It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
I don't think the railroad workers have nearly as much leverage as they think they do.
Compared to cars or trucks, automating trains is trivially simple. There is no steering as such, which eliminates at least 90% of the complexity, and everybody already expects to have to stay out of the train's way (because it's physically impossible to stop a train quickly).
originally posted by: Bluntone22
Several railroad worker unions are preparing to strike on Friday if demands are not addressed.
This is after the end of a 30 day cool off period from the last deadline.
What does this mean for you?
“ Around 40% of the nation’s long-distance trade is moved by rail, more than any other form of transportation. If the unions strike, more than 7,000 trains would be idled and the rail industry has estimated it would cost the economy up to $2 billion per day.”
“ “Idling all 7,000 long distance daily freight trains in the U.S. would require more than 460,000 additional long-haul trucks every day, which is not possible based on equipment availability and an existing shortage of 80,000 drivers,” said ATA President and CEO Chris Spear in the letter. “As such, any rail service disruption will create havoc in the supply chain and fuel inflationary pressures across the board.”
This could be ugly for the supply chain if this turns into an extended stoppage.
Lots of food and oil is moved by rail so this can definitely be more than receiving your Amazon packages later than expected.
www.cnbc.com...
ETA,,,
I should point out that the feds can step in and force the workers back to work and it has happened before.
The rail system moves coal, oil and grain so if it goes too long that could happen.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
ETA,,,
I should point out that the feds can step in and force the workers back to work and it has happened before.
The rail system moves coal, oil and grain so if it goes too long that could happen.
originally posted by: Montana
I have personal knowledge of four times in the past year a railroad has attempted to hire new conductors.
Each class had 25 openings. No class had more then 7 applicants. That's with a $5000 referral offer, and a $25000 hire bonus.
How toxic does a workplace have to be for that to happen?
Toxic enough that 30% of the workforce has quit in the last year.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
It's just been announced that the unions were able to negotiate a deal with the railroads. Strike averted.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
It's just been announced that the unions were able to negotiate a deal with the railroads. Strike averted.
Really?
The union people voted and agreed?
A verbal agreement between the two sides was reached at about 2:30 am ET according to sources, and the final hours were spent getting the details worked out.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
It's just been announced that the unions were able to negotiate a deal with the railroads. Strike averted.
Really?
The union people voted and agreed?
What resulted from the back and forth was a tentative agreement that will go to union members for a vote after a post-ratification cooling off period of several weeks.
originally posted by: frogs453
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
It's just been announced that the unions were able to negotiate a deal with the railroads. Strike averted.
Really?
The union people voted and agreed?
All the other sources are paywalled so had to use CNN so you could see it:
A verbal agreement between the two sides was reached at about 2:30 am ET according to sources, and the final hours were spent getting the details worked out.
CNN