It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Decision
Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech
Updated 16 August 2022
The Public Assessment Report summarises the initial assessment at the time of approval in December 2020. The text in the original report remains unchanged.
Our advice is regularly updated on the basis of significant new data and our latest advice can be found in the Summary of Product Characteristics on this page and the Summary of Coronavirus Yellow Card reporting.
She linked to a report from December 2020 which said, "reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time", because of an absence of data and that, "women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated".
Part of the confusion appeared to stem from the fact that a different part of the same webpage had been updated on 16 August 2022, to include some information about boosters.
A link to the outdated report was viewed across major social media platforms thousands of times, along with inaccurate claims including that the government had performed a "U-turn" and admitted the vaccine was "not safe for pregnant or breastfeeding women".
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: Kurokage
What I think you are saying is, that it's not a fake report as such...the gov.uk had put it on their site by mistake by putting out an old version mixed with a new version?
It appears that confusion happened due to the fact that a different part of the same webpage had been updated on 16 August 2022, to include some information about boosters.
So there was confusion.......not a hoax.
originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: AaarghZombies
confused what you think you've debunked - there are new recommendations. Have a listen and follow the links.
.
Guidance
COVID-19 vaccination: women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
Information for women who are pregnant or breastfeeding on coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination.
From:
UK Health Security Agency
Published
6 December 2020
Last updated
2 September 2022 —
Pregnant women were first offered the vaccine in December 2020, if they were health or care workers or in an at risk group. Since April 2021, pregnant women have been offered the vaccine as part of the standard age based rollout of the vaccination programme.
www.reuters.com...
DECEMBER 3, 2020
This is misleading: the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), which advises the UK government, published a report on Dec. 3 saying it does not currently advise COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, and that only children at very high risk of exposure and serious outcomes should be offered vaccination (here).
“There are no data as yet on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy, either from human or animal studies. Given the lack of evidence, JCVI favours a precautionary approach, and does not currently advise COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy,” the report says.
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
Many who took the jab know they messed up but cannot admit it. Their fear and ignorance continues.
Mark Steyn is either one of these idiots or acting dumb. Either way it feeds the media the wrong message.
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
originally posted by: BigfootNZ
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
Many who took the jab know they messed up but cannot admit it. Their fear and ignorance continues.
Mark Steyn is either one of these idiots or acting dumb. Either way it feeds the media the wrong message.
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Ive had 2 jabs and the booster (along with 7 other family members and an equally large number of extended family)... me and all of them are still here alive and kicking (and we all range from late 20's right up to people in their 80's). Also where are the anti vaxx who vehemently said we'd all be dead by now if we took the vaccine? (There were people on this very site a year or more ago stating all those who took the vaxx would be dead by now)...
Im still here a year latter... or is that 'there will be consequences' gonna be pushed out further and further like most predictions in CT?
originally posted by: Ksihkehe
originally posted by: BigfootNZ
originally posted by: DeathSlayer
Many who took the jab know they messed up but cannot admit it. Their fear and ignorance continues.
Mark Steyn is either one of these idiots or acting dumb. Either way it feeds the media the wrong message.
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
Ive had 2 jabs and the booster (along with 7 other family members and an equally large number of extended family)... me and all of them are still here alive and kicking (and we all range from late 20's right up to people in their 80's). Also where are the anti vaxx who vehemently said we'd all be dead by now if we took the vaccine? (There were people on this very site a year or more ago stating all those who took the vaxx would be dead by now)...
Im still here a year latter... or is that 'there will be consequences' gonna be pushed out further and further like most predictions in CT?
The people that said you'd all be dead right now were alarmists before the data was even available. They don't even know what vaccine you took, did you take them seriously? Perhaps we should relegate them to the corn fields with the rest of the straw men?
The data now shows the immune therapeutic is very ineffective and doesn't last, which isn't that bad except it also has a high rate of severe adverse effects. That is bad and it's bad enough to have recorded an astonishing number of adverse events compared to other vaccines. Probably so many more because all previous vaccine disasters were pulled before they reached this level of stupidity or were never approved through the established criteria that was tossed in the toilet for COVID vaccines.
You took a vaccine for a disease that has a very low mortality. It only takes a very low mortality from the vaccine to render any benefit received a net loss versus adverse events. The data has shown regional variance in vaccine composition, with certain batches having different doses and having more or less adverse events. Just because you and yours are fine doesn't mean that's the case for everyone and the success or failure is in aggregate. It's called public health. Your personal health seems to be fine from COVID "vaccination", but you alone do not make up the public.
I'm amazed people don't see the inherent selfishness of saying "well I'm fine". It's not just about you. It's about just one kid dying for a vaccine that provides them zero clinical benefit for a disease they are incredibly unlikely to get seriously ill from. It's about people with known issues that could be exacerbated by the vaccine, but the authorities are refusing to give informed consent to them about the real risks.
A disease that has a sub 1% mortality does not merit any unknown risks from a "vaccine" that doesn't prevent transmission or illness and has to be repeated, particularly in healthy young people or nearly anybody healthy under 50. Each booster will have the same or greater risk of causing adverse events, it's simple science. You get no real protection, have to expose yourself to risks they refuse to even make an effort to properly track, and you will have to continue doing it because the "vaccine" substantially limits your ability to fight new variants. Now each variant will have an equally late and ineffective booster.
originally posted by: carewemust
2.27.2023
For those who remember MARK STEYN, he's been silent over the past several months, because of 2 (TWO!) Covid-19 VACCINE-INDUCED HEART ATTACKS.
Source: truthsocial.com...
What a tragedy.
Maybe the Covid-19 lab leak was an accident.
But the negative/adverse health events associated with the Pfizer Covid vaccine certainly isn't!
P.S. Congress knew: www.foxnews.com...
Lots of Pharmaceutical and Government indictments and lawsuits are needed!