It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Hecate666
Are there ever any autopsies done?
Are they done by non brainwashed people?
Nobody is allowed to do an in depth inquiry with the jabs in mind. And if one of them would, they'd be cancelled and shot down as bitchute nutters instantly.
If there wasn't an agenda it would be a worldwide priority to establish if this jab in particular is at fault.
originally posted by: angelchemuel
I have started to lose count now as to how many people I personally know that have told me of friends of theirs who had been 5 years clear of cancer or maybe less and suddenly it has come back aggressively and treatment is not going well or they have died. One such case was just yesterday told to me by one of my clients.
We are only just starting.......
Rainbows
Jane
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
originally posted by: Hecate666
Are there ever any autopsies done?
Are they done by non brainwashed people?
Nobody is allowed to do an in depth inquiry with the jabs in mind. And if one of them would, they'd be cancelled and shot down as bitchute nutters instantly.
If there wasn't an agenda it would be a worldwide priority to establish if this jab in particular is at fault.
Try explaining that to hardcore adherents of "The Science", explain how healthy young people have and will continue to die, and they just default back to "vax good" with utterly no comprehension of the bigger picture.
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: anonentity
I happen to be familiar with the data source they're using at the start and presumably throughout the video.
It would be comical to get our resident science experts to even explain how he gets this data and a comedy of epic proportions for them to offer a cogent debunking. They can't even explain their way around the logic of not giving kids harmful therapeutics when they're at no risk of harm from COVID.
They've been trying to discredit this work. If this work isn't valid then I have some really bad news for fans of the climate crisis models. They're a lot more complicated and use far more assumptions in the absence of evidence than Ethical Skeptic does.
We have sworn testimony that COVID was funded by Fauci, we have public statements from multiple officials they lied about vaccines, the CDC admits to failing to track sentinel data as they claimed, we have government colluding with tech to censor protected speech as disinformation while they knew it was true. Fauci excluded the former director of the CDC because he disagreed with them, they rejected data on early treatment to further push an untested vaccine through emergency use free of any liability, and they tried to force everybody to take a potentially dangerous experimental drug to retain their basic human rights.
This is a crime against humanity. Now somebody will come in, ignore two years of fraud, lies, illegality, human rights violations, dead kids, and say "Bitchute Putin shill"!
The absolute state of "The Science" and it's acolytes.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: anonentity
My brother is proud to be fully vaccinated and boosted. Two weeks ago his food stopped passing through his body. No bowl movements. It turns out that cancerous growths had formed and grown to the point of choking off his intestines. He's wasting away and can only take in liquids. Very sad.
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
The sad thing is that the average "Joe" thats pushing this hasnt a clue whats really going on.It must just be top management handing out the orders. I would like to know who has been exempted from the Jab, and who hasn't but gets the saline shot. Their would have to be record code on the batch numbers.At some stage the legals of this is going to get hot.If they dont people will just take the law into their own hands.
originally posted by: MaxxAction
a reply to: carewemust
Man that's brutal...
are they treating him? Or is it beyond the point where they can?