It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Notabot12345666
a reply to: carewemust
Wars were fought over less. I’m convinced they’ve got us all on hormone disrupters in the food or water to keep us docile.
originally posted by: rickymouse
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Notabot12345666
a reply to: carewemust
Wars were fought over less. I’m convinced they’ve got us all on hormone disrupters in the food or water to keep us docile.
Since everyone drinks water, that's probably where the hormone disrupters are infused. Very strong doses going to Germans and the French. I hear they can't turn their air conditioners on unless the temp reaches 100 degrees, and nobody's rioting!
Nah, just the fluoride. One part per million can cause problems with thinking over the years. It is not immediate action, it's effects can be hidden because it takes a lot longer for the symptoms to arise so people can't comprehend that it is the fluoride.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
truthaboutfluoride.com...
In 1999, the CDC declared the fluoridation of drinking water to be one of the 10 great public health achievements of the 20th century, alongside vaccines and the recognition that tobacco use was a health hazard.
FBI Admits Tilting the 2020 Election to Biden - How About a Trump v Biden Do-Over Nov 2022.
We know it's technically doable.
originally posted by: musicismagic
originally posted by: Notabot12345666
a reply to: carewemust
Wars were fought over less. I’m convinced they’ve got us all on hormone disrupters in the food or water to keep us docile.
You do know that Oreo cookies are made in china these days and sold everywhere.
Let's put one more race on the ballot in every state; Donald John Trump(R-challenger) against Joseph Robinette Biden(D-incumbent). We know it's technically doable
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Guyfriday
President Trump is certainly tackling the possibility!
More at: www.newsweek.com...
Former President Donald Trump says he is using new "conclusive" information regarding President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, and the FBI's alleged burying of an investigation into his laptop to challenge the 2020 election and call for a new, impromptu election entirely.
"So now it comes out, conclusively, that the FBI BURIED THE HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP STORY BEFORE THE ELECTION knowing that, if they didn't, 'Trump would have easily won the 2020 Presidential Election,'" the former president said Monday in a Truth Social post.
"This is massive FRAUD & ELECTION INTERFERENCE at a level never seen before in our Country!
REMEDY: Declare the rightful winner or, and this would be the minimal solution, declare the 2020 Election irreparably compromised, and have a new Election, immediately!"
As history and experience demonstrates, Donald Trump is NOT merely blowing smoke.
He WILL follow-through on this, if legally doable. And, TRUMP has the Resources and the backing tens of millions of America-First MAGA supporters behind him 110%....in addition to the tens of millions who are (wisely) against dementia-Joe staying in charge of our country.
originally posted by: cmdrkeenkid
a reply to: Notabot12345666
"Have you never wondered why I drink only distilled water or rainwater? And only pure grain alcohol?... A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice."
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Myself, not being a Constitutional scholar cannot recall ever hearing of any place in the US Constitution that would allow for this type of action. Will any experts on the Constitution who visits this thread please tell us where it says this can be done according to US law? I have no memory of this ever being raised in my history classes.
Anyone?
Can anyone explain what THIS means?
We know it's technically doable.
Does that just mean that technology is up to the task of doing it? Does it mean that the Constitution says it is technically doable?
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: carewemust
Government censorship is quite vile.
Using the fbi to accomplish such is tyrannical.
originally posted by: Roxstar
a reply to: carewemust
That would sure be awesome if a new election was held. And it wouldn't surprise me if Trudeau did the same thing at the same time. No doubt both the Dems of USA and Libs/Cons of Canada would attempt another rigging.
However, if it's a snap election, they may not get enough time to solidify the rigging and may lose.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: MykeNukem
Even though I do not agree with the premise, that's still one hell of a funny poster. Thanks for that Myke.