UFO frenzy over Kyiv

a reply to: peaceinoutz

Thanks for the vote of confidence. I'm definitely working towards self-publishing. My idea is I am writing the book in two parts: one worded for the average reader, and an appendix that provides journal-level proof. Got some money squirreled back for ISBN numbers and LoC numbers, too. Once it's completed, I will be going whole-hog.

Let's just say our understanding of propulsion and gravitational fields is incomplete, as Newton's Laws of Motion were finally proved incomplete. Einstein made the initial proposals, but the concepts he introduced go far beyond where he stopped. And it explains UFOs... UFOs are simply an application of advanced physical laws we are not taught.

But don't expect anything soon... the math is atrocious and I will not publish until I can prove mathematically what I am stating. I get closer every year, but I still am not there.

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

How is your book going to be different from this book…

Einstein Was Wrong!: But So Was Newton 2015
by Martin O. Cook (Author)

Amazon description:

…….”[Note: The most complete version of the big picture that eluded Einstein in his attempts to unveil a unified field theory can be found in the book, The Gravity Cycle, by the same author as this book. This book, Einstein Was Wrong!, was one of many approaches to the ideas that will shake the very foundations of physical science upon which we presently stand.] Modern Physics is built on an erroneous foundation. If we are to take physics to a new level where gravity can be explained from an atomic/quantum perspective, then someone must boldly say, "Einstein was wrong, but so was Newton." Because they both started with the same wrong premise, their theories of gravity were destined to fall short in any attempt to connect them to atomic/quantum processes. And the same false premise that stifled Einstein in his ability to connect "the movement of planets and stars with the tiniest subatomic particles" prevents modern physicists from explaining the fourth and final force from an atomic/quantum perspective. Alas, "...when one starts with a wrong premise, no amount of patching can right the problem." But all is not lost. By correcting Newton's mistake (the wrong premise), a new foundation for understanding the role of the atom in the momentum, relativity, and gravity of masses emerges in the form of two new theories: The Atomic Model of Motion (AMM) and The Galaxy Gravity Cycle (GGC). These two theories combine to paint the big picture of how atomic/quantum processes are involved in holding a galaxy together, keeping planets orbiting stars, and preventing people from floating off into space. This book is dedicated to Occam's razor.”……

Or

Newton's Mistake: Why Gravity Remains a Mystery Paperback – May 28, 2012 by Martin O. Cook (Author)

Amazon Description:

……”[Note: The most complete version of the big picture that eluded Einstein in his attempts to unveil a unified field theory can be found in the book, The Gravity Cycle, by the same author as this book. This book, Newton's Mistake, was one of many approaches to the ideas that will shake the very foundations of physical science upon which we presently stand.] What is the difference between an object at rest and an object in motion? Nothing. When Newton declared that an object in motion tends to stay in motion, he failed to realize that this law applied to all objects, even objects that appear to be at rest on the earth’s surface. This crucial misconception is why he couldn’t explain how gravity really works. This set the precedence for the next several centuries that mass just mysteriously moves through space with no accountable science explaining changes in speed or direction. The Motion Myth paradigm, the unchallenged assumption that objects just mysteriously move through space, has been passed down to us and is the main reason scientists, including Einstein, failed to actualize the role of quantum physics in the motion of mass through space. By understanding the motion myth and replacing it with a quantum model of motion, we can explain for the first time how gravity really works.”……..

Just curious if what you have to reveal, brings new to the table something else that is different from what’s already been written…

The below…..is a statement Ben Rich used while ending his presentations ….. sometimes it was modified for the type of audience he was speaking to…..

Source: UFO accounts are journalists' stuff of dreams

……”"We now have technology to take ET home. No it won't take someone's lifetime to do it. There is an error in the equations. We know what it is. We now have the capability to travel to the stars. First, you have to understand that we will not get to the stars using chemical propulsion. Second, we have to devise a new propulsion technology. What we have to do is find out where Einstein went wrong."……

What I’ve highlighted shows that it’s already preconceived that Einstein’s equations has problems. Who’s to say that the error hasn’t already been corrected and already in practice now?

👽

Why Kiev and not Moscow? Are there nukes in Kiev pointed someplace with people with twitchy button pushers? Or is Kiev under direct cross hairs about to be annihilated? If this is true, than there has to be a reason.

a reply to: Q33323

i saw something in Afghanistan at night via my nigh vision I'm sure was a drone but man was it moving.

a reply to: Ophiuchus1

This guy must be really smart! He’s got Newton and Einstein with dunce caps on!
I'll go on Amazon and check him out.

a reply to: TheRedneck

I understand your caution. And it's good to want the evidence.

Self-publishing is relatively easy aside from the at least grand to edit it and proofread the MS professionally and paying the price for the self-publishing unless you go to Amazon or one of the free publishing places, and that’s a low-end price, but it’s the marketing aspect and the graphics for the appearance of the book that will cost extra. Let alone if you try to get it published by a traditional publisher---a real pain in the neck, time-consuming and frustrating.

Anyway, that aside. I didn’t think you were coming from a scientific perspective, which is certainly on another level than the sometimes questionable evidence-based milieu of conspiratorial ufology.

A book mm turned me on to, I’m actually re-reading now; you may know of it is called X-Descending has an interesting take on that side of the equation and gets into the famed Bennewitz story, as well.

Now that we and ze Russians have supersonic aircraft, this could very easily be us or them, vice Aliens.

Unfortunately for us, vs Aliens, our craft can only go in one direction at supersonic speeds. Whilst the Aliens can zig zag at supersonic + speeds. So we are still vastly outclassed.

Give us another 50 years, we'll be able to shoot one down.

a reply to: 38181

It would be most awesome if it is the case that the aliens are on the side of the country that has the morally higher ground in the conflict, which certainly history will prove to be the case anyway. Sure, it could be something else entirely. Careful not to lapse into mere wishful thinking, of course.

But my guess is they are in fact nonhuman in origin. I doubt anyone known has anything that moves that fast.

a reply to: ufoorbhunter

Nobody can be ruled out until we know who or what they are.

Personally after 25 years of obsession with the UFO question I suspect that most if not all theories are correct - They are ancient humans living underground, under oceans and underground on the moon and Mars , they are also aliens traversing our solar system and other systems, they are extra dimensional entities occasionally popping into our realm of observation.


And they are also US and other countries most secret weapon and observation platforms which are collectively kept absolutely secret from the public because knowledge of these projects would undermine the current energy slave system we all live under and which dictates every action we take.

Check this article out from the 50's talking about how leading aviation giants were on the cusp of rolling out gravity engines to the public, after discovering a particle responsible for gravity back then - hence why the US collider was shut down after being near complete. link

Nick Cook put my onto this article, the author of "The Hunt for Zero Point" and the former aviation editor for Jane's Defense Weekly.

He reached out to sources in one of the companies listed in the article, and a person who had worked on the project allegedly got scared and demanded not to be approached again.

He mentions this in his "The origin's of the hunt for zero point" video on his YouTube channel.

Another thing to point out is that Russia has alluded to having very advanced secret technology, as has the US, and there was the Chelyabinsk meteor which seemingly was taken apart by a separate and independent object, who else would do that but the Russians or possibly aliens/secret civilization?

Check out the link I shared and tell me the US and others couldn't have this technology?a reply to: Plunkenstein