why they wanted mail-in and absentee ballots to be expanded. It's dumb that they set the deadline for them to be after the election so that they don't have to report those tallies on election day (by design, obvs). Same day results should be the expectation. this trick the media participated in during the 2020 cycle of changing that expectation ahead of election night declaring that nobody would know results on election night even if it showed Trump was well in the lead was a transparent playbook communication, not a prediction.

It was sadly amusing to see in the primary cycle that the closely contested primaries in Pennsylvania were preceded by an article in the Inquirer (big liberal newspaper in philly) informing people that election results could be tabulated that same night but not to get the impression that's "normal" and it would certainly change for the general eleciton. turned out it took over a month to tabulate those numbers anyway because as you know the mathematical principal that dictates that the smaller the margin between two tallies the more difficult and time-consuming it is to count.

November 11, 2022 (God Bless Our Veterans and Military Personnel)

A Reminder/Refresher for some of you. First Time Info for others...

After President Trump pardoned prolific Democrat "cheater", former IL Governor Rod Blagojevich, he told President Trump point blank, Democrats Cheat as surely as they breathe. It's simply what they do...with no guilt or remorse.

Good Article Describing how CHEATING IS TRADITION for Democrats: www.breitbart.com...

Which is why Donald Trump has said at each of his rallies this year...Democrats will Cheat, and best way to make their fraud ineffective, is through massive Republican turnout. Voter turnout that cheating/fraud can't overcome.

It will be interesting to compare Democrat Turnout against Republican turnout for the 2022 midterms.