Why so many magazines and articles removed as 'Classified' from Mar-a-Largo

originally posted by: JIMC5499
a reply to: Xcalibur254

How do we know what he had?

We don't.

We 'know' what democrats and fbi say that they have, but fbi and dems have zero credibility after fabricating so many Get Trump stories over the past 7 years.

fbi is damn sure fighting this special master tooth and nail though, for some reason they don't want anyone to know what these documents are, which leads me to believe that these are the J19 declass docs that dems pretend never happened plus a small number of exec priv docs where dems are shrieking that Trump can't claim after his term (which is pretty funny).

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: JinMI

During the execution of search warrant, investigators found more than double the number of classified documents as were turned over with the subpoena. How is that complying with the subpoena?

"Marked classified"

Get back to me when they were illegal.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: JinMI

During the execution of search warrant, investigators found more than double the number of classified documents as were turned over with the subpoena. How is that complying with the subpoena?

Because fbi and dems said so?

They have a serious credibility issue after 7 years of fabricating fake Trump accusations.

Hence the request for a special master to determine if democrats are just making it up again.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: JIMC5499

Did you not see the detailed inventory released the other day?

Sure. That's what they say that they found.

a reply to: JIMC5499

Trump's lawyers haven't denied it.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: JIMC5499

Trump's lawyers haven't denied it.

Do they have to?

It's fascinating to see so many left-leaning folks taking such a keen interest in...

Improper Handling of Sensitive Material zOMMMG

(Pearl Clutching commences)

It's amazing how 6-ish years ago this was a nothing burger???

It's already been stated in the thread, but to dispel and disabuse such an imbecilic idea...

"paper" IS NOT more secure/harder to track then "digital" copies.

With a terabyte external USB drive I could scan to high-resolution images, compress, encrypt every document Trump had at his residence, and then a whole lot more.

If a malicious person were to get box of those classified documents, they "won"...they have the info they're after (assuming the paper is in that box). If a malicious person instead grabs the external USB drive....congratulations, you have a paper weight that is full of indecipherable encrypted gibberish (unless you head over to NSA headquarters with drive in hand).

If Trump knowingly held onto documents past expiration of his security clearance and (this is the important part) AND AND he did so with malicious intent, to disseminate to those w/o security clearance, to sell it (laughable idea), to blackmail, then throw the book at him. I really don't care, if he goes to jail or not, although this process is proof positive that there are those (even on ATS) infected with TDS, and have a legitimate psychological ailment that simply won't allow them to move past the Trump presidency.

One last thing: IF Trump had malevolent designs (as above, blackmail, sale) to misuse any of the sensitive material, he would've done EXACTLY as Hillary Clinton did in 2016. She set a template for how to construct secretive, extra-legal digital infrastructure to hold and disseminate sensitive materials that she HAD NO LEGAL STANDING to possess and distribute in that manner. Then, when discovered, and (get this!) subpoenaed (GASP!) for her emails...her team systematically went about wiping ("ummm, you mean with a rag?" STFU Hillary, playing stupid is very unbecoming), digitally and physically destroying computer servers and smartphones, essentially ignoring the subpoena for that information.

Either you are a proponent of equal and consistent application of the law, or....you are a hypocrite. End of discussion.

So IMO, if improperly storing/mishandling classified material is truly a crime...lock both Hillary AND Trump up for it. Easy peasy.

If instead this is a crime in name only, and no legal consequences fall out of it, as was the case with both Hillary's email server and Humah Abadeen's placement of sensitive docs on her pedo husband's laptop, then STFU, and move on. Otherwise it's just another transparent and obvious Trump smear job.

At this point you TDS folks have taken an overall hard to like, unsympathetic figure like Trump, and have put him on the road to martyrhood with the FISA debacle and now what's looking like a paper retread of 2016 Hillary emailgate. You are engaging in this endeavor as you have been programmed to, by MSM, who in turn do so at the behest of the Deep State.

It's quite amazing that with a place like this, with a generally open minded and enlightened (or on the road to enlightment) user base, so many members have a complete lack of critical thinking,

Like the the member I heard propose that multi-millionaire Trump, already in some form of wealth and affluence, would engage in espionage to sell classified US documents to foreign parties.

Think long and hard for a moment, at how STUPID and unlikely that idea sounds. What motivation is there to do that, if Trump is already quite wealthy, and knowing he has a vast group of enemies looking for the slightest excuse to nail him to the wall, and that any such leak would be TRIVIALLY linked back to him? Again, a person whose interested in below the board information exchange would do EXACTLY what Hillary did.

Deny
Ignorance

Man. Some people reallllly have a lot of temperamental faith in the Feds.

I wonder what it's like to just believe whatever you're told by experts and authority.

Hell, it must be nice to do just whatever you want knowing your followers will support you no matter what and even do the mental gymnastics for you.

These guys didn’t lie previously to get a warrant on this same guy………

During campaign season………..

a reply to: shooterbrody


Twice.

Then publicly lied about it for months until the secret FISA court made it's first ever public announcement saying that democrats had repeatedly lied to get those Trump warrants.



Credibility.

The missing ingredient.

a reply to: MidnightWatcher
Plead guilty in court to lying to get a warrant against the administrations political rival………


Appears to be happening again, in a similar fashion.

originally posted by: StoutBroux
So I've been reading the list of items that were removed from Trump"s Mar-a-Largo location and I can't believe how many magazines and public articles were included in the confiscated items. Since when are publications to the public classified? Looking through the list, it all seems so ridiculous.

It is seriously a joke. Is that an oxymoron?

storage.courtlistener.com...

And former First Lady Melania Trump's intimate apparel too: www.businessinsider.com...

I bet these FBI perverts would take former First Lady Hillary Clinton's panties too.

THESE PEOPLE ARE SICK.