Former DNI John Ratcliffe Suspects Documents Seized by the FBI From Trump Show FBI Crimes.

3.11.2023

SPEAKING OF FBI CRIMES...

Director Wray Brags the FBI Broke the Law 84% Fewer Times Last Year – Rep Darin LaHood Outlines Personal Targeting by FBI Analysts Unlawfully Searching NSA Databases

Representative LaHood is leading an internal congressional review of the FISA “702” reauthorization.

During the testimony, LaHood waxes philosophically about the importance of FISA-702 targeting as a tool for the FBI while simultaneously outlining how the FBI is weaponizing the tool.

At 06:24 of the video below, LaHood goes on to outline the details of the NSA noncompliance report showing how the FBI intentionally targeted him, likely because he is leading the 702 reauthorization group.

The irony here is thick. The FBI illegally uses 702 search queries, and in the example of LaHood, it is demonstrable targeting because the search query was only for his name, so there can be no claim of “inadvertent” search result.

Simultaneously, FBI Director Chris Wray states the number of illegal FBI searches of the database is 84% improved year-over-year.

In essence, the FBI is saying they are breaking the law 84% fewer times!

More at: theconservativetreehouse.com... onal-targeting-by-fbi-analysts-unlawfully-searching-nsa-databases/

The "DEEP STATE" feels they can do what they wish, and are accountable to NO ONE.

Donald Trump 3.4.2023: As President again, I will "Obliterate the Deep State".

originally posted by: carewemust
Sunday, September 18, 2022

Because former Director of National Intelligence (and former Congressman) JOHN RATCLIFFE has shared other "insider" information that prior DNI's would never reveal/discuss, it's logical to make the assumption he's being brutally truthful and honest about the documents taken from former President Trumps home by the FBI on 8.8.2022, as well.

Former DNI John Ratcliffe delivered VERY INSIGHTFUL information during an interview with Fox Business's Maria Bartiromo this morning. Here's an analysis of part of the interview, from CTH journalist "Sundance".

In this lengthy interview of John Ratcliffe by Maria Bartiromo, the former Director of National Intelligence, the man who has likely seen every document that may have eventually ended up in Mar-a-Lago, is challenging the nature of the classified status of those documents.

Ratcliffe does not believe the Mar-a-Lago documents are true national security documents, but rather documents that outline fraudulent ‘sources and methods’ used by the DOJ/FBI in their Trump targeting operation.

Keep in mind that as the DNI during 2020, Ratcliffe saw the documents that eventually became the material President Trump declassified and left with the DOJ to release after the Durham investigation was complete.

If Ratcliffe’s suspicions are correct, the entire construct of the DOJ-NSD operation to retrieve those documents from Mar-a-Lago is factually one big cover-up operation.

The interview, and more, at: theconservativetreehouse.com... /#more-237828

According to the Department of Justice, if revealed, the content of these documents would open a Pandora's Box that exposes our nation to "Irreparable Harm". And not even Special Master, Judge Raymond Dearie should see them!

Source: www.cnbc.com...

Maybe it would be irreparably harmful to the country, if Americans were to learn all the players involved in the multi-year plot to sabotage candidate Donald Trump, President-elect Donald Trump, and then, even Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America?

One thing for sure is that key people in what President Obama bragged about as his "Scandal Free" administration, will have to answer for crimes of Treason, if these formerly Tippy-Top-Secret documents turn out to be what former DNI John Ratcliffe, and other former Trump Admin officials, say they are.

-CareWeMust

May 19, 2023

TWO MYSTERYS

1.) The "GANG OF 8" Senators/House Members were allowed to see the Documents seized by the FBI from Trump, Biden, Pence.

This happened on April 11th: nypost.com...

Since then....SILENCE. What could it mean, that not even the News Media has clamed up on this subject, after their Congressional contacts (leakers) told them what they saw?

2.) The same with the 40,000 hours of Jan 6th video. Tucker Carlson showed a little bit of it. Now, none of the media outlets are clamoring for it an longer from House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, and Tucker Carlson has not said when he'll show more.

WHAT's GOING ON

The Trump indictment over these documents was desired and planned.

Turned out perfect.

justthenews.com...

Now it's Joe Biden's turn to explain why he stole and hoarded classified documents for over 12 years.

The reports I'm hearing are that the "classified nuclear secrets" are actually the details of Obama's deal with Iran, which the Dems are deperate to keep secret. No doubt because the deal was flagrantly illegal.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
The reports I'm hearing are that the "classified nuclear secrets" are actually the details of Obama's deal with Iran, which the Dems are deperate to keep secret. No doubt because the deal was flagrantly illegal.

I'm waiting for Military Times to report on this.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

True, and also the letter from Kim jong-un is detailing corruption offered to his country by the Barack Obama administration.

Barack Obama is the last Democrat left who supposedly has Sterling integrity.

I expect just before his presidential library is opened in Chicago later this year, all hell will break loose.

originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
The reports I'm hearing are that the "classified nuclear secrets" are actually the details of Obama's deal with Iran, which the Dems are deperate to keep secret. No doubt because the deal was flagrantly illegal.

That is interesting

Sunshine is the best disinfect

I believe the department of Justice would not allow judge Aileen Cannon to see these documents last fall.

I wonder will they try to prevent her from seeing them now that she will be the Trump trial judge?

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

All of the documents are from when Trump was in office.

a reply to: carewemust

You can believe whatever you want. CIPA allows the judge and jury to see all documents included in the indictment. If the classifying agency didn't want a document to be seen it wouldn't have been included in the indictment.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Good call.

Between Operation Crossfire Hurricane and Obama's Iran deal, that could EASILY cover 31 documents and provide incentive for the FBI to conduct this entire witchhunt and coverup.

an reply to: Threadbare

And you know this how?

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Link

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

The indictment includes the documents' dates.

If you people would just read the indictment it would save us a lot of time.

a reply to: Threadbare

Save....US? You are funny.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

A thought though. If you look at the information it is all things that would be found in his PDB. He was notorious for wanting a brief and not just the information.

Starts on page 28.

Linkn

a reply to: Threadbare

And a number of documents are undated.

If you people would just read the indictment.....

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

And what of those undated documents found like they pertain to the Iranian nuclear deal, CFH, or any other scenario being dreamed up in this thread?

a reply to: Threadbare

Most of the documents pertain to foreign capablilities.

Probably classified because of HUMINT and not any other reason at all.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

That wasn't my question. Which of those undated documents sound like they pertain to any of the topics certain users are throwing around in this thread?

By the way, you seem kind of flippant about Trump potentially giving up HUMINT, putting lives in danger.