Smoking Gun: Vascular And Organ Damage Induced By mRNA Vaccines: Irrefutable Proof Of Causality

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

You still take this as "irrefutable proof"?

Why do you keep insinuating that i said that? The term I've used is
indefensible and even at that I was referring to a much broader
scope so...Involving the whole fiasco especially what went on
with this Hannah Fry and the Peacock Feather.

What's gonna happen when they skirt out from under the argument.
The argument hat the vaccine isn't to blame so they can point the
finger at Trump. Or does that not make any sense to either?

There's a whole town in England freak out about the model they
were involved in and we to had to hear about from who another
quack doctor? Ha HA get real carp.

a reply to: Randyvine2

Mate, it's in the title of this thread?

Care to address the actual points that I made about this study?

The one referred to by the OP?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Mate, it's in the title of this thread?

I know it's in the title and what I didn't realize is that you'd be setting any
parameters for discussion. But you know what? I'd definitely trust them
in the midst of so much hokey crap on the table that the MSM narrative
keeps dodging and censoring. You're the one clinging to the hope you
haven't been betrayed by your cult like faith in science and lying
human beings.

I was smart enough not to put myself any where near even thinking
about submission. Cause unlike you I wasn't afeered of the fear
they was a push'n pun intended. So the dog in the fight belongs to
you. And I find your argument collectively based on
faith where I have none. As well as your blind decision completely
irresponsible. Further more trying to defend any of it to me is a
joke. But one that I don't find funny at all.

I have a friend at work who received the first shot. He broke out with red blotches that looked like posion ive. They lasted almost a year. The shots are not safe nor are the effective.

a reply to: Randyvine2

"You're the one clinging to the hope you
haven't been betrayed by your cult like faith in science and lying
human beings."

No. You are. Your cult like faith in someone that lies about their qualifications?

Talk about irony.....

a reply to: bluemooone2

How does somebody anybody grill me about whom I trust
with an alternative like Fauci? I'm having a hard time with
that IDk?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

No. You are. Your cult like faith in someone that lies about their qualifications?

What the hell? Why am I responding to you?

I know you are but you're more of it!

How could you oooouu That's a response OMG?

Carp you're come'n apart on me Mr. Pull it together, take a breather.

a reply to: Randyvine2

You are responding, but not replying.

Pull it together?

Quite. Please do.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Well don't go last word freak on me?

Here tackle this one if you need to do something?

What's gonna happen when they skirt out from under the argument
you embrace? The argument hat the vaccine isn't to blame? So they
can turn in point the finger at Trump? Or does that not make any
sense to you either? Have a look at the Mark Stein thread I'll see
you there mate.

a reply to: Randyvine2

Randy, old son.

I haven't said any of that. None of it.


I just pointed out the problems with the OP's source.

That was all I did.

Any comment on what I actually said?

It's for the OP to prove their claim.

Not up to me to prove a negative?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

I haven't said any of that. None of it.

That's why I didn't quote you as having said that.

It was a question.

a reply to: Randyvine2

I asked you a question?

Quite a straightforward one.

I am not trying to fall out with you.

To quote Dick Emery:. "I like you, but you are awful.."

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

To quote Dick Emery:. "I like you, but you are awful.."

Just don't make the mistake of thinking I don't mean to be!

a reply to: Randyvine2

Bless your heart!

I absolve you of all your many sins against me.

Now, I m off to the Brecons for a long weekend soon.

a reply to: Randyvine2

Randy, if I told you there was a teapot orbiting mars would you believe me?

Probably not..

You would ask me to prove it…

If I asked you, “you prove it’s not there”, would you be annoyed?

PA

The veracity of the OP's source notwithstanding, I see the MSM tide starting to turn a little here in the US. Pretty sure because some ill effects of the jab are getting harder to ignore and they want to tie it all to Trump. This will be trouble for the Donald that will be hard to defend. Fast tracking a unsafe jab. It will be interesting and possibly sad to watch as some of the most ardent supporters of the "vaccine" get on board the anti-jab wagon. And if they do not there had better be praise for all the road blocks Trump removed fast tracking this thing. I know many posters are not from the USA but some politics seem to transcend borders. I lean right myself and will have to be consistent if Trump does not make a Mea culpa on the vax nonsense.

a reply to: PerfectAnomoly

If I asked you, “you prove it’s not there”, would you be annoyed?

Honestly,
I wouldn't be annoyed at all. I'd just make sure I had your car keys.

But your shot at some kind of correlation is almost annoying if that
makes you feel better?

originally posted by: jtrenthacker
Hmm

< br />
So the Doctor was debunked by USA today, the Journal and MyGoPen and you find this meaningful in someway lol. Turn the alarm clock off. It’s time to wake up.

originally posted by: Lemon1234
a reply to: darkbake

Is there a difference from catching it naturally and having it injected into you?

You mean like the absence of lipid nano particles?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
Irrefutable proof?

Arguably not:

www.reuters.com...

Rage away.....

OOh! A Reuters "fact check"! We'd better go run and hide!