Idaho Is Offering ‘Porn Literacy’ to Small Children

Another wonderful story of an Planned Parenthood affiliated organization which sucks government money to educate our children on "Porn Literacy". If that is not bad enough, they promote all the other crap along with it. They want to bring this to the elementary schools. 3rd graders? Really?

Our kids and grandkids are screwed. I


redstate.com...

However, the nonprofit “delivers a variety of approaches, including an ‘LGBTQ Inclusive’ curriculum” and “advocates for teaching elementary students about ‘porn literacy,’ which involves instruction on ‘kink and power, pleasure, sexual identity, sexual acts, and sexual exploration in relation to pornography.”

Indeed, ETR designates porn literacy as a “required topic” in sex education.

According to a video published by the Idaho Freedom Foundation, “trainers believe third grade students benefit from porn” and notes that some of the activities “include students watching cartoon porn.” Even more disturbing is that on its website, Idaho’s government teaches “students how to hide porn browsing from parents.”

idahofreedom.org...

Idaho’s Department of Health and Welfare (IDHW) implements sex education curriculum endorsed by Planned Parenthood in schools. The curriculum and training for sex education facilitators is purchased from an interest group that promotes queering education and normalizing the consumption of pornography.

Idaho law requires sex education taught in public schools to reinforce traditional family arrangements. IDHW promotes what Idaho law prohibits, however. IDHW takes funds from federal programs like the Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) and Title V Sexual Risk Avoidance Education (SRAE). Then, IDHW acquires sex education products from non-profits like Education, Training and Research (ETR), whose curriculum is developed and endorsed by Planned Parenthood.

A RTR curriculum link on the health district’s website directs viewers and teachers to ETR’s trainings on Porn Literacy and Queering Sex Ed.

The North Central Health District’s website directs teens to several other resources endorsed by this government-financed interest group. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy link takes kids to Power to Decide, showing kids where to get an abortion. Another link provided by the district is Love is Respect, which introduces kids to topics like polyamory and gender transitions. The Sex etc. link takes students to articles such as Transgender Men Can Get Pregnant, Too, surveys about masturbation, and AMAZE Org videos featuring cartoon depictions of porn and abortion.

twitter.com...

if its the comic with lesbian terrorist its been posted i d check but i feel like death rn

Being an Idaho redneck, it was apparent from early on the Governor Little was far too liberal. The upper panhandle and the Boise area are quickly turning blue, and that's where the majority of the population lies.

We have a lot of forested area with few inhabitants, and a lot of farm land with few inhabitants, so the state is doomed to be ruled by the will of big city folks going forward.

Ffs 😡

These are the only threads that genuinely fk up my feelz.

It's out of my control (external) I must be more stoic!

Thanks for exposing though 👍🏼

a reply to: infolurker

No man. Wtf is wrong with people?

I just want to know why they feel like the age is appropriate. It is like some screwed up grooming process. But for what. These children are just starting to understand abstract concepts at third grade. So they are waiting for early childhood to end but why? I am wanting to know the agenda behind this. It has to be more that the government is just a bunch of sick humans. What is the drive?

BTW I am beginning to think I will end teaching and just start working at fast food next year when it gets to $22 an hour in CA. Only a dollar less than what I make now. I am finding that I can not agree to feed kids the crap that they are teaching me to teach them in school.... perhaps a private school or something....I do not want to be part of destroying children's sence of self.

At what point did we stop protecting children? I seriously want to know. Because not that long ago child protection would be involved if there was even a hint that you were exposing your children to any type of sexually explicit talk / acts. Where are they now? What is their stance on all of this? Where is the line drawn between Uncle So and So is a just a minor attracted person teaching little niece about birds and the bees so he gets a free pass, or he's a sick minded pedo that should be, and used to be, locked away from society. Do they even screen those who work with or volunteer with children anymore for past transgressions or accusations? I'm just dumbfounded by all this nonsense.

Sounds like it's time to defund your public schools.

Send that money to private schools instead.

Time for citizens arrests. Grow a pair and protect these children.

And I still wonder why people send their children to public schools,

There is a reason CSA (child sexual abuse) is being taught in our schools. Listed you will find some of the emotional repercussions CSA causes.
From Wiki:

Child sexual abuse can result in both short-term and long-term harm, including psychopathology in later life.[14][26] Indicators and effects include depression,[9][27][28] anxiety,[11] eating disorders,[29] poor self-esteem,[29] somatization,[28] sleep disturbances,[30][31] and dissociative and anxiety disorders including post-traumatic stress disorder.[10][32]

A study funded by the USA National Institute of Drug Abuse found that "Among more than 1,400 adult females, childhood sexual abuse was associated with increased likelihood of drug dependence, alcohol dependence, and psychiatric disorders. The associations are expressed as odds ratios: for example, women who experienced nongenital sexual abuse in childhood were 2.83 times more likely to develop drug dependence as adults than were women who were not abused."[41]
A well-documented, long-term negative effect is repeated or additional victimization in adolescence and adulthood.[13][42] A causal relationship has been found between childhood sexual abuse and various adult psychopathologies, including crime and suicide,[18][43][44][45][46][47] in addition to alcoholism and drug abuse.[41][42][48] Males who were sexually abused as children more frequently appear in the criminal justice system than in a clinical mental health setting.[33] A study comparing middle-aged women who were abused as children with non-abused counterparts found significantly higher health care costs for the former.[28][49] Intergenerational effects have been noted, with the children of victims of child sexual abuse exhibiting more conduct problems, peer problems, and emotional problems than their peers.[50]

Sexualization of a child fractures their personality, much like MK Ultra victims.

Outcomes of sexual abuse
By far the most common effect of sexual abuse is post-traumatic stress disorder. Symptoms can extend far into adulthood and can include withdrawn behavior, reenactment of the traumatic event, avoidance of circumstances that remind one of the event, and physiological hyper-reactivity.

Another legacy of sexual abuse is that children abused at any early age often become hyper-sexualized or sexually reactive. Issues with promiscuity and poor self-esteem are unfortunately common reactions to early sexual abuse.

Substance abuse is another common outcome of sexual abuse. In fact, according to the AAETS, “specialists in the addiction field (alcohol, drugs and eating disorders) estimate that up to 90 percent of their patients have a known history of some form of abuse.”

Let's face it; they're not 'grooming' children, they're sexually abusing our children and using the gov. funded educational system to do it. So, why would TPTB want to make the majority of society mentally and/or emotionally ill? I can think of only one reason that makes any sense.

The push to end 2A has gone on for decades with little progress, yet we all know that is a very high - if not number one priority - of TPTB. It's quite obvious that it's going to have to be done by stealth, deception and with the approval of the majority of citizens.

Consider 15-20 years from now what life is going to be like for the coming generation whose minds have been scrambled with information beyond their ability to understand and process. Lots of ADHD, anti-anxiety, ant-depression drugs; lots of mental health issues requiring professional counseling, and an increase in all types of criminal behavior.

What does that have to do with 2A? Glad you asked.
1) Red Flag laws. Once your 'things' are taken for 'safe keeping' you'll have to fight the system for a long to get them returned- if you're exonerated.
2) States have been working on 'little' laws to 'protect' citizens - such as barring ownership by anyone who has ever been on psychotropic drugs, ie Ritalin, anti-psychotics, been in psychiatric counseling, been charged (yet not convicted) of domestic abuse, violent crime ( bar fight, anyone?) association with any non-liberal 'terrorist' groups (MAGA), etc.

There are two things that result from CSA for the majority of victims: some turn to substances to help with their mental angst ( legal or illegal drugs) and others go from being victims to victimizing others. The trauma either finds a release, or gets numbed with drug and/or alcohol abuse.

I dare anyone to come up with a better reason why those presently in charge are deliberately trying to fracture and destroy the minds of our little children and create an entire generation of emotionally confused and mentally ill citizens.

Check these sites out

healthandwelfare.idaho.gov...

idahonews.com...

Both say that this is not true, the site reporting it was wrong.

I decided to check it out because it seemed so bizarre, yet totally what liberals would do to Kindergarten students since CA is teaching K-12 masturbation. Also, in some states, liberal school teachers/nurses, are helping little children "transition genders" using drugs without the knowledge or consent of parents and their districts or state have made this legal to do. So in this climate, and based on what liberals and leftists are currently doing to our littlest of children, it could have easily been true and I get why people would easily believe it.

However, it seems it is not true.

originally posted by: marg6043
And I still wonder why people send their children to public schools,

Truthfully? Schools are a cheap babysitter, and most parents pay little attention to what their kids are being indoctrinated with until it slaps them in the face.

There is only one way to deal with these people. If the law does nothing, then just wipe these evil monsters off the face of the planet, and leave no traces of their vile existences. Even if this isn't true in this instance, people like this still exist and are still doing these horrendous things to children. Where is the red line? If this happened in generations past, they would have been dealt with one way or another. But not now, we are too soft on the worst types of behaviour.

originally posted by: The2Billies
Check these sites out

healthandwelfare.idaho.gov...

idahonews.com...

Both say that this is not true, the site reporting it was wrong.

I decided to check it out because it seemed so bizarre, yet totally what liberals would do to Kindergarten students since CA is teaching K-12 masturbation. Also, in some states, liberal school teachers/nurses, are helping little children "transition genders" using drugs without the knowledge or consent of parents and their districts or state have made this legal to do. So in this climate, and based on what liberals and leftists are currently doing to our littlest of children, it could have easily been true and I get why people would easily believe it.

However, it seems it is not true.

Of course they are going to deny it. Nobody ever admits to this sort of thing because they know what will happen to them if they do. Just because someone says its not true, or are not even prosecuted, doesn't mean they are innocent. There many nonces walking about having got away with their crimes scot free, because the law just simply does not work to protect the vulnerable from the worst predators. It is there to enable and protect them.

a reply to: nugget1

Trust me this is all about making money for corporate American specially big pharma and the medical system, to the point that eventually it will be mandatory medications for citizens or else they will not be able to work, buy food or have shelter.

Now bill Gates is getting into the schools system in liberal states with the clima change scam, next will be big pharma teaching our next generation what drugs are best for them.

a reply to: infolurker

Our kids and grandkids are screwed.

You should see our woodshop teacher! 💕Loves wood work...
Video Link 👉 twitter.com...

originally posted by: AccessDenied
At what point did we stop protecting children? I seriously want to know. Because not that long ago child protection would be involved if there was even a hint that you were exposing your children to any type of sexually explicit talk / acts. Where are they now? What is their stance on all of this? Where is the line drawn between Uncle So and So is a just a minor attracted person teaching little niece about birds and the bees so he gets a free pass, or he's a sick minded pedo that should be, and used to be, locked away from society. Do they even screen those who work with or volunteer with children anymore for past transgressions or accusations? I'm just dumbfounded by all this nonsense.

Probably when everyone started blaming Millennials for everything wrong with the world.