Biden Regime Orders 171 Million Bivalent Covid Shots Based On Data From 8 Mice

Is there a tipping point where the government or public health agencies lie to you so many times that you stop trusting them? What would that number be? Do you trust their intentions to be noble? If not, then why do you continue to follow their advice? Eventually you have to take personal responsibility.

This is your opportunity to do your own research. Use BASIC DEDUCTIVE REASONING. Allow your brain to process things and use common sense.

The Biden admin just approved the purchase of 171 million "bivalent" Covid boosters because of a "successful" trial of 8 mice.

Now, do you:

1. Think this an adequate amount of testing, especially when the original Covid shots are still EUA?

2. Do you think with the current level of 95% natural immunity that Covid shots are necessasry, especially since oral drugs Paxlovid claim to be effective?

3. Just do whatever authorities tell you because their is no area in life where you can think for yourself unless its about what Netflix show to watch or what fast food to order?

Yes, on the basis of “increased response” to Omicron in eight mice, the Biden administration has ordered 171 million doses of the new Pfizer and Moderna boosters. Even had this vaccine been tested in humans and shown some efficacy against infection – like the primary series – there would be more than enough reason for caution and hesitation. The European Medicines Agency has warned against the potential adverse immunological effects of repeated boosting every four months. As Dr. Marty Makary from Johns Hopkins has noted, recent research shows a “reduced immune response against the Omicron strain among people previously infected who then received three Covid vaccine doses compared to a control group that previously had Covid and did not have multiple shots.”


It is just impossible to overstate the unconditional absurdity of the FDA and CDC decision. Not only is the booster merely available to the public (or most rationally, the greatest at-risk in nursing homes) but it is recommended by the state for everyone, including children and teenagers – those with least to gain and most to lose.


What reassurance can CDC officials give to those concerned with the most documented serious adverse event associated with mRNA vaccination?

CDC official Dr. Sara Oliver: “We know that the myocarditis risk is unknown but anticipate a similar risk to that seen after the monovalent vaccines.”

SOURCE

8 mice and 8 mice only were the test subjects. And out of those 8 identical lab mice there was a 73 times difference in the outcomes of the injections.

If you think this is ok then you are an idiot.

Well heck population control won't happen by itself.

"Mouse data"

🤡 🌎

We beat pharma! That's why we're buying 171 million new doses from them!

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Think this an adequate amount of testing, especially when the original Covid shots are still EUA?

Yes, it’s very adequate — if you don’t give a rats ass about the consequences.

a reply to: dashen
And ill bet 3 of them Mice were Blind



Pfizer isn’t sharing Covid vaccines with researchers for next-gen studies

If anybody still thinks these 'vaccines' are worth the risk they're beyond awakening.

'Peer pressure' to do something is always a huge red flag; if a product is so great you don't need to work as hard to sell it as governments have done with the C vaccine.

Sooner or later everybody will have to come to terms with what we've allowed to happen in the world. Ignorance is bliss.....until it isn't.

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Think this an adequate amount of testing, especially when the original Covid shots are still EUA?

Yes, it’s very adequate — if you don’t give a rats ass about the consequences.

"Rats ass" is that a pun?

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Think this an adequate amount of testing, especially when the original Covid shots are still EUA?

Yes, it’s very adequate — if you don’t give a rats ass about the consequences.

"Rats ass" is that a pun?

I was thinking mices ass. But that didn’t have the same ring to it.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

1. Think this an adequate amount of testing, especially when the original Covid shots are still EUA?

2. Do you think with the current level of 95% natural immunity that Covid shots are necessasry, especially since oral drugs Paxlovid claim to be effective?

This is not adequate. Most trials take years if not decades.

Paxlovid should be used INSTEAD of vaccines in my opinion. I personally used Paxlovid and had amazing results, I felt better in hours, seriously hours!!

You should see what Russell Brand has to say lol, worth a watch as it's not only pretty funny, but also on point.
Ivermectin is now listed by the NIH as effective against covid.

youtu.be...

Go figure 🙄

originally posted by: Albert999
You should see what Russell Brand has to say lol, worth a watch as it's not only pretty funny, but also on point.
Ivermectin is now listed by the NIH as effective against covid.

youtu.be...

Go figure 🙄

But I was told ivermectin was dangerous.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: Albert999
You should see what Russell Brand has to say lol, worth a watch as it's not only pretty funny, but also on point.
Ivermectin is now listed by the NIH as effective against covid.

youtu.be...

Go figure 🙄

But I was told ivermectin was dangerous.

IT WILL KILL YOU. AND PLEASE IGNORE THE NOBEL PRIZE IT WON!

Now come along and have some more untested drugs please.

😈

originally posted by: Albert999

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: Albert999
You should see what Russell Brand has to say lol, worth a watch as it's not only pretty funny, but also on point.
Ivermectin is now listed by the NIH as effective against covid.

youtu.be...

Go figure 🙄

But I was told ivermectin was dangerous.

IT WILL KILL YOU. AND PLEASE IGNORE THE NOBEL PRIZE IT WON!

Now come along and have some more untested drugs please.

😈

You're right, emergency use authorized experimental drugs are 100% safe and effective while tried and tested Nobel prize winning drugs the WHO has on their list of essential medicines are extremely dangerous.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: Albert999

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: Albert999
You should see what Russell Brand has to say lol, worth a watch as it's not only pretty funny, but also on point.
Ivermectin is now listed by the NIH as effective against covid.

youtu.be...

Go figure 🙄

But I was told ivermectin was dangerous.

IT WILL KILL YOU. AND PLEASE IGNORE THE NOBEL PRIZE IT WON!

Now come along and have some more untested drugs please.

😈

You're right, emergency use authorized experimental drugs are 100% safe and effective while tried and tested Nobel prize winning drugs the WHO has on their list of essential medicines are extremely dangerous.

You've nailed it! 👍🏼

On a side note, you noticed how all the (usual suspects) sheep are in full swing in other threads but not this one.
It's when they know they know they haven't got a leg to stand on. The regret still oozes out of them 😂

originally posted by: KKLOCO

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: KKLOCO
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Think this an adequate amount of testing, especially when the original Covid shots are still EUA?

Yes, it’s very adequate — if you don’t give a rats ass about the consequences.

"Rats ass" is that a pun?

I was thinking mices ass. But that didn’t have the same ring to it.

Each test mouse is more intelligent than anyone on the Biden Admin staff, except for perhaps the girly-man in charge of U.S. Health and Human Services. She knows how to keep his mouth shut.