NASA delays Artemus mission..

Well no launch today... Bummer.
Engine coolant issue..

www.orlandosentinel.com...

Next launch window is Friday I think.

a reply to: Bluntone22

Better safe than sorry.

Maybe next time Shaun...

a reply to: gortex

So true.
Especially considering the next rocket will not be ready for launch for two more years.... Maybe.. it is NASA

So why are we still using huge massively expensive and inefficient chemically fueled rockets when we already know we have at the very least antigravity and reverse engineered crafts? Our own govt has admitted to this, as well as the fact that they have admitted that there are also craft that are non-terrestrial with even more unexplained capabilities.

Answer = Over budget black money slush funds for the actual real "black projects"

a reply to: panoz77

We are in short supply of pixie dust so we are stuck with liquid oxygen and hydrogen...

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: panoz77

We are in short supply of pixie dust so we are stuck with liquid oxygen and hydrogen...

So you actually think that over the past 60 years, we haven't advanced in propulsion from solid and liquid fuel rocket engines? OK, lol

a reply to: panoz77

Well let's say that we have possession of a crashed alien spaceship.
Believing that we would be capable of taking it apart and building our own version would be about as likely as giving a caveman a broken iphone and expecting him to build his own version.

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: panoz77

Well let's say that we have possession of a crashed alien spaceship.
Believing that we would be capable of taking it apart and building our own version would be about as likely as giving a caveman a broken iphone and expecting him to build his own version.

Haven't you heard? "They are real"
www.reuters.com...

originally posted by: panoz77

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: panoz77

Well let's say that we have possession of a crashed alien spaceship.
Believing that we would be capable of taking it apart and building our own version would be about as likely as giving a caveman a broken iphone and expecting him to build his own version.

Haven't you heard? "They are real"
www.reuters.com...

Bray did say that "we have no material, we have detected no emanations, within the UAP task force that would suggest it is anything non-terrestrial in origin."

originally posted by: Bluntone22

originally posted by: panoz77

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: panoz77

Well let's say that we have possession of a crashed alien spaceship.
Believing that we would be capable of taking it apart and building our own version would be about as likely as giving a caveman a broken iphone and expecting him to build his own version.

Haven't you heard? "They are real"
www.reuters.com...

Bray did say that "we have no material, we have detected no emanations, within the UAP task force that would suggest it is anything non-terrestrial in origin."

Right, so he is admitting we have "terrestrial" crafts that our own pilots say can outperform them by a 100x without any means of identifiable propulsion. But they are definitely real.

So again, if we currently have that terrestrial technology, why are we using solid and liquid rocket boosters?

a reply to: panoz77

Like I said above.
Even if we do actually have a craft sitting in a hanger somewhere that doesn't mean we are anywhere near understanding or replicating the technology.

originally posted by: panoz77
So again, if we currently have that terrestrial technology, why are we using solid and liquid rocket boosters?

If you have tech that’s far ahead of anything your adversaries have, and the future of the nation isn’t currently at stake, it’d make sense to keep the good stuff under wraps until you really need it.

Another Moon mission isn’t like, say, the race to end WWII.

a reply to: Bluntone22


Nasa is having problems with covid right now, and the lead animator got sick, pretty sure I watched this ad in my Bilderberg newspaper last week.

Hiring now, video & animation designer. We are looking for a outstanding animator to do some landscape designs, someone that got a flare for creating realistic landscapes depicting alien worlds also master level in green screen technology is needed. You will be given top secret clearance for lunar projects and you will be not speak of your work outside of the Hollywood facility.

originally posted by: panoz77

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: panoz77

We are in short supply of pixie dust so we are stuck with liquid oxygen and hydrogen...

So you actually think that over the past 60 years, we haven't advanced in propulsion from solid and liquid fuel rocket engines? OK, lol

If we have advanced our understanding of propulsion to something beyond Newtonian physics, the "new" physics making such technologies possible should be widely understood, and a matter of ongoing discussion in the scientific and technological communities: In essence, any physicist with a blackboard and a sufficient supply of chalk would be able to write out the necessary equation(s).

The laws of physics governing our Universe are written large and posted for all to see.

They cannot be hidden, though they may be reinterpreted from time to time.

a reply to: Bluntone22

Hydrogen leaks are not something to be trifled with so probably for the best.

$20 for me! Bet with my neighbor that it wouldn't lift off today!! $50 That if and when it lifts off it will never return.

Does anyone know a site where I can bet when/if we will get humans back on the moon?

Assuming we had such a craft that was both operational and capable of such a minor space flight. Why would we fire up that energy signature like a beacon to the universe for others to come check out what the Earth Monkeys put together?

Could we compete on local, galactic or universal scale with those that could detect such a craft? If you think of Star Trek as a guide, the Vulcans ignored us until we figured out the speed of light…(which seems to have been a dirty nuclear reaction rather than making a static warp bubble to squeeze between the folds of Newtonian space by controlled detonation of matter and anti-matter as the energy source that powered Warp technology and probably the ship itself in Star Trek).

originally posted by: cooperton
Does anyone know a site where I can bet when/if we will get humans back on the moon?

You can wager on anything here....

www.betonit.org
Of course there are still bookies that will let you bet on anything as well.

www.priceperhead.com...

Why bet on anything with such a future pay out? "For the nags, always bet the long shot when it rains".....ole whaaa


Topic.....We will never leave this solar system until we can work together on a global project. Thus never!!

Watched the prep' for the launch all morning from here in Great Britian, for NASA to pause the launch at T-40.00, was disappointed when it was scrubbed but better safe than sorry. Fingers crossed for friday!!