It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Genetic Modification/MRNA Vac Synthetic computer modelling into bodies exposed by WEF Klaus Schwab
page: 2share:
a reply to: TerryMcGuire
I see what you did there
Bring up a better solution. Of course capitalism isn't always fair but at least it enables the smart, handy and hard working people to find success. You know, those that take pride in work and do not need or want to be the piggy bank for either the state or people that just are lazy and use excuses.
My parents lived in the communistic part of Germany (I use this example because it's the polar opposite to capitalism) and I heard so much stories how bad things were, only a few good things. They didn't flee pregnant and with a two year old risking their life for no reason.
So if you're, like you imply, so knowledgeable about reactions, because capitalism is defended as the currently most fair system in place, then by all means educate us about a better system that is currently in place and makes people more happy, and treats them better. Where's that utopia again?
Instead of pulling a one line response that wasn't in the flow of a conversation yet for #'S and giggles. Educate us.
I see what you did there
Bring up a better solution. Of course capitalism isn't always fair but at least it enables the smart, handy and hard working people to find success. You know, those that take pride in work and do not need or want to be the piggy bank for either the state or people that just are lazy and use excuses.
My parents lived in the communistic part of Germany (I use this example because it's the polar opposite to capitalism) and I heard so much stories how bad things were, only a few good things. They didn't flee pregnant and with a two year old risking their life for no reason.
So if you're, like you imply, so knowledgeable about reactions, because capitalism is defended as the currently most fair system in place, then by all means educate us about a better system that is currently in place and makes people more happy, and treats them better. Where's that utopia again?
Instead of pulling a one line response that wasn't in the flow of a conversation yet for #'S and giggles. Educate us.
edit on 20.8.2022 by
TDDAgain because: add
originally posted by: RebornThroughReverance
... The great day of Gods wrath is soon on these people, oh how much of my family has been hurt from their poisons, go to God while he can still be found draw to him while he is near.
"Yea, though I walk through the Valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for Thou art with me. Thy rod and Thy staff, they comfort me."
- Psalms 23:4
I have been saying for a long time now that the practice of imprecatory prayer is legitimate and its time has arrived.
a reply to: TDDAgain
My experience here in these forums is to have found knee-jerk and simplistic reactions to even using the word capitalism or capitalist in a manner that is not always as you say, ''the best'' and all the rest. My short reply to Strong was in that vein.
Your' reply exemplified that. A short resounding trip into that old, repetitive hackneyed response of yeah but communism. And yes, you said, ''an example'' but was it really just an example? You might have used what else to juxtapose your reaction such as, oh say, feudalism or monarchism or what ever. It doesn't matter because the rest of that reaction on your part demonstrated that it was not just a random response but a knee-jerk reaction. The use of the term ''comrade'' was not used in the manner of one who is engaged in a common struggle, but rather in a standard and cheap pejorative way, in as you say, a sarcastic way.
But what solutions do I have ? Hardly any. Capitalism has won the day and the last centuries. Communism is gone unless one want's to continue to equate it with nothing more than totalitarianism and authoritarianism. And that's fine, but by making that equation of Communism being anti-capitalism and hence totalitarian negates or drastically reduces our ability to even think about capitalism in a questioning manner.
And none of that was introduced into the thread by Strong. Strong used the term in neither a positive manner or a negative manner, just as a reference to our economic system that Strong understands to have different stages. To that one word, not to anything else.
So, to your accusation of my short comment to Strong was not so much in line with the flow of the thread. I plead guilty.
I did not expect anyone to reply to it or pay it any attention other than Strong.
As I read though the thread I saw that you had posted as I thought one might. So while you accuse me of drifting from the flow of the thread, you did exactly the same thing. Yet while mine was not intended as a challenge to the flow of the thread or that one word, your response was also if not more of a drift, actually taking the conversation farther afield and starting a new topic, one which I might add you have chosen to continue in your post above.
And in your post above you have chosen to bring into this conversation your own second hand experiences in a communist regime. I"m pretty sure it was tough for your folks and gave you some good life's lessons on the comparisons of the goods of capitalism and the bads of communism. That's good teaching.
Again, capitalism has won, and for good reason. But that need not negate our ability to comprehend not only the goods but the bads as well that come with it as a system.
Finally, all Strong did was to use the word once with no emphasis on good or bad. It was you who chose or maybe didn't have any choice at all to pick that out to react to.
My experience here in these forums is to have found knee-jerk and simplistic reactions to even using the word capitalism or capitalist in a manner that is not always as you say, ''the best'' and all the rest. My short reply to Strong was in that vein.
Your' reply exemplified that. A short resounding trip into that old, repetitive hackneyed response of yeah but communism. And yes, you said, ''an example'' but was it really just an example? You might have used what else to juxtapose your reaction such as, oh say, feudalism or monarchism or what ever. It doesn't matter because the rest of that reaction on your part demonstrated that it was not just a random response but a knee-jerk reaction. The use of the term ''comrade'' was not used in the manner of one who is engaged in a common struggle, but rather in a standard and cheap pejorative way, in as you say, a sarcastic way.
But what solutions do I have ? Hardly any. Capitalism has won the day and the last centuries. Communism is gone unless one want's to continue to equate it with nothing more than totalitarianism and authoritarianism. And that's fine, but by making that equation of Communism being anti-capitalism and hence totalitarian negates or drastically reduces our ability to even think about capitalism in a questioning manner.
And none of that was introduced into the thread by Strong. Strong used the term in neither a positive manner or a negative manner, just as a reference to our economic system that Strong understands to have different stages. To that one word, not to anything else.
So, to your accusation of my short comment to Strong was not so much in line with the flow of the thread. I plead guilty.
I did not expect anyone to reply to it or pay it any attention other than Strong.
As I read though the thread I saw that you had posted as I thought one might. So while you accuse me of drifting from the flow of the thread, you did exactly the same thing. Yet while mine was not intended as a challenge to the flow of the thread or that one word, your response was also if not more of a drift, actually taking the conversation farther afield and starting a new topic, one which I might add you have chosen to continue in your post above.
And in your post above you have chosen to bring into this conversation your own second hand experiences in a communist regime. I"m pretty sure it was tough for your folks and gave you some good life's lessons on the comparisons of the goods of capitalism and the bads of communism. That's good teaching.
Again, capitalism has won, and for good reason. But that need not negate our ability to comprehend not only the goods but the bads as well that come with it as a system.
Finally, all Strong did was to use the word once with no emphasis on good or bad. It was you who chose or maybe didn't have any choice at all to pick that out to react to.
a reply to: TDDAgain
Blamed? There's no blame here, it's a fact. Capitalism works in such manner. Sorry you don't understand it. Sorry you don't like how it works. Winners and losers, innovators and consumers. Which one are you?
I'm not blaming capitalism, I'm pointing out the reality of the matter, I accept it. Seems like you don't. And considering you went off on a rant about those furthering technology as "nihilistic" and the abruptly went on a nihilistic whiny tangent afterwards I'm not the one complaining about capitalism, you are.
Blamed? There's no blame here, it's a fact. Capitalism works in such manner. Sorry you don't understand it. Sorry you don't like how it works. Winners and losers, innovators and consumers. Which one are you?
I'm not blaming capitalism, I'm pointing out the reality of the matter, I accept it. Seems like you don't. And considering you went off on a rant about those furthering technology as "nihilistic" and the abruptly went on a nihilistic whiny tangent afterwards I'm not the one complaining about capitalism, you are.
it's not 'capitalism' , as they are 'pulling all the global strings' .
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: TDDAgain
Did I hit a nerve by saying this is capitalism at work?
Normally , capitalism works by demand/supply and offering better service , product or price.
But this is not that at all, it's a take over , orchestrated globally by these corrupt 'elites' working together with global corporations.
a reply to: strongfp
The system of Capitalism doesn't quite explain this, it is more on terms of Globalist/Communistic principles, you can tell by the unity within all companies/orgs to achieve the goals of large think tank groups such as WEF and Club of Rome, almost every business CEO, Political Leader, and Billionaire "Philanthropist" all flock to these meetings and are members of these groups, They all fund/support the same movements with little to no dissent, Bill Gates was kicked out of India due to a large amount of woman becoming infertile and children becoming paralyzed from his needles, a clear population reduction job.
Complete global governance is their clear goal, Capitalism gives the common citizen too much freedom, WEF's predictions for 2030 were "You will own nothing, and you'll be happy" That's far from capitalism. Why do you think in the midst of the global economy crisis over 90% of all central banks are creating a Digital Currency? Soon we will be allotted digital income and only then will you have realized you're a slave in a twisted version of communism.
The system of Capitalism doesn't quite explain this, it is more on terms of Globalist/Communistic principles, you can tell by the unity within all companies/orgs to achieve the goals of large think tank groups such as WEF and Club of Rome, almost every business CEO, Political Leader, and Billionaire "Philanthropist" all flock to these meetings and are members of these groups, They all fund/support the same movements with little to no dissent, Bill Gates was kicked out of India due to a large amount of woman becoming infertile and children becoming paralyzed from his needles, a clear population reduction job.
Complete global governance is their clear goal, Capitalism gives the common citizen too much freedom, WEF's predictions for 2030 were "You will own nothing, and you'll be happy" That's far from capitalism. Why do you think in the midst of the global economy crisis over 90% of all central banks are creating a Digital Currency? Soon we will be allotted digital income and only then will you have realized you're a slave in a twisted version of communism.
a reply to: RebornThroughReverance
This is global capitalism. Nothing about it is communist, one of the people who was an architect of the trilateral comission was a staunch anti communist figure that helped dismantle the USSR, and worked closely with the CCP to get away from 'communism'. Zbigniew Brzezinski.
Communism is a global awakening moment, a crystal castle pie in the sky fantasy that doesn't exist. And it was attempted by socialist movements that tried to become a global workers power, and was stamped put by its collectivist policies and capitalist pressures.
How is what is going on now communist?
Where's the mass worker co ops? The collectivism? Where's the global workers movement?
Let me guess, you look at China which built itself off the back of chairman Dengs economic policies and worked closely with the US corporation machine to bring the consumer it's useless garbage, right?
That's capitalism on a global scale. And sorry to put it this way, you lost, I lost, there's only a handful of capitalists now because all the top capitalists over the years collaborated together to keep me and you out of the loop.
The problem isn't capitalism, the problem is there's not enough capitalists to keep the mass accumulation of wealth accumulating more and more to the point we see it today.
The subject goes far deeper, but this whole notion of: "the communists are taking over the world!" Is one of the most over blown lazy copes in political discourse nowadays. It's like beating a dead horse or sitting in a room full of flames and refusing to address the fire and smoke around you.
This is global capitalism. Nothing about it is communist, one of the people who was an architect of the trilateral comission was a staunch anti communist figure that helped dismantle the USSR, and worked closely with the CCP to get away from 'communism'. Zbigniew Brzezinski.
Communism is a global awakening moment, a crystal castle pie in the sky fantasy that doesn't exist. And it was attempted by socialist movements that tried to become a global workers power, and was stamped put by its collectivist policies and capitalist pressures.
How is what is going on now communist?
Where's the mass worker co ops? The collectivism? Where's the global workers movement?
Let me guess, you look at China which built itself off the back of chairman Dengs economic policies and worked closely with the US corporation machine to bring the consumer it's useless garbage, right?
That's capitalism on a global scale. And sorry to put it this way, you lost, I lost, there's only a handful of capitalists now because all the top capitalists over the years collaborated together to keep me and you out of the loop.
The problem isn't capitalism, the problem is there's not enough capitalists to keep the mass accumulation of wealth accumulating more and more to the point we see it today.
The subject goes far deeper, but this whole notion of: "the communists are taking over the world!" Is one of the most over blown lazy copes in political discourse nowadays. It's like beating a dead horse or sitting in a room full of flames and refusing to address the fire and smoke around you.
a reply to: ancientlight
Just like how Rockefeller wanted to dominate the petroleum industry in America? Carnegie wanted to dominate the steel industry? Ford wanted complete control over his entire operations buying up huge swathes of land in the amazon? East India company becoming it's own nation?
How there's only a few parent company's that own hundreds of lower company's? Disney owning fox, marvel, and countless other media and studio outlets?
The for profit health care model, or agricultural blunders in South America where entire rivers are bought up for cash crops?
Let me guess, that's communism at work right?
How did those company's and people get so powerful? Not by meeting a demand?
Just like how Rockefeller wanted to dominate the petroleum industry in America? Carnegie wanted to dominate the steel industry? Ford wanted complete control over his entire operations buying up huge swathes of land in the amazon? East India company becoming it's own nation?
How there's only a few parent company's that own hundreds of lower company's? Disney owning fox, marvel, and countless other media and studio outlets?
The for profit health care model, or agricultural blunders in South America where entire rivers are bought up for cash crops?
Let me guess, that's communism at work right?
How did those company's and people get so powerful? Not by meeting a demand?
a reply to: strongfp
Don't just think in the box with Soviet USSR, A Former USSR leader Mikhail Gorbachev said in a 1995 San Fransisco weekly interview that "In the next 20 to 30 years there will be a world government, it's inevitable." The difference between Soviet Union communism and Modernized Globalist communism is technology and its surveillance capabilities, back then limiting citizens was not feasible, you had to hire an agent to watch every person for rebellion, now with digital identities, contact tracing, Gene modifying, AI, and a soon to be globally connected digital economy, it's clearly setting the tone for a powerful revival, as Schwab claims "We should take a valuable lesson from countries like China".
Capitalism which breeds nationalism is soon to be dead, A Global Government does not wish to be hindered by nationalistic systems such as capitalism, although you are right about this, the elites have always been capitalists and never will stop being so, what I speak of only affects the common folk, you and me.
Don't just think in the box with Soviet USSR, A Former USSR leader Mikhail Gorbachev said in a 1995 San Fransisco weekly interview that "In the next 20 to 30 years there will be a world government, it's inevitable." The difference between Soviet Union communism and Modernized Globalist communism is technology and its surveillance capabilities, back then limiting citizens was not feasible, you had to hire an agent to watch every person for rebellion, now with digital identities, contact tracing, Gene modifying, AI, and a soon to be globally connected digital economy, it's clearly setting the tone for a powerful revival, as Schwab claims "We should take a valuable lesson from countries like China".
Capitalism which breeds nationalism is soon to be dead, A Global Government does not wish to be hindered by nationalistic systems such as capitalism, although you are right about this, the elites have always been capitalists and never will stop being so, what I speak of only affects the common folk, you and me.
originally posted by: TDDAgain
These people simply lost all empathy and respect towards life itself.
Yes it's been said there's a 'profound anti-humanism' at the core of all this.
Just follow the money now (and back then) to discover the roots of Eugenic psychopathy.
Just posted this interview on another thread and think it's extremely relevant to this thread.
"The challenge they have is how do you market a system that if people understood it nobody would want it?"
Full Interview
Transcript:
Big Tech are very afraid of this woman
Cheers.
a reply to: RebornThroughReverance
The Bible references the abomination of desolation. Personally after much research, I have come to the conclusion that the abomination is the corruption of the Word, that being DNA. I could be wrong, but it seems to me that the abomination and ensuing desolation of DNA may be the end. Fortunately, we may get a pole shift and subsequent crystal displacement. Read Edward Dutton's "Spiteful Mutants" as it may give some insight into the extreme amount of crazy and maladaptive social behavior these days.
Cheers - Dave
The Bible references the abomination of desolation. Personally after much research, I have come to the conclusion that the abomination is the corruption of the Word, that being DNA. I could be wrong, but it seems to me that the abomination and ensuing desolation of DNA may be the end. Fortunately, we may get a pole shift and subsequent crystal displacement. Read Edward Dutton's "Spiteful Mutants" as it may give some insight into the extreme amount of crazy and maladaptive social behavior these days.
Cheers - Dave
a reply to: strongfp
It’s not the fault of capitalism either, it’s called corruption. They operate like the Mafia plain and simple.
Though what China has and what the globalists want is fascism, in fact it’s already in place for the most part. Corporations and governments in bed together jerking each other off while they crap on the rest of us.
Let me guess, that's communism at work right? How did those company's and people get so powerful? Not by meeting a demand?
It’s not the fault of capitalism either, it’s called corruption. They operate like the Mafia plain and simple.
Though what China has and what the globalists want is fascism, in fact it’s already in place for the most part. Corporations and governments in bed together jerking each other off while they crap on the rest of us.
a reply to: surfer_soul
Do you think people follow the 'rules' and the theories behind capitalism?
Don't get me wrong, the theories behind it, and adding the moral feel goods behind it I think are fantastic, just as with socialism, they sound great on paper. Something to strive for.
But the reality is people are going to find ways around the systems that are championed. Capitalism is a self devouring beast, it encourages immoral profit hoarding and accumalation of capital above all, it needs checks and balances, which I agree with you, it's corruption that gives it a bad name.
But you can't sit by and say it's all fine, I'm a card carrying capitalist and then deny that what's happening right now is because of run away capitalism. It is it's own worst enemy, because it thrives off human nature.
Like I said earlier, we need more capitalists, otherwise you'll just end up with kings again. That's end stage capitalism, when all capital is in control of just a few hands.
Do you think people follow the 'rules' and the theories behind capitalism?
Don't get me wrong, the theories behind it, and adding the moral feel goods behind it I think are fantastic, just as with socialism, they sound great on paper. Something to strive for.
But the reality is people are going to find ways around the systems that are championed. Capitalism is a self devouring beast, it encourages immoral profit hoarding and accumalation of capital above all, it needs checks and balances, which I agree with you, it's corruption that gives it a bad name.
But you can't sit by and say it's all fine, I'm a card carrying capitalist and then deny that what's happening right now is because of run away capitalism. It is it's own worst enemy, because it thrives off human nature.
Like I said earlier, we need more capitalists, otherwise you'll just end up with kings again. That's end stage capitalism, when all capital is in control of just a few hands.
a reply to: RebornThroughReverance
Gorbachev was making such comments because he was noticing the direction of where the world was headed, towards a technocratic era. Not as in technocrats, ruling brainiacs and engineers, but as in the advancing and trajectory of technology within the next 30 years or so.
He used to have a lot of meetings with big corporate ceos to ask questions as to why the USSR couldn't keep up with the west, they had lots of educated people the infrastructure, etc. And he kept getting the same answers. The point being he didn't look to governments or state entities he looked to the private sector. And they all told him the same song and dance, he lacked competition with the global corporate machines that ran the middle areas of global economics.
The world is interconnected because of corporations nowadays, not because of national interests and when national interests get involved, you get government over reach like we saw with the patriot act or Trump causing a huge tariff war with China.
It's interesting you say capitalism breeds nationalism tho, I always viewed it as the opposite.
Gorbachev was making such comments because he was noticing the direction of where the world was headed, towards a technocratic era. Not as in technocrats, ruling brainiacs and engineers, but as in the advancing and trajectory of technology within the next 30 years or so.
He used to have a lot of meetings with big corporate ceos to ask questions as to why the USSR couldn't keep up with the west, they had lots of educated people the infrastructure, etc. And he kept getting the same answers. The point being he didn't look to governments or state entities he looked to the private sector. And they all told him the same song and dance, he lacked competition with the global corporate machines that ran the middle areas of global economics.
The world is interconnected because of corporations nowadays, not because of national interests and when national interests get involved, you get government over reach like we saw with the patriot act or Trump causing a huge tariff war with China.
It's interesting you say capitalism breeds nationalism tho, I always viewed it as the opposite.
a reply to: strongfp
Capitalism breeds nationalism in its citizens, promotes country borders and a big one, citizen private ownership, what wef is currently against and yada yada but instead of going into all that since that is not important, what is important is the twisted modifying they are doing to us.
As Gorbachev joined the group the Club of Rome that Rockefeller made, Rockefeller spoke of his involvement in the "secret cabal working against the interests of the United States" saying at the end to build a "one world, if you will" in his Rockefeller Memoir.
Money, capitalism, communism, it all means nothing to them more than a means of tricking and getting us vaccinated, the forever changing of our DNA. I pray you find the wisdom in Christ and come to understand the full truth of these workers of Satan.
Capitalism breeds nationalism in its citizens, promotes country borders and a big one, citizen private ownership, what wef is currently against and yada yada but instead of going into all that since that is not important, what is important is the twisted modifying they are doing to us.
As Gorbachev joined the group the Club of Rome that Rockefeller made, Rockefeller spoke of his involvement in the "secret cabal working against the interests of the United States" saying at the end to build a "one world, if you will" in his Rockefeller Memoir.
Money, capitalism, communism, it all means nothing to them more than a means of tricking and getting us vaccinated, the forever changing of our DNA. I pray you find the wisdom in Christ and come to understand the full truth of these workers of Satan.
a reply to: RebornThroughReverance
Am I going to die bc I got vaccine? Please don’t think less of me bc I did do it for this reason, the exact opposite reason everyone else got it. I am not happy, have never been happy, and will never be happy in life bc of permanent changes that happened to me and my health years back and the fact I’ve been alienated from my family and friends once I sought truth after 9/11. I saw it as a loophole that can’t be punishable by an eternity of damnation bc I’m not the one who will pull the trigger if you get my drift. Is it going to ultimately happen though? It was the saddest I’ve ever felt once it was over with. I feel pains in my chest and heart that weren’t there before. Does anyone have any thoughts for me? Honestly I am scared and wish I could undo what I chose, but that is my life constantly making bad choices. I’ll always be alone and unhappy regardless bc of the poor life decisions I made already.
Am I going to die bc I got vaccine? Please don’t think less of me bc I did do it for this reason, the exact opposite reason everyone else got it. I am not happy, have never been happy, and will never be happy in life bc of permanent changes that happened to me and my health years back and the fact I’ve been alienated from my family and friends once I sought truth after 9/11. I saw it as a loophole that can’t be punishable by an eternity of damnation bc I’m not the one who will pull the trigger if you get my drift. Is it going to ultimately happen though? It was the saddest I’ve ever felt once it was over with. I feel pains in my chest and heart that weren’t there before. Does anyone have any thoughts for me? Honestly I am scared and wish I could undo what I chose, but that is my life constantly making bad choices. I’ll always be alone and unhappy regardless bc of the poor life decisions I made already.
new topics
-
Trump-appointed judge blocks Biden administration overtime rule
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 1 hours ago -
Don't cry do Cryo instead
General Chit Chat: 6 hours ago -
Tariffs all around, Except for ...
Dreams & Predictions: 8 hours ago
top topics
-
Gen Flynn's Sister and her cohort blow the whistle on DHS/CBP involvement in child trafficking.
Whistle Blowers and Leaked Documents: 13 hours ago, 8 flags -
Don't cry do Cryo instead
General Chit Chat: 6 hours ago, 6 flags -
Anybody else using Pomodoro time management technique?
General Chit Chat: 16 hours ago, 3 flags -
Tariffs all around, Except for ...
Dreams & Predictions: 8 hours ago, 3 flags -
Trump-appointed judge blocks Biden administration overtime rule
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 1 hours ago, 2 flags
active topics
-
WATCH LIVE: US Congress hearing on UFOs, unidentified anomalous phenomena
Aliens and UFOs • 85 • : Lazy88 -
Tariffs all around, Except for ...
Dreams & Predictions • 14 • : Flyingclaydisk -
Don't cry do Cryo instead
General Chit Chat • 3 • : Flyingclaydisk -
The Acronym Game .. Pt.4
General Chit Chat • 963 • : JJproductions -
Trump picks Gov. Kristi Noem to serve as homeland security secretary
2024 Elections • 45 • : Solvedit -
Trump-appointed judge blocks Biden administration overtime rule
Social Issues and Civil Unrest • 0 • : Cabin -
How can you defend yourself when the police will not tell you what you did?
Posse Comitatus • 85 • : alldaylong -
Anybody else using Pomodoro time management technique?
General Chit Chat • 9 • : Cabin -
Oligarchy It Is Then
Short Stories • 14 • : UKTruth -
Mike Tyson returns 11-15-24
World Sports • 54 • : angelchemuel